Office 2004 SP1 - What did it Fix??
The Terminator
--
"Thus I helped the tyrant of the gods and with this foul payment he has responded; for it is a disease that is somehow inherent in tyranny to have no faith in friends." [Prometheus, Aeschylus, Prometheus Bound 225]
JE McGimpsey
Beth Rosengard <bethro...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> At the bottom of the download page at Mactopia.com, it says this:
>
> "For more information about this service release, see Knowledge Base (KB)
> article KB 883951 at http://support.microsoft.com."
>
> The actual URL is <http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=883951>
Note that it fixes more than the KB says. I'm reworking some of the bugs
I list on my site.
JE McGimpsey
Willis Eschenbach <wil...@taunovobay.com> wrote:
> Man, that is the most pathetic list of bug fixes I've seen in a while, and
> at 22 megs, that's about 2 megs per fix! Meanwhile, Excel crashes at odd
> times with nary a clue why, I send in my regular reports to Microsloth, and
> what happens? Whoopee, they fix some obscure bug in the German version!
>
> For those of us out here in the mid Pacific, paying premium rates for very
> slow internet service, this is an expensive and insulting 22 megabyte bad
> joke.
Like I said, it fixed more than what's on the list - for instance, in
XL, the Range.Copy bug in VBA appears to be fixed, along with some focus
problems associated with Userforms (Note: I haven't thoroughly tested).
Neither of these were on the list, but they correct things that were
show-stoppers for some of my clients.
I suspect that the list reflects MS's typical generalization when
releasing SP's: They often don't address particular bugs, apparently
under the theory that admitting the bug in the first place might lead to
liability. That's just my personal guess, tho'.
Frank
I've found that, with Excel, I now get a message on quitting "Compile
error in hidden module: AutoExec". This didn't occur before SP1. Is
this a bug?
M-Rick
> Man, that is the most pathetic list of bug fixes I've seen in a while, and
> at 22 megs, that's about 2 megs per fix! Meanwhile, Excel crashes at odd
> times with nary a clue why, I send in my regular reports to Microsloth, and
> what happens? Whoopee, they fix some obscure bug in the German version!
>
> For those of us out here in the mid Pacific, paying premium rates for very
> slow internet service, this is an expensive and insulting 22 megabyte bad
> joke.
>
>
> in article jemcgimpsey-DCBA...@msnews.microsoft.com, JE
> McGimpsey at jemcg...@mvps.org wrote on 13/10/04 12:04 PM:
this price how long we will have to wait to get something to work ?
Microsoft is very pathetic ....
Hope OpenOffice will be completed soon ...
Beth Rosengard
--
***Please always reply to the newsgroup!***
Beth Rosengard
Mac MVP
Mac Word FAQ: <http://word.mvps.org/MacWordNew/index.htm>
Entourage Help Page: <http://www.entourage.mvps.org>
On 10/13/04 10:30 PM, in article BD935D0E.568E%the_ter...@comcast.net, "The Terminator" <the_ter...@comcast.net> wrote:
So which component is broken – Excel or PDFMaker? The error is not happening in Word or PowerPoint.
On 10/13/04 17:14, in article BD93130F.3601%bethro...@earthlink.net, "Beth Rosengard" <bethro...@earthlink.net> wrote:
Hi Hugh,
It has to do with the PDFMaker add-in. For a workaround, see the previous
posts on this same thread.
Fredrik Wahlgren
"matt neuburg" <ma...@tidbits.com> wrote in message
news:1glmy6c.1qrw12616i0jugN%ma...@tidbits.com...
>
> For example, if you set the filter in the Revisions toolbar to show only
> Comments, and there are no comments, then if you press the Next button
> in the toolbar, Word will crash. I've performed this crash reliably
> dozens of times, and every time a report has presumably gone to
> Microsoft. It isn't fixed.
>
> There's a major bug in VBA in the Range.New method where you supply
> numbers for the range's position: if your document has any fields in it,
> the range may end up in completely the wrong place. This isn't fixed.
>
> I could rattle on and on, but my point is, don't make the
> reverse-psychology mistake of assuming that something is fixed merely
> because it is *not* listed at that URL. m.
>
>
> --
> matt neuburg, phd = ma...@tidbits.com, http://www.tidbits.com/matt/
> AppleScript: The Definitive Guide
> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0596005571/somethingsbymatt
> Read TidBITS! It's free and smart. http://www.tidbits.com
I haven't had this kind of Crash. Does the bug report offer a field in which
you can enter some kind of description?
/ Fredrik
JE McGimpsey
ma...@tidbits.com (matt neuburg) wrote:
> > Note that it fixes more than the KB says. I'm reworking some of the bugs
> > I list on my site.
>
> It sure didn't fix some of the main bugs I know about.
>
>...
>
> I could rattle on and on, but my point is, don't make the
> reverse-psychology mistake of assuming that something is fixed merely
> because it is *not* listed at that URL. m.
Certainly wasn't trying to imply that all, or even most bugs are fixed.
However, there ARE some significant fixes (e.g. LoadPicture, XL's
Range.Copy, Userform Focus, etc.) that aren't listed in the KB.
Paul Berkowitz
"matt neuburg" <ma...@tidbits.com> wrote:
> It sure didn't fix some of the main bugs I know about.
>
> For example, if you set the filter in the Revisions toolbar to show only
> Comments, and there are no comments, then if you press the Next button
> in the toolbar, Word will crash. I've performed this crash reliably
> dozens of times, and every time a report has presumably gone to
> Microsoft. It isn't fixed.
>
> There's a major bug in VBA in the Range.New method where you supply
> numbers for the range's position: if your document has any fields in it,
> the range may end up in completely the wrong place. This isn't fixed.
>
> I could rattle on and on, but my point is, don't make the
> reverse-psychology mistake of assuming that something is fixed merely
> because it is *not* listed at that URL. m.
Office 11.1.0 is not advertised as a major bug-fix release. It was announced
as a release that fixes security issues and stability, and also happens to
have some bug fixes, some of which are announced in that KB article and some
of which, as JE says, were not. The security issues are mostly "potential
holes" for possible exploits, none of which has occurred and now can'. You
won't notice anything. Some crashing bugs (rare circumstances) have been
fixed (the "stability" issues).
As far as other bugs go, it's the usual thing for an early service release:
they tried to fix bugs or nuisances that thousands of people have reported,
if they were easy enough to fix in time. For example, there have been
countless reports (several hundreds right here on the newsgroups, thousand
more via MS Error Reporting) about Entourage's icon bouncing repeatedly in
the Dock when there's a server error. That has been fixed. The Word errors
you report above, Matt, have probably only been reported by you and maybe a
couple of others. That wasn't enough to get them high priority, Anything to
do with VBA is specialist, and quite possibly difficult to fix, to boot.
MS apparently really is using the Error Reporting (MERP) to find bugs and to
prioritize. So do, everyone, keep sending in reports.
MS never announce update releases in advance. But I'm quite sure they are
planning more bug fix releases for 2004. 11.1.0 is not the end of it.
--
Paul Berkowitz
MVP MacOffice
Entourage FAQ Page: <http://www.entourage.mvps.org/faq/index.html>
AppleScripts for Entourage: <http://macscripter.net/scriptbuilders/>
Please "Reply To Newsgroup" to reply to this message. Emails will be
ignored.
PLEASE always state which version of Microsoft Office you are using -
**2004**, X or 2001. It's often impossible to answer your questions
otherwise.
Phillip M. Jones, CE.T.
> frank...@idpm.biz (Frank) wrote in message news:<ec3c09f0.04101...@posting.google.com>...
> the same message. I have no idea what it means. So far it doesn't seem
> to affect the way the program runs, except that I can no longer shut
> down and walk away. Assuming that someone from Microsoft is reading
> these, will there be a fix of the fix, or is there some way to delete
> the module in which there is a compile error?
Dump any of the PDFMaker related files in Word, Excel, and PowerPoint.
replace them with folders with identical names. The same subject has
come up in the Adobe Acrobat newsgroups. I've posted several times in
the last month or two how to do it. It's these files casing these
strange error messages.
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street |Who's Who. PHONE:276-632-5045, FAX:276-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809 |pjo...@kimbanet.com, ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!
mailto:pjo...@kimbanet.com
<http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/default.htm>
<http://home.kimbanet.com/~pjones/birthday/index.htm>
<http://vpea.exis.net>
Phillip M. Jones, CE.T.
Okay the post must be whizing off in to the sunset.
Here is the permantent cure to remove PDFMaker.
Quit Office/word/excel/powerpoint.
from finder choose find file and type in PDFMaker
There should be three files. one for Word. one for excel, one for powerpoint
create 3 empty Folders. copy the name of each file and paste on each of
the three folder The one for example is PDFMaker.xla.
now go to each folder containing folder containing appropriate File
for example go to folder containing file named PDFMaker.xla.
Now move that file to trash. now sub the folder named PDFMaker.xla.
reat for the word setup and the powerpoint setup subing the appropriate
named folder.
Now. empty Trash
Now open word, Excel or Powerpoint
PDFMaker should no longer show up and there may be a marked difference
in opening time for them. (YMMV)
You should no longer get this erro message. You should no longer have
any strange load problems from now on.
Adobe has taken upon itself to emaulate a Practice Microsoft does on its
products that some times get it in trouble - "Self-Healing".
If Acrobat discovers these files missing it takes upon itself to
reinstall them. IN Office if it doscovers missing files it takes upon
itself to locate and reinstall them. (Two attempts from competting
applications (Competeing in that they try to fix things) spells trouble.)
Thie trick takes into acount and old trick that has been in eefect on
the Mac OS since day one and also in UNIX.
You CAN'T overwrite a file with s folder; and the opposite is also true
you CAN'T overwrite a folder with a file.
Write this down save it committ this tos PDF, save it on a
floppy,CD/DVD/ZIP Disk Jazz Drive/Super Disk. what ever method you have
for saving tips. and keep it as long as you use acrobat and Office.
Beth Rosengard
I had already outlined the workaround on this thread; you didn't need to do
it again. When I said "no answers at this point," I was referring to the
question about exactly who needs to do a fix Adobe or MS. I see from one
of your previous posts that you believe it to be Adobe. That would have
been my assumption as well but in the absence of evidence, I declined to
guess. You might want to read a little more carefully before responding
next time.
--
***Please always reply to the newsgroup!***
Beth Rosengard
Mac MVP
Mac Word FAQ: <http://word.mvps.org/MacWordNew/index.htm>
Entourage Help Page: <http://www.entourage.mvps.org>
On 10/14/04 4:18 PM, in article eVuCwQks...@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl,
Beth Rosengard
ec3c09f0.04101...@posting.google.com, "Frank"
<frank...@idpm.biz> wrote:
> I've found that, with Excel, I now get a message on quitting "Compile
> error in hidden module: AutoExec". This didn't occur before SP1. Is
> this a bug?
Hi Frank,
Another user reported that this error was due to the presence of the
PDFMaker add-in in the Excel Startup folder. Below is the procedure to get
rid of it based on a workaround by J.E. McGimpsey. I would appreciate it
very much if you would report back on whether or not this procedure works
for you.
--
***Please always reply to the newsgroup!***
Beth Rosengard
Mac MVP
Mac Word FAQ: <http://word.mvps.org/MacWordNew/index.htm>
Entourage Help Page: <http://www.entourage.mvps.org>
> 1. In the Finder, do a "Find" for "PDFMaker". You will probably discover
> These annoying files in three Startup folders (Word, Excel, PowerPoint),
> namely PDFMaker.dot, PDFMaker.xla and PDFMaker.ppa Trash the files.
>
> 2. In place of each of them, create a new blank *folder* with the names,
> respectively, of PDFMaker.dot, PDFMaker.xla and PDFMaker.ppa.
>
> 3. When you open Acrobat you may be told there is a discrepancy and asked
> whether you want it repaired. Click "Don't ask me again" and "No" to the
> repair question.
>
> The result is that when you open Acrobat, it will "see" that you already
> have a PDFMaker.dot or .xla in folder form and will not create another nor
> overwrite what's there (since a file can't overwrite a folder).
The Terminator
On 10/13/04 11:45, in article BD92C5CD.35E3%bethro...@earthlink.net, "Beth Rosengard" <bethro...@earthlink.net> wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, CE.T.
On Acrobat newsgroup this is found to be caused by the PDFMaker.xla
file. (the file that creates that &*$# PDFMaker Thingi on word,excel,
and powerpoint menus.
create a folder named PDFMaker.xla and replace the file of the same name
with this folder. The Dratted PDFMaker will be gone forever and a day
(Unles you remove and resinstall Office).
Repeat for equivelent files in Word and Powerpoint as well.
Willis Eschenbach
McGimpsey at jemcg...@mvps.org wrote on 14/10/04 2:15 AM:
> Like I said, it fixed more than what's on the list - for instance, in
> XL, the Range.Copy bug in VBA appears to be fixed, along with some focus
> problems associated with Userforms (Note: I haven't thoroughly tested).
> Neither of these were on the list, but they correct things that were
> show-stoppers for some of my clients.
>
> I suspect that the list reflects MS's typical generalization when
> releasing SP's: They often don't address particular bugs, apparently
> under the theory that admitting the bug in the first place might lead to
> liability. That's just my personal guess, tho'.
Ooogh. I was afraid of that. Well, guess I've just got to bite the bullet
and pay the monkey for the connect time ...
Thanks, JE.
w.
Phillip M. Jones, CE.T.
PdfMaker For me has never worked. Even in OS9. In OS9 it caused Word to
take Five minutes or more to load. On a G4-500 with 1.5GB of System RAM.
If you have OSX the PDFMaker is redundant. You can create PDF from the
print menu. And if you have acrobat to begin with you can simply choose
the Adobe PDF printer setup. so you have two way to create PDF's you
don't need a Third.
Phillip M. Jones, CE.T.
> So which component is broken – Excel or PDFMaker? The error is not
> happening in Word or PowerPoint.
>
>
> On 10/13/04 17:14, in article BD93130F.3601%bethro...@earthlink.net,
> "Beth Rosengard" <bethro...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> Hi Hugh,
>
> It has to do with the PDFMaker add-in. For a workaround, see the
> previous
> posts on this same thread.
>
>
Phillip M. Jones, CE.T.
On Cnet.news and Coumperworld they were characterized as critical
security update.
Beth Rosengard
I have already reported this to MS and if I hear anything, I’ll post back on this thread.
--
***Please always reply to the newsgroup!***
Beth Rosengard
Mac MVP
Mac Word FAQ: <http://word.mvps.org/MacWordNew/index.htm>
Entourage Help Page: <http://www.entourage.mvps.org>
Phillip M. Jones, CE.T.
> Hi Phillip,
>
> I had already outlined the workaround on this thread; you didn't need to do
> it again. When I said "no answers at this point," I was referring to the
> question about exactly who needs to do a fix Adobe or MS. I see from one
> of your previous posts that you believe it to be Adobe. That would have
> been my assumption as well but in the absence of evidence, I declined to
> guess. You might want to read a little more carefully before responding
> next time.
>
typing as well. :-(
In Tha Aadobe newsgroups, this new erro message in Office is a hot topic
and they have discovered that the PDFMaker files are responsible. Slow
downs and other strange behaviours are also attributed to PDFMaker in
the newsgroup as well.
Acrobat is the one to originally install this item and will reinstall it
each time you delete it from office as soon as acrobat is openned.
Office once it discovers a file component in its install will attempt to
locate and reinstall as well.
But Adobe is responsible, the design and creation of PDFMaker.
When applications are updated conflicts are sometime going to to occur.
Now as to whether each get of the urge to say "its your fault fix" and
work together to figure out what the problem is - that's another story.
Paul Berkowitz
"Phillip M. Jones, CE.T." <pjo...@kimbanet.com> wrote:
> Thanks Beth sorry for redundant information. And also for my terible
> typing as well. :-(
For God's sake, Phillip, why don't you use a spell-checker? Your spelling,
or typing, is atrocious. My typing is also atrocious, but the Entourage
spell-checker, set to intervene on send, ensures that 95% of it gets fixed.
Look at your next sentence - it's unreadable.
>
> In Tha Aadobe newsgroups, this new erro message in Office is a hot topic
> and they have discovered that the PDFMaker files are responsible.
--
Paul Berkowitz
Burt Johnson
> On Acrobat newsgroup this is found to be caused by the PDFMaker.xla
> file. (the file that creates that &*$# PDFMaker Thingi on word,excel,
> and powerpoint menus.
>
> create a folder named PDFMaker.xla and replace the file of the same name
> with this folder. The Dratted PDFMaker will be gone forever and a day
> (Unles you remove and resinstall Office).
>
> Repeat for equivelent files in Word and Powerpoint as well.
THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU!
I came here to find out about this irritating error on quitting Excel,
but that PDFMaker in Word has bugged me for ages too. It insists on
floating below the other toolbars, and won't remember that I want it to
the right on the same level. I therefore always have new documents open
smaller and lower than I want.
I am now FREE of that stupid tool that I never used and always got in
the way! :-)
--
- Burt Johnson
MindStorm, Inc.
http://www.mindstorm-inc.com/software.html
John McGhie
Just a note of caution... While Adobe's PDFMaker is a notorious source of
irritation, it's not the only thing that "could" produce that error.
Visual Basic for Applications compiles at run-time, so you can conceivably
get this error when you first attempt to RUN any macro that has been coded
for PC Word, particularly the later versions.
If the offending module is not encrypted, Word will start a debugger which
will attempt to show you where the error is. However, if the vendor has
locked their code (as Adobe does) Word can't display the code so you get the
infuriating "Compile Error in Hidden Module". In Adobe's case, their coding
problem is in a module named "AutoExec".
AutoExec is a reserved macro name that causes Word to run the macro so named
every time it starts up, which is why we tend to find out about Adobe's
little problems immediately.
I would argue (some would say "rant"...) about PDFMaker's basic design. The
thing runs EVERY time Word starts up. It doesn't need to: once would be
sufficient. Because it runs every time, it changes your toolbars every
time, which eventually breaks your Normal template. Not a good design...
Because Adobe relies on an "Auto" macro, and you can have only one of those
operating at a time, they manage to interfere with the user's Auto macros,
which leads to a lot of time-consuming bug-hunting until you finally realise
that the reason YOUR macro doesn't run is that Adobe has one with the same
name in a hidden module you can't see. Not a kind thing to do to users...
And finally, there is no excuse for a company of Adobe's size publishing VBA
that generates compile errors. VBA supports conditional compilation, and
it's a trivial matter to code a macro so that it compiles and runs correctly
on any Microsoft Word platform. I know this because I have to do it: parts
of my macros require different code between Word 2000 and Word 2003.
</Rant>
On 16/10/04 5:28 PM, in article
1glq3tb.no0ygho60utmN%bu...@mindstorm-inc.com, "Burt Johnson"
<bu...@mindstorm-inc.com> wrote:
--
Please reply to the newsgroup to maintain the thread. Please do not email
me unless I ask you to.
John McGhie <jo...@mcghie.name>
Consultant Technical Writer
Sydney, Australia +61 4 1209 1410
Gary Menszyk
If all PDFMaker did was give you a button to create PDFs then you are
correct that it is redundant. However, that is not just what it does. If you
have links in documents, it converts the links to appropriate web links or
links to other PDF documents among other functions.
So just removing it is not an answer for a lot of people.
Gary...
in article eVr5yFks...@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl, Phillip M. Jones, CE.T. at
pjo...@kimbanet.com wrote on 10/14/04 6:59 PM:
> The Terminator wrote:
>> Yes it does work...but what if we want the PDFMaker toolbar? Did SP1
>> łbreak˛ it until Adobe fixes it?
Sam Elowitch
HS one should use with Office for Mac 2004 SP1 is the same as the one used
for Office for Mac 2004?
-Sam
BB
-Bo
On 04-10-16 16.53, in article BD96AE40.1248E%selo...@gwi.net, "Sam
Daiya Mitchell
> If all PDFMaker did was give you a button to create PDFs then you are
> correct that it is redundant. However, that is not just what it does. If you
> have links in documents, it converts the links to appropriate web links or
> links to other PDF documents among other functions.
>
> So just removing it is not an answer for a lot of people.
Yeah, I was wondering about that, although I've understood MacAcrobat has
less functionality than WinAcrobat. But apparently the Excel "compile
error" message is just a nuisance, not an actual problem, right? It also
seems that removing simply the Excel PDFMaker template fixes the problem,
which will still let you have the functions in the other apps, depending on
how many links are in your excel files.
Or, depending on how often you convert to PDF, create an applescript which
quits, switches the files around, and restarts while you take a stretch
break, so that the macros are only installed when you actually need them.
Depending on what functions you use, it is apparently also possible to open
the OS X PDF file up in Acrobat and use it to optimize the size, etc.
With luck, such workarounds would only be needed temporarily.
Phillip M. Jones, CE.T.
URL's will automatically become hot links in a word document.
But it does not transfer to Acrobat. while the text become blue and
underlined. It is not active.
I never could get PDFMaker to work be it in OS9 or OSX. So I can not
dispute your claim. I just know it was subject to easy corruption, and
caused many problems.
You can click on the Link Tool in Acrobat and create a URL Link.
Its not easy though to create a Mailto: Link in Acrobat.
Pierre Igot
As usual, we have MVPs making excuses for Microsoft whenever the
company fails to meet expectations.
Office 2004 was released in May 2004. An update posted in October 2004
doesn't qualify as an "early service release" to me -- although in
Microsoft's twisted sense of time, where it takes decades for bugs to
get fixed, it probably qualifies as "early".
The fact that this release doesn't fix an issue as obvious as the one
with Postscript fonts and the non-breaking space:
http://www.latext.com/pm/betalogue/P1246
is unacceptable. The fact that it doesn't fix the crash triggered by
utilities such as Spell Catcher or TypeIt4Me:
http://www.latext.com/pm/comments/1298_0_1_0_C/
is just bad.
But as usual, Microsoft applies its own twisted logic to user feedback
and comes up with a bloated updater that fixes very little.
And if it did fix stuff that it doesn't tell us about, then it has a
thing or two to learn about company feedback as well. Threat of
litigation my eye. The US department of justice itself wasn't able to
bring MS to justice. It's not likely that any group of users big or
small ever will.
Pierre
--
Pierre Igot
LATEXT - Literature & Visuals @ www.latext.com
BETALOGUE - Weblog at www.latext.com/pm/betalogue
"Apple Peel" Columnist @ Applelust.com
John McGhie
clue" :-)
Yes, SP1 *is* an "early" service release: the real one can usually be
expected around 12 months after the product ships.
I could explain why, but Pierre has seen the explanation a dozen times
before, and everyone else has a life to live.
The abridged version is "To do a service release you have to compile and
re-test the whole damn application suite. Rather than wait for that process
to complete, Microsoft on this occasion shipped as much as they had got
tested at this stage. The rest will come when it has been fully regression
tested."
But I don't recommend that anyone hold their breath waiting for Microsoft to
fix crashes caused by software neither Microsoft nor Apple manufactured.
Sorry everyone: I couldn't resist :-)
On 19/10/04 7:06 AM, in article
73fafb93.04101...@posting.google.com, "Pierre Igot"
<lat...@gmail.com> wrote:
--
Corentin Cras-Méneur
> Sorry everyone: I couldn't resist :-)
:->
Corentin
--
--- Mac:MS MVP (Francophone) ---
http://www.mvps.org - http://mvp.support.microsoft.com
MVPs are not MS employees - Les MVP ne travaillent pas pour MS
Remove "NoSpam" to e-mail me - Retirez "NoSpam" pour m'écrire
Corentin Cras-Méneur
Hi Pierre,
I haven't seen you in the group in a while :-) (or maybe I missed your
posts).
> As usual, we have MVPs making excuses for Microsoft whenever the
> company fails to meet expectations.
Come on Pierre... You seem to have a short memory on this one. Do you
think MVPs always support everything MS does ?? None of us ever
criticize bugs or lack of functions ??
I distinctively remember Paul posting in the groups about several other
serious issues or shortcomings. Give him some credit.
[...]
> The fact that this release doesn't fix an issue as obvious as the one
> with Postscript fonts and the non-breaking space:
>
> http://www.latext.com/pm/betalogue/P1246
>
> is unacceptable. The fact that it doesn't fix the crash triggered by
> utilities such as Spell Catcher or TypeIt4Me:
>
> http://www.latext.com/pm/comments/1298_0_1_0_C/
>
> is just bad.
Well I'm not affected by these bugs. I could as well say these are
trivial to me and I'd rather see other issues taken care of before
these. The importance you give to these issues is biased by the fact
that they affect you, isn't it ??
I'd much rather see riht to left support and have an Office Update that
doesn't trash my installation of Office (that's what the French Office X
10.1.6 updater does).
Resources are not unlimited and bug fixes as well as implementation of
new features need to be prioritized...
> Threat of
> litigation my eye. The US department of justice itself wasn't able to
> bring MS to justice. It's not likely that any group of users big or
> small ever will.
:-> again I see things in a different angle... If I quite remember, the
US department of justice failed but the European court succeeded...
You are of course entitled to your own opinion Pierre, but please don't
expect everybody to see everything the same way you do. People have
different backgrounds and are differently affected by the various
problems not yet resolved in Office.
Phillip M. Jones, CE.T.
> Pierre Igot <lat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Pierre,
>
>
> I haven't seen you in the group in a while :-) (or maybe I missed your
> posts).
>
>
>>As usual, we have MVPs making excuses for Microsoft whenever the
>>company fails to meet expectations.
>
>
> Come on Pierre... You seem to have a short memory on this one. Do you
> think MVPs always support everything MS does ?? None of us ever
> criticize bugs or lack of functions ??
> I distinctively remember Paul posting in the groups about several other
> serious issues or shortcomings. Give him some credit.
>
>
> [...]
>
>>The fact that this release doesn't fix an issue as obvious as the one
>>with Postscript fonts and the non-breaking space:
>>
>>http://www.latext.com/pm/betalogue/P1246
>>
>>is unacceptable. The fact that it doesn't fix the crash triggered by
>>utilities such as Spell Catcher or TypeIt4Me:
I use TypeIt4Me all the time with no problems with Office2004
Do you have the latest version?
>>http://www.latext.com/pm/comments/1298_0_1_0_C/
>>
>>is just bad.
>
>
> Well I'm not affected by these bugs. I could as well say these are
> trivial to me and I'd rather see other issues taken care of before
> these. The importance you give to these issues is biased by the fact
> that they affect you, isn't it ??
> I'd much rather see riht to left support and have an Office Update that
> doesn't trash my installation of Office (that's what the French Office X
> 10.1.6 updater does).
> Resources are not unlimited and bug fixes as well as implementation of
> new features need to be prioritized...
>
>
>>Threat of
>>litigation my eye. The US department of justice itself wasn't able to
>>bring MS to justice. It's not likely that any group of users big or
>>small ever will.
>
>
> :-> again I see things in a different angle... If I quite remember, the
> US department of justice failed but the European court succeeded...
>
> You are of course entitled to your own opinion Pierre, but please don't
> expect everybody to see everything the same way you do. People have
> different backgrounds and are differently affected by the various
> problems not yet resolved in Office.
>
> Corentin
>
>
>
--
Clive Huggan
dano45-297438....@msnews.microsoft.com, "dano"
<dan...@spamcop.net> wrote:
> In article <BD95D40D.76B6E%berkowit@spoof_silcom.com>,
> The problems in Phillip's typing are due to the notorious Abobe
> TypeMunger(R) v6.0 plug-in componeny of PDFmurker. This application is
> known to interfur with keyboard entries on MAC OS X, an d especially
> with MT-Newswhacker, Morzilla and Macrosfot En'rage.
>
> There is a fix awailable on the usual burgfix websites. Any luser so
> effected shuld go to the website and download the pitch. ;-)
Ho-ho-ho, Dano! A darned good long belly-laugh to start off the week!
Phillip will enjoy that one!
Cheers,
Clive Huggan
Canberra, Australia
(My time zone is at least 5 hours different from the US and Europe, so my
follow-on responses to those regions can be delayed)
============================================================