<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>microsoft.public.sms.swdist Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sms.swdist</link>
  <description></description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>RE: MSI package</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sms.swdist/browse_thread/thread/4a382d2125d6a051/6f9a9f3e2f24a92a?show_docid=6f9a9f3e2f24a92a</link>
  <description>
  For testing to see what 1603 *really* means, change the command line in SMS to: &lt;br&gt; msiexec /i &amp;quot;lotus notes 8.0.1.msi&amp;quot; TRANSFORMS=&amp;quot;lotus801.mst&amp;quot; /qn /l*v &lt;br&gt; c:\Notes8.log &lt;br&gt; After it runs, go read the log file. After it fails, the log will have a &lt;br&gt; lot of information; usually the real error is a hundred or more lines up from
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sms.swdist/browse_thread/thread/4a382d2125d6a051/6f9a9f3e2f24a92a?show_docid=6f9a9f3e2f24a92a</guid>
  <author>
  sherrykissingermvp...@discussions.microsoft.com
  (Sherry Kissinger [ MVP-SMS ])
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:58:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>MSI package</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sms.swdist/browse_thread/thread/4a382d2125d6a051/d545acd73ebec0f5?show_docid=d545acd73ebec0f5</link>
  <description>
  We are using SMS 2003. &lt;br&gt; We are trying to deploy Lotus Notes 8.0.1 via SMS. For the package, I use &lt;br&gt; this syntax: msiexec /i &amp;quot;lotus notes 8.0.1.msi&amp;quot; TRANSFORMS=&amp;quot;lotus801.mst&amp;quot; /qn &lt;br&gt; If I login as the local admin and use this exact syntax (with the necessary &lt;br&gt; modifications) msiexec /i &amp;quot;\\server\folder\lotus notes 8.0.1.msi&amp;quot;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sms.swdist/browse_thread/thread/4a382d2125d6a051/d545acd73ebec0f5?show_docid=d545acd73ebec0f5</guid>
  <author>
  wli...@discussions.microsoft.com
  (wli2k2)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 02:38:00 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>XP SP3 distribution</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sms.swdist/browse_thread/thread/2e693dbd699dfecf/03b7171913bcf4fd?show_docid=03b7171913bcf4fd</link>
  <description>
  We are having an issue distributing XP Service Pack 3 via SMS/ITMU... about &lt;br&gt; 10-20% of the clients are reporting successful, but are still at XP SP2. &lt;br&gt; PATCHINSTALL.LOG shows a Failsafe timeout 99 minutes after it starts, which &lt;br&gt; is the timeout specified in the /t switch. Should be more than enough time?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sms.swdist/browse_thread/thread/2e693dbd699dfecf/03b7171913bcf4fd?show_docid=03b7171913bcf4fd</guid>
  <author>
  db...@discussions.microsoft.com
  (db614)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:39:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Branch DP with BITS enabled clients</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sms.swdist/browse_thread/thread/883c12cf7c72978a/da226a5203f95fba?show_docid=da226a5203f95fba</link>
  <description>
  ignore this - I now understand... &lt;br&gt; thanks
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sms.swdist/browse_thread/thread/883c12cf7c72978a/da226a5203f95fba?show_docid=da226a5203f95fba</guid>
  <author>
  (Matthew White)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:54:49 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Branch DP with BITS enabled clients</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sms.swdist/browse_thread/thread/883c12cf7c72978a/0ad051a06c9854e2?show_docid=0ad051a06c9854e2</link>
  <description>
  Hello, &lt;br&gt; I have a question regarding the use of BITS clients and branch DP: &lt;br&gt; If all clients are set to use BITS in the site properties, can they &lt;br&gt; download content from a branch DP? &lt;br&gt; I am in the process of formulating recommendations regarding the &lt;br&gt; following decision for a distributed network with serverless sites:
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sms.swdist/browse_thread/thread/883c12cf7c72978a/0ad051a06c9854e2?show_docid=0ad051a06c9854e2</guid>
  <author>
  (Matthew White)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:17:53 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: SMS 2003 server: problem adding static rules to a collection</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sms.swdist/browse_thread/thread/13a97be2ac56d5d6/c7783f8b36c24703?show_docid=c7783f8b36c24703</link>
  <description>
  I thought that the limit was much smaller than 2000 more like 500 but yes &lt;br&gt; there is a limit. &lt;br&gt; One of the trick is to create multiple collection below one main collection &lt;br&gt; with about 490 workstations in each collection. Then advertise to the top &lt;br&gt; collection and select the included sub-collection check box.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sms.swdist/browse_thread/thread/13a97be2ac56d5d6/c7783f8b36c24703?show_docid=c7783f8b36c24703</guid>
  <author>
  s...@spam.ca
  (Garth)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:22:16 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>SMS 2003 server: problem adding static rules to a collection</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sms.swdist/browse_thread/thread/13a97be2ac56d5d6/cec6aa17bbe51c9a?show_docid=cec6aa17bbe51c9a</link>
  <description>
  Hi everyone, &lt;br&gt; i&#39;m experiencing the following problem. &lt;br&gt; We have several tools which allow us to add statically elements to a &lt;br&gt; collection &lt;br&gt; (Simviewer and makecoll command)) &lt;br&gt; The tools simply create in a collection a static rule which points to a &lt;br&gt; workstation ID we define. &lt;br&gt; Basically we list all workstations ID in a txt file and we run a process
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sms.swdist/browse_thread/thread/13a97be2ac56d5d6/cec6aa17bbe51c9a?show_docid=cec6aa17bbe51c9a</guid>
  <author>
  marcomari...@discussions.microsoft.com
  (Marco Mariani)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:50:00 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>RE: Package not installing - WaitingDependency</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sms.swdist/browse_thread/thread/bd17ba9ba3a999ae/46cea26815ce4b7c?show_docid=46cea26815ce4b7c</link>
  <description>
  Is there a log file, where i can see what is the dependency the execution is &lt;br&gt; waiting for?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sms.swdist/browse_thread/thread/bd17ba9ba3a999ae/46cea26815ce4b7c?show_docid=46cea26815ce4b7c</guid>
  <author>
  n...@discussions.microsoft.com
  (Noro)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:39:00 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>RE: redploy app</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sms.swdist/browse_thread/thread/9fc286b0cc5de9f4/3bc948988cbe7f6c?show_docid=3bc948988cbe7f6c</link>
  <description>
  New MSI? Did you build it yourself? If you have, what I recommend is &lt;br&gt; updating the &amp;quot;version&amp;quot; of the software; and set the new MSI to upgrade the &lt;br&gt; previous version. If you have absolutely no clue what I&#39;m talking about, &lt;br&gt; there is a course from desktopengineering.com that can help you demystify &lt;br&gt; Windows Installer for the SMS/ConfigMgr admin.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sms.swdist/browse_thread/thread/9fc286b0cc5de9f4/3bc948988cbe7f6c?show_docid=3bc948988cbe7f6c</guid>
  <author>
  sherrykissingermvp...@discussions.microsoft.com
  (Sherry Kissinger [ MVP-SMS ])
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:21:00 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>RE: Package not installing - WaitingDependency</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sms.swdist/browse_thread/thread/bd17ba9ba3a999ae/8bb6b8918a1be96a?show_docid=8bb6b8918a1be96a</link>
  <description>
  It essentially means it&#39;s waiting for either another application to finish &lt;br&gt; successfully (i.e., you used &amp;quot;run another program first&amp;quot;), or it&#39;s waiting &lt;br&gt; for a dependent condition, like &amp;quot;only when no user is logged in&amp;quot;. &lt;br&gt; Sometimes the other dependent program did finish successfully, but because &lt;br&gt; of a reboot condition set incorrectly, it&#39;s still waiting for a reboot.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sms.swdist/browse_thread/thread/bd17ba9ba3a999ae/8bb6b8918a1be96a?show_docid=8bb6b8918a1be96a</guid>
  <author>
  sherrykissingermvp...@discussions.microsoft.com
  (Sherry Kissinger [ MVP-SMS ])
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:16:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Package not installing - WaitingDependency</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sms.swdist/browse_thread/thread/bd17ba9ba3a999ae/2f94990328e24574?show_docid=2f94990328e24574</link>
  <description>
  Hi, &lt;br&gt; can anyone explain me what exactly mean the &amp;quot;WaitingDependency&amp;quot; state change &lt;br&gt; for execution request (in execmgr.log)? I have troubles deploying software on &lt;br&gt; some of my clients, where the state change is going from WaitingDependency to &lt;br&gt; WaitingDependency. It lasts for 5 days now. I&#39;m not able to find solution for
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sms.swdist/browse_thread/thread/bd17ba9ba3a999ae/2f94990328e24574?show_docid=2f94990328e24574</guid>
  <author>
  n...@discussions.microsoft.com
  (Noro)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 08:30:13 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>redploy app</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sms.swdist/browse_thread/thread/9fc286b0cc5de9f4/5d2f03fa518f40a9?show_docid=5d2f03fa518f40a9</link>
  <description>
  If i have a msi that was installed and now i have updated the program &lt;br&gt; and want to redeploy the new msi is there a quick anser on how to do &lt;br&gt; this? Can i just place the new msi in the distribution point and tell &lt;br&gt; it to run the advertisement again? Or can some one direct me to a &lt;br&gt; website that can help me with this? I am running SCCM 2007. Thanks
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sms.swdist/browse_thread/thread/9fc286b0cc5de9f4/5d2f03fa518f40a9?show_docid=5d2f03fa518f40a9</guid>
  <author>
  kh...@scic.com
  (cptkirkh)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 03:00:17 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>OSD Task Failed, 0x80004005</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sms.swdist/browse_thread/thread/2e9f611db15e7788/93a9b0c47454a88e?show_docid=93a9b0c47454a88e</link>
  <description>
  I have SCCM 2007 SP1 and have been using OSD to deploy Vista and XP to new &lt;br&gt; machines via PXE and recently, my Vista Task Sequence has stopped working &lt;br&gt; properly. It works fine all the way up until the &amp;quot;Setup Windows and &lt;br&gt; ConfigMgr&amp;quot; task, then it errors out. &lt;br&gt; Like I said, it worked fine last month. The only things that have changed
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sms.swdist/browse_thread/thread/2e9f611db15e7788/93a9b0c47454a88e?show_docid=93a9b0c47454a88e</guid>
  <author>
  tkm...@discussions.microsoft.com
  (tkmlee)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:18:21 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>**BARCELONA** R4 DS CARTUCHOS ** www.R4spain.com/tienda</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sms.swdist/browse_thread/thread/cc787534a3e6ef79/52335945de492d69?show_docid=52335945de492d69</link>
  <description>
  **BARCELONA** R4 DS CARTUCHOS ** &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.R4spain.com/tienda&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; **BARCELONA** R4 DS CARTUCHOS ** &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.R4spain.com/tienda&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; **BARCELONA** R4 DS CARTUCHOS ** &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.R4spain.com/tienda&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; **BARCELONA** R4 DS CARTUCHOS ** &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.R4spain.com/tienda&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt;  
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sms.swdist/browse_thread/thread/cc787534a3e6ef79/52335945de492d69?show_docid=52335945de492d69</guid>
  <author>
  al54...@msn.com
  (Albert)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 08:43:13 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>SCCM 2007 - unicast WOL</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sms.swdist/browse_thread/thread/66044e4e8c423bb3/71dd44ad321e0d73?show_docid=71dd44ad321e0d73</link>
  <description>
  We have a SCCM 2007 SP1 in mixed mode on a W2K3 SP2 server and we are testing &lt;br&gt; software distribution with WOL on the same subnet as the SCCM server. &lt;br&gt; WOL subnet-directed broadcasts works fine. But we want to use unicast WOL &lt;br&gt; because broadcasts are blocked by our routers and we need also to distribute
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sms.swdist/browse_thread/thread/66044e4e8c423bb3/71dd44ad321e0d73?show_docid=71dd44ad321e0d73</guid>
  <author>
  d...@discussions.microsoft.com
  (dpat)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 08:46:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
