microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp Google Group

zu geld machen , american poker gratis spielen , kartenspiele , schnell geld verdinnen , geld mit dem internet , gratis online spiele , online poker spielen ohne , poker tournaments , gammonempire , online spiele gewinnen ,

2009-11-12T20:29:19Z

zu geld machen , american poker gratis spielen , kartenspiele ,
schnell geld verdinnen , geld mit dem internet , gratis online
spiele , online poker spielen ohne , poker tournaments ,
gammonempire , online spiele gewinnen ,
*
*
*
+++ GELD ONLINE VERDIENEN +++ GELD IM INTERNET VERDIENEN +++
*
[link]

Re: const

2009-11-12T19:29:10Z

Zach wrote:
Re-reading this message thread, I believe I may have overreacted to the
above. I apologize for that.
That said, it is still my opinion that you are overstating the benefit
and understating the difficulty of implementing "const" in C#.
As far as specific statements in the OP are concerned:

Re: const

2009-11-12T19:29:15Z

Since I know how to use Google, I went ahead and did some browsing.
Here are three links that provide at least some insight into the design
process:
[link]
[link]
[link]

Re: Data files with a personal extension

2009-11-12T19:19:41Z

Thank you.
But if the user makes a double click in the data file, how is it passed to
my app?
"Patrice" <[link]> escribió en el mensaje de
noticias news:%23PS52o6YKHA.1336@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

Simple way to restore object relationships after deserialization?

2009-11-12T19:19:02Z

I'm working with XML serialization of hierarchical objects such as the
following:
public class OuterClass
{
InnerClass _inner;
public InnerClass Inner
{ get {return _inner;}
set {_inner = value;}
}
public class InnerClass
{ OuterClass _parentouter;
[XmlIgnore()]
public OuterClass ParentOuter

Re: Checking for GUI overload

2009-11-12T19:03:45Z

Ty wrote:
Probably. You seem to have added quite a bit of additional complexity
to what should not be that complex a problem. That's usually a
maintenance "no-no".
In addition to being unnecessarily complex, you are also subject to
significant experimental error. There are all sorts of reasons a call

Re: XAML DataTrigger problem

2009-11-12T19:03:38Z

I'm waiting for 'IsModified' to change.
Oooooh, 'someFlag' changed.
Why should I care if 'someFlag' changes?
Nothing to do with me, I'm waiting for 'IsModified' to change.

Re: Compile in directly Assembler a C# application

2009-11-12T18:54:02Z

Some caveats:
-- ngen.exe doesn't "bypass IL" per se as the OP asked for; it
simply takes the IL-to-native step and causes it to happen earlier
-- the original IL still must be present and takes precedent; if
any dependency that exists for the IL changes, the pre-compiled native
code will be ignore, and the assembly will be JIT-ted normally

Re: Monitor method call

2009-11-12T18:27:38Z

It's called profiling.

Re: ContextMenu

2009-11-12T17:13:42Z

I think I blamed the wrong thing. It's a bug in the System.Windows.Forms
library, not Visual Studio. My deepest, dirt-licking apologies to the Visual
Studio team....

Re: Inverse DFT

2009-11-12T16:32:55Z

I'm sure if you were to post the code we could give you a lot of
suggestions. Also, have you considered using DllImport to call the
BLAS routine for your particular CPU?

C# and microsoft SMO

2009-11-12T16:30:54Z

Hi I have To Questions and hope can be pointed in the Right Direction
Im working with the Sql Studio Smo
Microsoft.SqlServer.Management .Smo;
1. When Scripting out Views is there a Way to Get the Select From Table name
other than parsing the Scripted View
2. is there a way to tell Smo to Script to a New Name when

Propertygrid and available cultures for a application

2009-11-12T16:17:39Z

Hello,
I've search and search but not found a solution for my problem. I have three
resource languages in my application and want the user to decided wich
language the user use or choose the invariant option. The question for me is
how to bind the available languages to a propertygrid so that the user have

Re: const

2009-11-12T16:02:12Z

I seem to remember reading just such a rational a couple of years ago,
but, sadly, I cannot remember anything about it. I do think they
considered including it at one time, though.
More to the point, version 4 of the .Net Framework is going to include
"code contracts," which may address some of the reasons for having

Re: ContextMenu

2009-11-12T15:50:12Z

"Yes, but...."
I have retrieved the control that opened the context menu (a picture box in
this case) with code like this:
private void SomeContextMenuItem_Click(obje ct sender, EventArgs e)
{
ToolStripMenuItem item = (ToolStripMenuItem)sender;
PictureBox source =
(PictureBox)((ContextMenuStrip )item.Owner).SourceControl;