Is such data storable in a database at
all? Or would it be more suitable to
create dynamic anchors to a directory
where all the MOV's and GIF's are put?
I'm imaging that when a request like:
http://localhost/fileID_A3DF.aspx
is issued, the document created will be
something like:
<other stuff>
<img src="A3DF.gif>
<embed src = "A3DF.mov" height = 135
width = 155></embed>
<other stuff>
I'm assuming that a part of the file name,
namely "fileID_A3DF.aspx", can easily be
extracted and its four last characters
used as an in-parameter, i.e. "A3DF" in a
call to a database.
Please comment if you can suggest any
improvements to that approach.
--
Regards
Konrad Viltersten
--------------------------------
sleep - a substitute for coffee for the poor
ambition - lack of sense to be lazy
> I'd like to build up a HTML-document using a database BUT the tricky part
> is that one
> of the elements is a MOV-file. The other three, four are GIF-files.
OK.
> Is such data storable in a database at all?
Yes,
> Or would it be more suitable to create dynamic anchors to a directory
> where all the MOV's and GIF's are put?
"Suitable" is perhaps the wrong adjective... There are arguments both for
and against storing binary files in databases. I tend to avoid doing it, but
that's just a personal preference...
> I'm assuming that a part of the file name,
> namely "fileID_A3DF.aspx", can easily be
> extracted and its four last characters used as an in-parameter, i.e.
> "A3DF" in a
> call to a database.
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.io.path.getfilenamewithoutextension.aspx
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.string.substring.aspx
--
Mark Rae
ASP.NET MVP
http://www.markrae.net
"Mark Rae [MVP]" <ma...@markNOSPAMrae.net> wrote in message
news:OC5IPtJ...@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
-- Peter
To be a success, arm yourself with the tools you need and learn how to use
them.
Site: http://www.eggheadcafe.com
http://petesbloggerama.blogspot.com
http://ittyurl.net
Thanks for the help. I'd like to get a clarification on a part of
it, though. Which of the following two approaches would be
more suitable, would you say?
1. To distract the key for DB from the file name.
http://localhost/fileID_A3DF.aspx
or
2. To get the key as an explicit argument.
http://localhost/fileID.aspx?key=A3DF
Please advise.
Here you would need to implement an URL rewriting technique
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=asp.net+URL+rewrite
>
> 2. To get the key as an explicit argument.
> http://localhost/fileID.aspx?key=A3DF
>
This will work by default.
In that case, this'll be the method i'll
use. Why complicate thing? Thanks!