Is there a way to configure Excel 2000 so that when I create a new Workbook or add a new Worksheet so that all the columns have a particular width instead of the default 64 pixels?
Open a blank workbook. Change the Column Widths for all Columns to 64 pixels Name the File Book Then, Save the file as a Template (choose Template from the Save As Type box located beneath the filename Box. Browse for your xlStart folder and Save the new Template in this folder. It will become the Default for all future workbooks.
If you can't find the xlStart folder, try doing a Windows Search (from the start menu) telling it to Search for Hidden Files and Folders, System Folders, everything.
"Bruceh" wrote: > Is there a way to configure Excel 2000 so that when I create > a new Workbook or add a new Worksheet so that all the columns > have a particular width instead of the default 64 pixels?
Create the workbook exactly the way you want it, then save it as a template with the name "Book.xlt" (no quotes) in you XLStart directory. It'll be then used as the template for new workbooks.
Likewise, save a one-sheet workbook as a template, named "Sheet.xlt" for the template for Insert/Worksheet.
In article <419E181F.6251D...@nospam.net>, Bruceh <br...@nospam.net> wrote:
> Is there a way to configure Excel 2000 so that when I create > a new Workbook or add a new Worksheet so that all the columns > have a particular width instead of the default 64 pixels?
tjtjjtjt wrote: > Open a blank workbook. > Change the Column Widths for all Columns to 64 pixels > Name the File Book > Then, Save the file as a Template (choose Template from the Save As Type box > located beneath the filename Box. > Browse for your xlStart folder and Save the new Template in this folder. It > will become the Default for all future workbooks.
> If you can't find the xlStart folder, try doing a Windows Search (from the > start menu) telling it to Search for Hidden Files and Folders, System > Folders, everything.
> tj
> "Bruceh" wrote:
> > Is there a way to configure Excel 2000 so that when I create > > a new Workbook or add a new Worksheet so that all the columns > > have a particular width instead of the default 64 pixels?
> > TIA
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Bruce Hatakeyama mailto:bhatakey...@att.net ----------------------------------------------------------------------
How does one determine a "64 pixel" width, or any "xx pixel" width or height?
Doesn't it change with the Windows Display Resolution and size of default fonts?
I never could determine a direct link between 72 pts to the inch and pixels per inch.
I google and see many different interpretations like .75 pixels to a point and 96 to an inch but all estimates are qualified with "depending upon resolution".
How about the default width of 8.43?
What is that in pixels? 64?
This is a serious request. I would like to know, please.
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:33:59 -0700, JE McGimpsey <jemcgimp...@mvps.org> wrote: >Create the workbook exactly the way you want it, then save it as a >template with the name "Book.xlt" (no quotes) in you XLStart directory. >It'll be then used as the template for new workbooks.
>Likewise, save a one-sheet workbook as a template, named "Sheet.xlt" for >the template for Insert/Worksheet.
>> Is there a way to configure Excel 2000 so that when I create >> a new Workbook or add a new Worksheet so that all the columns >> have a particular width instead of the default 64 pixels?
You'll note that I wrote "Create the workbook exactly the way you want it".
You're right - pixels are almost impossible to work with. Graphics have their own pixels per inch setting. Monitors have a set maximum number of pixels per inch, but of course you can set the resolution to display a different # of pixels per inch. In addition, while Macs equate points and pixels per inch (i.e., 72 pixels/points per inch), Windows does an automatic magnification (on almost everything *except* graphics) to display 96 pixels per inch (points don't change). So a 12 point font *generally* displays 16 pixels high. Because of that, web browsers, (which may have a pixels per inch setting of their own), in order to print, guess which platform/combination they're running on, and scale a printout accordingly (though not always correctly).
I've found that, most of the time, when people mention "pixels" with regard to column width, they mean "points", or rather something like points that will stay relatively constant. So I assume that the OP wanted the width of the column to be either 64 points or 64*(4/3) = 85.3 points.
Of course, Excel doesn't measure column width in points (except, sort of, in Mac XL 2004). <g>
Instead, it sets it in character *widths* (using the "0" for proportional fonts), so for my default of Verdana 10, the default 10 characters corresponds to 1.04" or 74.88 points. If I instead set my default font to Courier New 12, the default 10 character widths is also 1.04", since the character widths are the same. OTOH, if I set the default font to Verdana 12, the default width becomes 1.18" or 84.96 points. Again, this reflects the character *widths*, not heights, since 1.04" * 12/10 = 1.248", not 1.18"
In XL04, you *can* set the column widths directly in inches or centimeters (since it assumes that the screen is at 72 ppi, and fonts don't get scaled as in Windows). So you can set the column width directly to 64/72 inches, or 0.89". The number of width units will obviously vary with the font size.
In article <324tp0979m0si1mlkcib6kabsa7ose2...@4ax.com>, Gord Dibben <gorddibbATshawDOTca> wrote:
> How does one determine a "64 pixel" width, or any "xx pixel" width or height?
> Doesn't it change with the Windows Display Resolution and size of default > fonts?
> I never could determine a direct link between 72 pts to the inch and pixels > per inch.
> I google and see many different interpretations like .75 pixels to a point and > 96 to an inch but all estimates are qualified with "depending upon > resolution".
> How about the default width of 8.43?
> What is that in pixels? 64?
> This is a serious request. I would like to know, please.
Personally I just use "pixel" width as reference to see if one column is the same size another.
I never equate the number of pixels to inches. I just do a Print Preview and see how the columns fit on the page. If it doesn't I adjust: * Margins * Headers/Footers * Individual column widths * Scale %
Gord Dibben wrote: > John and/or anybody out there
> How does one determine a "64 pixel" width, or any "xx pixel" width or height?
> Doesn't it change with the Windows Display Resolution and size of default > fonts?
> I never could determine a direct link between 72 pts to the inch and pixels > per inch.
> I google and see many different interpretations like .75 pixels to a point and > 96 to an inch but all estimates are qualified with "depending upon > resolution".
> How about the default width of 8.43?
> What is that in pixels? 64?
> This is a serious request. I would like to know, please.
> Gord Dibben Excel MVP
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:33:59 -0700, JE McGimpsey <jemcgimp...@mvps.org> wrote:
> >Create the workbook exactly the way you want it, then save it as a > >template with the name "Book.xlt" (no quotes) in you XLStart directory. > >It'll be then used as the template for new workbooks.
> >Likewise, save a one-sheet workbook as a template, named "Sheet.xlt" for > >the template for Insert/Worksheet.
> >> Is there a way to configure Excel 2000 so that when I create > >> a new Workbook or add a new Worksheet so that all the columns > >> have a particular width instead of the default 64 pixels?
In article <419F8A4A.50C46...@nospam.net>, bruceh <bru...@nospam.net> wrote:
> Personally I just use "pixel" width as reference to see if one column is > the same size another.
That's a curious choice, since Excel doesn't allow you to directly set column widths in anything like pixels. When you asked to set the default column width to "64 pixels", how did you choose 64?
Also, realize that when you create and use your own definitions without letting your audience know, you potentially waste the time of those you're asking for help.
> I never equate the number of pixels to inches. I just do a Print Preview > and see how the columns fit on the page. If it doesn't I adjust: > * Margins > * Headers/Footers > * Individual column widths > * Scale %
The nice thing about XL04 is that you can change the first 3 of those in Page Layout view and see immediately how it will print.
JE McGimpsey wrote: > In article <419F8A4A.50C46...@nospam.net>, bruceh <bru...@nospam.net> > wrote:
> > Personally I just use "pixel" width as reference to see if one column is > > the same size another.
> That's a curious choice, since Excel doesn't allow you to directly set > column widths in anything like pixels. When you asked to set the default > column width to "64 pixels", how did you choose 64?
> Also, realize that when you create and use your own definitions without > letting your audience know, you potentially waste the time of those > you're asking for help.
He's not using his own definitions. By moving the mouse between two column headers (e.g. between column B & C) the icon should change indicating you can change the width of the column. As you change the width, a hint displays indicating something like: Width: 8.43 (64 pixels)
Also, 64 pixels is the width of the columns when a new workbook/worksheet is created. At least it is with Excel 2000. Perhaps Excel 2004 doesn't have this feature or is displayed in another format. I use 2000 like the OP.
My apologies - I forgot that WinXL showed the value in "pixels" - I've never relied on them since they don't seem to correlate to any "real" pixels, and you can't set column widths in pixels.
You're right, MacXL shows the column widths in characters and inches/centimeters. Those measurements, however, conform to how the sheet prints out. For instance, setting the left and right margins at 1.25" and column widths at 1" will print 6 columns across on standard US Letter paper, taking up the full 8.5". The same doesn't happen when I set the same margins and the column width to the value corresponding to 96 pixels in XL03, however - I get only 5 columns until I shrink the margins to about 1.1".
FWIW, I never use the default workbook in either Mac or WinXL - I have a custom workbook that I use as a template for both.
BillWill <b...@earthlink.net> wrote: > He's not using his own definitions. By moving the mouse between > two column headers (e.g. between column B & C) the icon should > change indicating you can change the width of the column. As you > change the width, a hint displays indicating something like: > Width: 8.43 (64 pixels)
> Also, 64 pixels is the width of the columns when a new workbook/worksheet > is created. At least it is with Excel 2000. Perhaps Excel 2004 doesn't have > this feature or is displayed in another format. I use 2000 like the OP.
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 20:12:19 -0800, BillWill <b...@earthlink.net> wrote: >JE McGimpsey wrote:
>> In article <419F8A4A.50C46...@nospam.net>, bruceh <bru...@nospam.net> >> wrote:
>> > Personally I just use "pixel" width as reference to see if one column is >> > the same size another.
>> That's a curious choice, since Excel doesn't allow you to directly set >> column widths in anything like pixels. When you asked to set the default >> column width to "64 pixels", how did you choose 64?
>> Also, realize that when you create and use your own definitions without >> letting your audience know, you potentially waste the time of those >> you're asking for help.
>He's not using his own definitions. By moving the mouse between >two column headers (e.g. between column B & C) the icon should >change indicating you can change the width of the column. As you >change the width, a hint displays indicating something like: > Width: 8.43 (64 pixels)
>Also, 64 pixels is the width of the columns when a new workbook/worksheet >is created. At least it is with Excel 2000. Perhaps Excel 2004 doesn't have >this feature or is displayed in another format. I use 2000 like the OP.