I wanted some audible notification when I get a new rss feed, so I
made a rule which plays a wav file when any rss feed arrives. But it
looks like that there are wav files that Outlook cannot play. For
example,
http://misako.co.kr/externaldata/ok.wav <- this is OK
http://misako.co.kr/externaldata/error.wav <- this is no't OK, Outlook
plays the 'ding' sound instead.
(Note : file names have been changed to let you distinguish them
easily)
At first, I thought it must be because of different bit rates or
sampling rates or whatsoever, but after examining the two wav files
above, I've found that their properties (at least those I can check)
are the same. I cannot figure out what is wrong. Could you give me any
hint? Thank you.
PS : Outlook 2008, Vista (64bit)
Probably because the WAV file is a mp3 encoded wav file. Based on the file
header, it looks like it. http://www.afterdawn.com/glossary/terms/riff-wav.cfm
Now, why Outlook uses its own system to play audio files and not just let
the OS do it, no clue.
--
-f.h.
GSpot (codec information tool) shows that both files are the same when it
comes to bitrates and codecs used to play the file. So why there is a
difference in behavior when it comes to the file and OS used needs to be a
bit further analyzed but is off-topic for this newsgroup.
--
Robert Sparnaaij [MVP-Outlook]
Coauthor, Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
http://www.howto-outlook.com/
Outlook FAQ, HowTo, Downloads, Add-Ins and more
http://www.msoutlook.info/
Real World Questions, Real World Answers
-----
"F.H. Muffman" <f.h.m...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:74243f342532c8...@msnews.microsoft.com...
On Jun 8, 7:09 pm, "Roady [MVP]"
<newsgroups_DELETE_@_DELETE_sparnaaij_NO_._SPAM_net> wrote:
> Outlook doesn't play them but the OS. What WMP can play is not a
> representation of what the OS can play. Test the error.wav file in Windows
> Sounds and note it won't play either (Windows Vista 32-bit and 64-bit).
> However, it does play in Windows XP.
>
> GSpot (codec information tool) shows that both files are the same when it
> comes to bitrates and codecs used to play the file. So why there is a
> difference in behavior when it comes to the file and OS used needs to be a
> bit further analyzed but is off-topic for this newsgroup.
>
> --
> Robert Sparnaaij [MVP-Outlook]
> Coauthor, Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003http://www.howto-outlook.com/
> Outlook FAQ, HowTo, Downloads, Add-Ins and more
>
> http://www.msoutlook.info/
> Real World Questions, Real World Answers
>
> -----
>
> "F.H. Muffman" <f.h.muff...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
--
Robert Sparnaaij [MVP-Outlook]
Coauthor, Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
http://www.howto-outlook.com/
Outlook FAQ, HowTo, Downloads, Add-Ins and more
http://www.msoutlook.info/
Real World Questions, Real World Answers
-----
"RealCat" <typi...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:74d17e76-7a5c-4626...@i36g2000prf.googlegroups.com...