<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db</id>
  <title type="text">microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Microsoft Internet Explorer newsgroup.
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db feed"/>
  <updated>2009-12-30T19:48:38Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.com" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>inungh</name>
  <email>inu...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-30T19:48:38Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db/browse_frm/thread/75824980bc0e4290/c7f4503ff841765d?show_docid=c7f4503ff841765d</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db/browse_frm/thread/75824980bc0e4290/c7f4503ff841765d?show_docid=c7f4503ff841765d"/>
  <title type="text">Re: website asp db design</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Thanks millions for helping and information,
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Bob Barrows</name>
  <email>reb01...@noyahoo.spamcom</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-27T17:19:22Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db/browse_frm/thread/75824980bc0e4290/77d617d0e3657e7c?show_docid=77d617d0e3657e7c</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db/browse_frm/thread/75824980bc0e4290/77d617d0e3657e7c?show_docid=77d617d0e3657e7c"/>
  <title type="text">Re: website asp db design</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  It&#39;s good that you&#39;re starting off thinking about security, but there&#39;s no &lt;br&gt; point to having a second database that I can see, at least, not for the &lt;br&gt; reason you are proposing. The user is not (or should not be) directly &lt;br&gt; logging into the database. It is your server-side code that should be the &lt;br&gt; only link between the user and the database, thus giving you complete
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>inungh</name>
  <email>inu...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-26T23:11:28Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db/browse_frm/thread/75824980bc0e4290/6ca64a5286298cd7?show_docid=6ca64a5286298cd7</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db/browse_frm/thread/75824980bc0e4290/6ca64a5286298cd7?show_docid=6ca64a5286298cd7"/>
  <title type="text">website asp db design</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I would like to use SQL server as my asp website database. &lt;br&gt; I would like to know that is it a good idea to create 2 databases one &lt;br&gt; for all the link and the other one fo real database for security &lt;br&gt; reason. &lt;br&gt; Since the dynamic website must let user login when user hit the home &lt;br&gt; page to get url link information, it can avoid security issue if user
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Matthew Thornton</name>
  <email>matthewathorn...@sbcglobal.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-25T03:58:46Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db/browse_frm/thread/6280dd367c43c0c9/e0072815061bc076?show_docid=e0072815061bc076</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db/browse_frm/thread/6280dd367c43c0c9/e0072815061bc076?show_docid=e0072815061bc076"/>
  <title type="text">Economical Auction Site</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Phillip Windell</name>
  <email>philwind...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-16T18:32:16Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db/browse_frm/thread/7cf83800dd4dd176/6b595f942a34473b?show_docid=6b595f942a34473b</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db/browse_frm/thread/7cf83800dd4dd176/6b595f942a34473b?show_docid=6b595f942a34473b"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Dup entries when creating a new DB entry (ASP Classic with an MDB file)</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I would say I might be an ultraminimalist,...but it would take too long to &lt;br&gt; say it :-) &lt;br&gt; P.W.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Phillip Windell</name>
  <email>philwind...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-16T17:21:19Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db/browse_frm/thread/7cf83800dd4dd176/fdc4f1bf0fb9c5ff?show_docid=fdc4f1bf0fb9c5ff</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db/browse_frm/thread/7cf83800dd4dd176/fdc4f1bf0fb9c5ff?show_docid=fdc4f1bf0fb9c5ff"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Dup entries when creating a new DB entry (ASP Classic with an MDB file)</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I have it &amp;quot;live&amp;quot; now and so far it seems to do ok. I use NTFS permissions &lt;br&gt; to control who can use it rather than try to create a built-in &lt;br&gt; authentication/useraccounts &amp;quot;thing&amp;quot; with the ASP. I&#39;ve done that before with &lt;br&gt; other things in the past,...but I&#39;m gettng lazy. &lt;br&gt; They&#39;ll let me know if they have problems. I&#39;ll work on perfecting it with
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Neil Gould</name>
  <email>n...@myplaceofwork.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-15T22:06:08Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db/browse_frm/thread/7cf83800dd4dd176/c5be864ff28dd4ec?show_docid=c5be864ff28dd4ec</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db/browse_frm/thread/7cf83800dd4dd176/c5be864ff28dd4ec?show_docid=c5be864ff28dd4ec"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Dup entries when creating a new DB entry (ASP Classic with an MDB file)</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Good to hear that your problem is getting resolved.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Evertjan.</name>
  <email>exjxw.hannivo...@interxnl.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-15T21:26:44Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db/browse_frm/thread/7cf83800dd4dd176/b36fd95c9cdf3323?show_docid=b36fd95c9cdf3323</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db/browse_frm/thread/7cf83800dd4dd176/b36fd95c9cdf3323?show_docid=b36fd95c9cdf3323"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Dup entries when creating a new DB entry (ASP Classic with an MDB file)</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Bob Barrows wrote on 15 dec 2009 in microsoft.public.inetserver.as p.db: &lt;br&gt; Which can effectively be shortened to: &lt;br&gt; strApproved = NOT strApproved = &amp;quot;&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; or for the average minimalist to: &lt;br&gt; strApproved = strApproved &amp;lt;&amp;gt; &amp;quot;&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; or for the extreme minimalist to: &lt;br&gt; strApproved = strApproved &amp;gt; &amp;quot;&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; ============= &lt;br&gt; Some ultraminimalists would even disaprove
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Bob Barrows</name>
  <email>reb01...@noyahoo.spamcom</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-15T19:59:21Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db/browse_frm/thread/7cf83800dd4dd176/c781b643b8bcff69?show_docid=c781b643b8bcff69</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db/browse_frm/thread/7cf83800dd4dd176/c781b643b8bcff69?show_docid=c781b643b8bcff69"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Dup entries when creating a new DB entry (ASP Classic with an MDB file)</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Keeping in mind that booleans are stored as 0 or -1, I&#39;m not sure the &lt;br&gt; word &amp;quot;on&amp;quot; would be recognized. This will likely work better: &lt;br&gt; If strApproved = &amp;quot;&amp;quot; then &lt;br&gt; strApproved =false &lt;br&gt; else &lt;br&gt; strApproved =true &lt;br&gt; end if
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Bob Barrows</name>
  <email>reb01...@noyahoo.spamcom</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-15T19:20:55Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db/browse_frm/thread/7cf83800dd4dd176/f963349098cd1ccc?show_docid=f963349098cd1ccc</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db/browse_frm/thread/7cf83800dd4dd176/f963349098cd1ccc?show_docid=f963349098cd1ccc"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Dup entries when creating a new DB entry (ASP Classic with an MDB file)</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Oh duh! cDate is fine.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Phillip Windell</name>
  <email>philwind...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-15T18:58:54Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db/browse_frm/thread/7cf83800dd4dd176/e83cdbdbabc7c112?show_docid=e83cdbdbabc7c112</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db/browse_frm/thread/7cf83800dd4dd176/e83cdbdbabc7c112?show_docid=e83cdbdbabc7c112"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Dup entries when creating a new DB entry (ASP Classic with an MDB file)</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Bob found the bad spot in the code and that is fixed,..I&#39;ve just got some &lt;br&gt; other smaller (yet still annoying) issues to iron out. But the pressure is &lt;br&gt; off with the dupe thing fixed. &lt;br&gt; Thanks, Neil
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Phillip Windell</name>
  <email>philwind...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-15T18:56:40Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db/browse_frm/thread/7cf83800dd4dd176/2e50f89764cbf49e?show_docid=2e50f89764cbf49e</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db/browse_frm/thread/7cf83800dd4dd176/2e50f89764cbf49e?show_docid=2e50f89764cbf49e"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Dup entries when creating a new DB entry (ASP Classic with an MDB file)</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Ok :-) &lt;br&gt; OK... &lt;br&gt; OK... &lt;br&gt; That&#39;s what I was kinda attempting with cDate() but I know it needs to be &lt;br&gt; better than that. I&#39;ll work on that later on. &lt;br&gt; I wish I would have kept a better record of what it did but I didn&#39;t. I &lt;br&gt; just remember both the Insert and the Update queries had problems,...and one &lt;br&gt; of them complained about a Type Mismatch in one of my attempts.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Bob Barrows</name>
  <email>reb01...@noyahoo.spamcom</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-15T15:51:44Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db/browse_frm/thread/7cf83800dd4dd176/0b92e4398b9dbc4f?show_docid=0b92e4398b9dbc4f</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db/browse_frm/thread/7cf83800dd4dd176/0b92e4398b9dbc4f?show_docid=0b92e4398b9dbc4f"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Dup entries when creating a new DB entry (ASP Classic with an MDB file)</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Well, that is a good thing to do, but ... I tested the code on my &lt;br&gt; machine and it definitely generated an error message when I left the &lt;br&gt; fields blank ... oh, wait! I left out the line I had to add to &lt;br&gt; initialize the strErrorMsg variable: &lt;br&gt; strErrorMsg = &amp;quot;&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; If If Document.frmNewEntry.txtTitle. Value = ... &lt;br&gt; Again, you don&#39;t have to do it in Access Design View (although it is
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Phillip Windell</name>
  <email>philwind...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-15T15:30:18Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db/browse_frm/thread/7cf83800dd4dd176/8eb472b6b7790b42?show_docid=8eb472b6b7790b42</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db/browse_frm/thread/7cf83800dd4dd176/8eb472b6b7790b42?show_docid=8eb472b6b7790b42"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Dup entries when creating a new DB entry (ASP Classic with an MDB file)</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Very good. That fixed the dupes issue. However I tested the error message &lt;br&gt; part of it by intensionally leaving a field blank,...no error message like &lt;br&gt; there should have been,....and it posted to the database with the blank &lt;br&gt; entry instead of canceling the submit. I&#39;m running out of patients with the
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Bob Barrows</name>
  <email>reb01...@noyahoo.spamcom</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-15T14:48:16Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db/browse_frm/thread/7cf83800dd4dd176/ef61688a4277aaeb?show_docid=ef61688a4277aaeb</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db/browse_frm/thread/7cf83800dd4dd176/ef61688a4277aaeb?show_docid=ef61688a4277aaeb"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Dup entries when creating a new DB entry (ASP Classic with an MDB file)</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  You don&#39;t have to do this in Design view: you can do it via SQL DDL if &lt;br&gt; you like: &lt;br&gt; CREATE UNIQUE INDEX IX_Events_Unique &lt;br&gt; ON tblEvents (fldStartDate ASC, fldTitle ASC)
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
