Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Information Stores won't mount
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Martin Chisholm [ MSFT ]  
View profile  
 More options Jan 7 2005, 1:56 am
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.exchange.misc, microsoft.public.exchange2000.information.store
From: Martin Chisholm [MSFT] <mart...@online.microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 06:56:05 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Fri, Jan 7 2005 1:56 am
Subject: Re: Information Stores won't mount

Erik, I'm glad your problem is solved.

But to beat the proverbial dead horse:

The error you got was likely:

  JET_errInvalidCreateDbVersion
# /* recovery tried to replay a database creation, but the
# database was originally created with an incompatible
# (likely older) version of the database engine */

We fixed this after 2003 SP1. I don't know if it made it to a
QFE/hotfix, or if it will just be in 2003 SP2.

Now for a Very Brief History of JET:

The JET that Exchange uses is 'JET Blue'.
The JET that people usually talk about is 'JET Red'.

JET Red is the one that the other applications would be using. It's
the one that would have the SP8.

JET Blue is now called ESE. It lives in ese.dll and eseutil.exe goes
along with it.

The two JETs had a bit in common many years ago, but now they're so
different the name is probably the biggest thing they have in common.

They each have their strengths and weaknesses, but I'd say that ESE
(JET Blue) is much better. I'm also biased because I work on
it. :)

-martin

Boring-but-necessary-disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with
no warranties, and confers no rights.

In article <#vM3aZA9EHA.2...@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>,

Erik Rossou <e...@xxxrossou.nl> wrote:

>Seth,

>Thanks for the help.

>I deleted the edb and stm file. Then tried to mount the Mailbox Store. Like
>you said it reported the missing files, and created new ones. I never new it
>would be this easy.

>Erik

>"seth" <m...@myhouse.com> wrote in message
>news:%23Ru2vZ$8EHA.2552@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> well, i'd say you got nothing to lose since you say the store hasn't been
>> used and has no mail in it
>> the first thing i'd do is remove the mail properties from each user; that
>> way AD won't have any info about mailboxes for any user
>> not sure if you will have any problems with the store dismounted.
>> theoretically you wouldn't since if the store would to come back up, it
>> would just report in esm that the mailbox just isn't associated with a
>> user account.
>> if you get past that, then just go in esm and delete the store and create
>> a new one. it will automatically create the edb and stm files for you,
>> then you can go in to ad for each user and recreate the mailboxes and
>> aliases

>> "Erik Rossou" <e...@xxxrossou.nl> wrote in message
>> news:OY%23Ie038EHA.2788@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>>>A cry for help from an Exchange novice.

>>> I admit, I made some terrible mistakes. But hopefuly with your help I
>>> will
>>> be able to recover. Here is my story

>>> I got single new hardware-platform to replace 2 aging servers (one for
>>> Exchange and one for IIS). I decided to use this new hardware platform
>>> for
>>> running both Microsoft Exchange 2003 and about 20 websites using IIS6. I
>>> made my life easy by deciding that we would not migrate anything from the
>>> old Exchange server to the new one (no data and no settings).

>>> I first installed Windows Server 2003 and Microsoft Exchange 2003 + SP1.
>>> Then I manually re-created the 5 user accounts in Active Directory with
>>> in
>>> total about 50 e-mail aliases. I then moved on installing additional
>>> software tools without checking my Exchange installation. Big mistake as
>>> was
>>> proven afterwards, because now I don't know whether the Exchange
>>> installtion
>>> was fully functional at that time.

>>> I then installed about 20 websites of which 3 have a web-application that
>>> also uses the Jet-engine to access the application's repository.

>>> At that point I moved the Exchange databases to a new directory (again
>>> without checking if the move went well). Don't ask me why I didn't check
>>> that (I feel stupid enough as it is!). I guess I was over-confident all
>>> went
>>> well.

>>> On top of that I had a power failure on the Dell PowerEdge.

>>> Now my problem:

>>> 1. Exchange won't mount the Mailbox Stores suggesting that I restart the
>>> Exchange IS service which I did, but that did not solve the problem

>>> 2. The Microsoft Knowledge Base tells me to use Eseutil. Eseutil tells me
>>> that the database is in a 'Dirty Shutdown' mode. It suggests that I use
>>> Eseutil to repair the priv1.edb file. I tried but Eseutil then complains
>>> that it can't do the repair because 'the database was created using an
>>> incompatible (likely older) version of the Jet database engine'. I have
>>> got
>>> no clue how the Jet engine version got changed somewhere in between.

>>> 3. I then downloaded and ran SP8 for the Jet engine hoping to solve the
>>> problem, but no luck.

>>> 4. I then re-installed Exchange 2003 and also reinstalled SP1, no luck
>>> again

>>> Now my proposed solution:
>>> The Exchange database holds no e-mail, because it has never been used so
>>> far. I assume all account details (user accounts and e-mail aliases are
>>> stored in AD).

>>> Won't the easiest solution be to just discard the damaged Exchange
>>> edb-files
>>> and stm-files (both for the Mailbox Store and the Public Folder Store)
>>> and
>>> somehow re-create these from scratch?

>>> Any suggestions on my proposed solution? And ofcourse a suggestion on how
>>> to
>>> re-create the edb-files and stm-files?

>>> Thanks,

>>> Erik

>>> p.s. This has been a great learning experience


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.