Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion An argument (okay a debate) with a developer
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Kevin Spencer  
View profile  
 More options Oct 4 2006, 6:24 am
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.scripting.vbscript, microsoft.public.dotnet.general, microsoft.public.dotnet.framework
From: "Kevin Spencer" <u...@ftc.gov>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 06:24:47 -0400
Local: Wed, Oct 4 2006 6:24 am
Subject: Re: An argument (okay a debate) with a developer

> This is incorrect.  Minimal cross-posting is in fact fine.  The original
> poster should monitor all newsgroups to which they posted, since of course
> someone may reply while trimming the Newsgroups: field.  But assuming one
> is not putting off-topic newsgroups in the Newsgroups: field,
> cross-posting can be a very effective means of addressing a
> broader-but-still-relevant audience than a single newsgroup offers.

And *that* is all opinion. While I gave logical reasons for my counsel, you
simply stated opinions as if they were facts, without any logical reasons to
support them. Furthermore, *I* am not asking for advice. How is your
criticism helpful ?

In addition, I notice that you never did help the OP. I gave the OP a
detailed answer to his question earlier (in response his original post).
Perhaps you just like to criticise people, rather than help.

> The only time I mind answering questions that have already been answered
> elsewhere is when it turns out I'm a clueless dolt and the other answer
> exposes my ignorance.  :)

Perhaps you have plenty of spare time. Mine is worth a good bit of money,
and I have very little to spare. And I don't believe that your opinion is
representative of the majority of experts who participate in these
newsgroups out of a sense of social conscience.

> Finally, forgive me if I find just a little amusing the situation of a
> person lecturing on netiquette while posting articles using someone else's
> email address, a very egregious violation of netiquette.

Someone else's email address? Well, I suppose you must be a clueless dolt.
That is the US Federal Trade Commission's SPAM email address
(http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2002/02/eileenspam1.htm). As you may read in the
referenced web page, that address is specifically for the purpose of
forwarding SPAM. I see that you disguise your email address to prevent
SPAMmers from sending you SPAM. I go one step better. I let SPAMmers send it
directly to the FTC. If you had Googled the email address, you would have
found this out before you embarassed yourself publicly.

--

Kevin Spencer
Microsoft MVP
Software Composer
http://unclechutney.blogspot.com

If the Truth hurts, wear it.

"Peter Duniho" <NpOeStPe...@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> wrote in message

news:12i5bsudlr82r93@corp.supernews.com...
> "Kevin Spencer" <u...@ftc.gov> wrote in message
> news:e4kxdRx5GHA.4592@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> [...]
>> Which brings me to my final point: Cross-posting to multiple newsgroups
>> is not considered good netiquette, and is likely to result in your not
>> being able to find any answers, since the answers will not necessarily be
>> posted to all of the newsgroups you posted to

> This is incorrect.  Minimal cross-posting is in fact fine.  The original
> poster should monitor all newsgroups to which they posted, since of course
> someone may reply while trimming the Newsgroups: field.  But assuming one
> is not putting off-topic newsgroups in the Newsgroups: field,
> cross-posting can be a very effective means of addressing a
> broader-but-still-relevant audience than a single newsgroup offers.

>> and people who help others (such as myself) do not like answering
>> questions that have already been answered elsewhere.

> The alternative to cross-posting is posting to only a single newsgroup, in
> which case you're going to wind up answering the question anyway.  How
> does an answer in a different newsgroup somehow detract from the value of
> your own answer?  For that matter, since Usenet isn't an immediate forum,
> you could answer the question only to find out that someone else has
> already answered the same question in the very newsgroup in which you've
> posted your answer.

> The only time I mind answering questions that have already been answered
> elsewhere is when it turns out I'm a clueless dolt and the other answer
> exposes my ignorance.  :)

> Finally, forgive me if I find just a little amusing the situation of a
> person lecturing on netiquette while posting articles using someone else's
> email address, a very egregious violation of netiquette.

> Pete


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.