info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Check Signature - Internal Control - Authorization Level
40 views
Skip to first unread message
Disbursement Signature Controls@discussions.microsoft.com Check Disbursement Signature Controls
Jun 27, 2005, 1:13:01 PM6/27/05
to
There should be builit into the check disbursement function(s) certain
internal controls. Example, allowing for restrictions - authorization levels
as it relates to dollar amounts. Either, the 'graphics' loaded for signature
do not appear when exceeding a certain amount (check signature does not
print), requiring manual signature or the check disbursement, when exceeding
a specified amount, should require a 2nd level authorization (password)
before proceeding w/the processing function.
internal controls. Example, allowing for restrictions - authorization levels
as it relates to dollar amounts. Either, the 'graphics' loaded for signature
do not appear when exceeding a certain amount (check signature does not
print), requiring manual signature or the check disbursement, when exceeding
a specified amount, should require a 2nd level authorization (password)
before proceeding w/the processing function.
----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.
Lyle
Jun 27, 2005, 2:23:12 PM6/27/05
to
In article <E46AF449-B6DF-48C2...@microsoft.com>, "=?Utf-
8?B?Q2hlY2sgRGlzYnVyc2VtZW50IFNpZ25hdHVyZSBDb250cm9scw==?=" <Check
Disbursement Signature Cont...@discussions.microsoft.com> says...If this is really important, have a look at the Mekorma MICR offering. I
can vouch for the ease of setup and use, the ease of cheque form
modifications, the excellent integration with GP, and on the one time
that it was needed, the excellent support.
8?B?Q2hlY2sgRGlzYnVyc2VtZW50IFNpZ25hdHVyZSBDb250cm9scw==?=" <Check
Disbursement Signature Cont...@discussions.microsoft.com> says...
can vouch for the ease of setup and use, the ease of cheque form
modifications, the excellent integration with GP, and on the one time
that it was needed, the excellent support.
Here is their web address: http://www.mekorma.com
Lyle
Check Disbursement Signature Controls
Jun 27, 2005, 3:36:01 PM6/27/05
to
*I should mention - we currently use Mekorma to satisfy this need.
Check Disbursement Signature Controls
Jun 27, 2005, 3:40:03 PM6/27/05
to
Thank you. We currently use Mekorma to satisfy this need. We were looking
to GP to incorporate this control thus relieving the need for 3rd party
software.
to GP to incorporate this control thus relieving the need for 3rd party
software.
Charles Allen
Jul 1, 2005, 11:12:00 PM7/1/05
to
I understand the desire to use one publisher but I think you are fighting a
battle everytime you do that. The third party products, like Mekorma's MICR
application, is so much more powerful than what GP offers. Also, remember
that many third party apps wind up as GP applications like HR,
Manufacturing, Project Accounting, Extender, SmartList, SmartList Builder,
and many others.
battle everytime you do that. The third party products, like Mekorma's MICR
application, is so much more powerful than what GP offers. Also, remember
that many third party apps wind up as GP applications like HR,
Manufacturing, Project Accounting, Extender, SmartList, SmartList Builder,
and many others.
"Check Disbursement Signature Controls"
<CheckDisbursement...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:0821F511-BBA2-4304...@microsoft.com...
0 new messages