Thanks
Is there anything specific in VCS that you may want to take advantage of? If
not, why bother? It just adds complexity.
Linchi
But, there is lot of flexibilty with VCS cluster. You can configure so many
options that are not available in MSCS. For example, you can write your
monitoring script and have VCS use it for polling SQL server.
"Linchi Shea" <Linch...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:D4D7ABC4-A96E-4E5A...@microsoft.com...
"Kalyan Yella" <kye...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:%23X$wET1qG...@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
"Hassan" <Has...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23TbiS3E...@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
1. Does MS failover clustreing meet most, if not all, of my failover
clustering requirements?
2. When things happen, can I get the same level of support with VCS as I do
MSCS?
For me, the answer to the first question is yes, and the answer to the 2nd
question is probably not. And supportability should be one of the key
decision factors.
Linchi