<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>microsoft.public.dotnet.security Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.security</link>
  <description>Microsoft .NET technology newsgroup.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>creating a folder with specific security permissions</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.security/browse_thread/thread/5e685ea9d55fdf24/94b55eb88d587757?show_docid=94b55eb88d587757</link>
  <description>
  hi, &lt;br&gt; I want to create a folder with Administrator and SYSTEM group having full &lt;br&gt; control for both. and I even want it to be not inheritable. &lt;br&gt; The folder like C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32 same property I want to impose in the &lt;br&gt; newly created directory. &lt;br&gt; checked with MSDN api&#39;s. ConvertStringSecurityDescripto rToSecurityDescriptor
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.security/browse_thread/thread/5e685ea9d55fdf24/94b55eb88d587757?show_docid=94b55eb88d587757</guid>
  <author>
  sou...@discussions.microsoft.com
  (Soumen)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 10:07:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Free Antivirus</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.security/browse_thread/thread/4de81c47242221f8/9779443185bf336a?show_docid=9779443185bf336a</link>
  <description>
  Although this appears to nave nothing to do with .NET, I had a similar &lt;br&gt; experience with Avast when building a couple of new Win 7 PC&#39;s and &lt;br&gt; installing Avast from a previously downloaded install package. &lt;br&gt; It was solved when I forced an online update to the latest available &lt;br&gt; subversion of Avast. Note that the automatic update facility provided by
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.security/browse_thread/thread/4de81c47242221f8/9779443185bf336a?show_docid=9779443185bf336a</guid>
  <author>
  pvd...@toadstool.edu
  (PvdG42)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 16:37:42 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Click Once Deployment</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.security/browse_thread/thread/3ab35eebd3dac634/afd442e549e424c5?show_docid=afd442e549e424c5</link>
  <description>
  I need to create a long term certificate for my intranet Windows App which &lt;br&gt; uses a ClickOnce Deployment method. I can create a certificate .cer file &lt;br&gt; (goes to the C:\) and a .pvk file (goes to the C:\) using I use &lt;br&gt; makecert.exe. I need to create the .pfx key. .I am tryiong to use &lt;br&gt; pvk2pfx.exe to create the .pfx. However, when I run it in the command it
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.security/browse_thread/thread/3ab35eebd3dac634/afd442e549e424c5?show_docid=afd442e549e424c5</guid>
  <author>
  j...@msn.com
  (jd)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 18:28:50 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Free Antivirus</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.security/browse_thread/thread/4de81c47242221f8/ece673ca4e6c2b52?show_docid=ece673ca4e6c2b52</link>
  <description>
  I received a message from windows security saying Cyperdender is on but is &lt;br&gt; reporting its status to windows security center in a format that is &lt;br&gt; no longer supported and that the virus protection is incompatible. &lt;br&gt; I have been reading the posts which are very helpful and I notice &lt;br&gt; Cyberdefender is not mentioned anywhere. Should I be uninstalling
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.security/browse_thread/thread/4de81c47242221f8/ece673ca4e6c2b52?show_docid=ece673ca4e6c2b52</guid>
  <author>
  ca...@discussions.microsoft.com
  (calic)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 19:59:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Socket security like HttpWebRequest</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.security/browse_thread/thread/2b6c24e41f2474ec/b5333ea17b6c8519?show_docid=b5333ea17b6c8519</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;m not sure. Try it and see if you can get it to work. &lt;br&gt; I think you would probably have SSL on the &amp;quot;outside&amp;quot; of the stream if you &lt;br&gt; were to do that but I don&#39;t know. If you do try it, I suggest you avoid &lt;br&gt; using the features on NegotiateStream to add channel encryption and signing. &lt;br&gt; You don&#39;t want that done twice.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.security/browse_thread/thread/2b6c24e41f2474ec/b5333ea17b6c8519?show_docid=b5333ea17b6c8519</guid>
  <author>
  joseph.e.kap...@removethis.accenture.com
  (Joe Kaplan)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:14:28 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Socket security like HttpWebRequest</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.security/browse_thread/thread/2b6c24e41f2474ec/4254cdaa218e23fe?show_docid=4254cdaa218e23fe</link>
  <description>
  ok one more question can we use both NegotiateStream and SSLStream together. &lt;br&gt; Means we pass NetworkStream of TcpipClient into NegotiateStream and &lt;br&gt; NegotiateStream into SSLStream. can this be done. &lt;br&gt; Thanks &lt;br&gt; Mubashir
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.security/browse_thread/thread/2b6c24e41f2474ec/4254cdaa218e23fe?show_docid=4254cdaa218e23fe</guid>
  <author>
  mubashirk...@discussions.microsoft.com
  (Mubashir Khan)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 05:43:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Socket security like HttpWebRequest</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.security/browse_thread/thread/2b6c24e41f2474ec/51dfe69ef68e9025?show_docid=51dfe69ef68e9025</link>
  <description>
  NegotiateStream will allow you to use Negotiate authentication (integrated &lt;br&gt; auth). You can also supply plaintext creds. Otherwise similar to SslStream.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.security/browse_thread/thread/2b6c24e41f2474ec/51dfe69ef68e9025?show_docid=51dfe69ef68e9025</guid>
  <author>
  joseph.e.kap...@removethis.accenture.com
  (Joe Kaplan)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:09:15 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>The Microsoft</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.security/browse_thread/thread/5554901de5171111/cc6db77e1488c300?show_docid=cc6db77e1488c300</link>
  <description>
  Hi we have a project that is running fin on the server itself under the admin &lt;br&gt; account and also on the developper computer but soon as we are trying to &lt;br&gt; access it from another computer in the network we are getting The Microsoft &lt;br&gt; Jet database engine cannot open the file. &lt;br&gt; The mdb file is located on a shared drive \\server\public$\foldername
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.security/browse_thread/thread/5554901de5171111/cc6db77e1488c300?show_docid=cc6db77e1488c300</guid>
  <author>
  j...@discussions.microsoft.com
  (Jas)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:06:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Socket security like HttpWebRequest</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.security/browse_thread/thread/2b6c24e41f2474ec/df949235e8defa47?show_docid=df949235e8defa47</link>
  <description>
  We have noticed that HttpWebRequest uses the Credentials property and Proxy &lt;br&gt; property to perform security checks. Could any one help us that we subclass &lt;br&gt; socket with these properties. we have used SSLStream but that uses SSL not &lt;br&gt; the security techniques used by HttpWebRequest. Can anyone help us on how we
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.security/browse_thread/thread/2b6c24e41f2474ec/df949235e8defa47?show_docid=df949235e8defa47</guid>
  <author>
  mubashirk...@discussions.microsoft.com
  (Mubashir Khan)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:39:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Arhitecture for external .Net services to communicate with interna</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.security/browse_thread/thread/304c54ea5032086a/18499567ce3ca111?show_docid=18499567ce3ca111</link>
  <description>
  What is needed, if possible, to set up an environment where we can place .Net &lt;br&gt; services on the external side of the firewall (reacahable for our internet &lt;br&gt; server), that can communicate and retrieve data throug .Net services on the &lt;br&gt; inernal side of the firewall? &lt;br&gt; Currently, the few solution our company have where external partners are
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.security/browse_thread/thread/304c54ea5032086a/18499567ce3ca111?show_docid=18499567ce3ca111</guid>
  <author>
  lorentsnordvarh...@discussions.microsoft.com
  (Lorents Nord-Varhaug)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:09:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: CurrentPrincipal</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.security/browse_thread/thread/8c6719c5d1ccccf2/946e7d57ddca7a75?show_docid=946e7d57ddca7a75</link>
  <description>
  Are you getting a security exception or a casting error? I&#39;m wondering if &lt;br&gt; it&#39;s significant that both those OS versions are UAC.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.security/browse_thread/thread/8c6719c5d1ccccf2/946e7d57ddca7a75?show_docid=946e7d57ddca7a75</guid>
  <author>
  ph...@wonderware.nospam.com
  (Wilson, Phil)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:42:17 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>CurrentPrincipal</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.security/browse_thread/thread/8c6719c5d1ccccf2/404bb59630d32115?show_docid=404bb59630d32115</link>
  <description>
  When is this castable to a WindowsPrincipal? I was working on some &lt;br&gt; sample code that looks like this: &lt;br&gt; System.Security.Principal.Wind owsPrincipal principal = &lt;br&gt; (WindowsPrincipal)System.Threa ding.Thread.CurrentPrincipal; &lt;br&gt; However, this throws an exception on two different systems, one (running &lt;br&gt; Vista Ultimate) that is a member of a domain and I am logged in as a
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.security/browse_thread/thread/8c6719c5d1ccccf2/404bb59630d32115?show_docid=404bb59630d32115</guid>
  <author>
  budd...@excite.com
  (APA)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 03:39:24 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: code signing</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.security/browse_thread/thread/1998bf818f8e48b8/72c2b624d29b1837?show_docid=72c2b624d29b1837</link>
  <description>
  Hi, &lt;br&gt; as far as I know, the email address is taken from the certificate. So you &lt;br&gt; would need an E=someem...@address.com component in the subject of your &lt;br&gt; certificate. &lt;br&gt; Kind regards, &lt;br&gt; Henning Krause
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.security/browse_thread/thread/1998bf818f8e48b8/72c2b624d29b1837?show_docid=72c2b624d29b1837</guid>
  <author>
  hkrause_rem...@this.infinitec.de
  (Henning Krause)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:13:22 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: code signing</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.security/browse_thread/thread/1998bf818f8e48b8/6df56fed4334a1d7?show_docid=6df56fed4334a1d7</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;m not sure, but if you specify that in the /d argument, does it work?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.security/browse_thread/thread/1998bf818f8e48b8/6df56fed4334a1d7?show_docid=6df56fed4334a1d7</guid>
  <author>
  joseph.e.kap...@removethis.accenture.com
  (Joe Kaplan)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:30:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>code signing</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.security/browse_thread/thread/1998bf818f8e48b8/ceec1b91f6b11c21?show_docid=ceec1b91f6b11c21</link>
  <description>
  I am signing my application exe with signtool. can any one advise me how to &lt;br&gt; specify the email address in the code signing certificate? right now it &lt;br&gt; shows as &amp;quot;not available&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; is there a newsgroup i should be directing this question ? advise thanks
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.security/browse_thread/thread/1998bf818f8e48b8/ceec1b91f6b11c21?show_docid=ceec1b91f6b11c21</guid>
  <author>
  s...@discussions.microsoft.com
  (skg)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:42:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
