Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion I hate IIS - "Server Application Unavailable" error message
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Kevin Liebowicz  
View profile  
 More options Jul 3 2007, 9:50 am
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
From: Kevin Liebowicz <linux-...@lycos.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 06:50:36 -0700
Local: Tues, Jul 3 2007 9:50 am
Subject: Re: I hate IIS - "Server Application Unavailable" error message
On Jul 2, 10:38 pm, "Cowboy \(Gregory A. Beamer\)"

<NoSpamMgbwo...@comcast.netNoSpamM> wrote:
> Juan has given you the hangman's noose. Now I am going to inform you why
> Juan told you not to do this.

> You can get it running on a domain controller by altering this account. The
> problem is you now leave a big hole into your domain controller.

> Why is this a problem? Well, once someone has control of your domain
> controller, they have control of your domain.

> And, why is that dangerous? Do you hold ANY secrets. You know, things like
> customer's credit cards, you own employee's social security numbers?
> Anything like that? Well, you have the potential of leaving it all open for
> someone.

Not at all. This domain controller is in the basement of my house
where it sits behind a firewall. There is no external access to the
network and the domain controller simply provides me with centralized
management for my computers and those that my kids use. I run a web
server on the same machine to serve mp3s, photos and videos.

> Can this really happen? Well, the likelihood is fairly low. It is almost
> impossible on a NORMAL web server, but it is a bit more of a risk on web
> server that happens to sit on a DC.

Not a problem for me unless my wife plans on hacking into the server.
Don't think that you and/or Microsoft understand every customer
scenario because you don't.

> Can you mitigate this. Certainly. Buy a web server.

I don't need yet another machine. The one I currently have is more
than capable.

> Here is the bottom line. Is it less risky to tell the person forcing you to
> do this to buy a web server or to have your customer's data stolen (and
> perhaps your own) or to risk you job telling your boss

There is no customer data. I don't need another computer. And there is
no boss.

>  he needs to spend a
> few thousand on a web server? If the later, then find a better job. And, if
> it is you that is the boss deciding you need to risk your whole business
> over a couple of thosand dollars, then I am wating my time.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. Once again... one size does NOT fit all.

> Don't put your web server on a DC ... EVER.

EVER? Then do explain why my family intranet needs a 2nd machine to
server web pages.

> Nuff said. If you ignore this, you can take Juan's "fix" and hang yourself.

Ignored because you believe that you understand my situation better
than I do. You do not.
> --
> Gregory A. Beamer
> MVP; MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBAhttp://gregorybeamer.spaces.live.com
> Co-author: Microsoft Expression Web Bible (upcoming)

> ************************************************
> Think outside the box!
> ************************************************"Kevin Liebowicz" <linux-...@lycos.com> wrote in message

> news:1183424160.094676.21830@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> Yes, I wasted the past two days trying to fix this.
> Yes, this is on a Win2003 Server.
> Yes, this machine is a domain controller.

> Yes, I seen the dozens of KB articles like this one:http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q315158

> But the problem is that 99% of these are for ASP .NET 1.x and this
> is .NET 2.x which I just installed to try and get .net working for the
> first time ever. I've see all the HACKS to get .net 1.x working... but
> this is for .net 2.x so these worthless KB articles do nothing for me.

> Example -http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q315158

> RESOLUTION
> To work around this problem, use one of the following methods: ·
> Create a weak account that has the correct permissions, and then
> configure the <processModel> section of the Machine.config file to use
> that account.
> · Set the userName attribute to SYSTEM in the <processModel> section
> of the Machine.config file.
> · Configure the <processModel> section of the Machine.config file to
> use an administrator account.

> THIS IS USELESS !!!!!   There is no "userName" attribute in the
> Machine.config file in .net 2.x.  And if this is a known problem then
> why doesn't the installer warn me or fix it automatically. Sorry, but
> your software sucks lately.!!!!!!!

> The event log is filled with messages like:

> <quote>
> aspnet_wp.exe could not be started. The error code for the failure is
> 800700CB. This error can be caused when the worker process account has
> insufficient rights to read the .NET Framework files. Please ensure
> that the .NET Framework is correctly installed and that the ACLs on
> the installation directory allow access to the configured account.
> </quote>

> Sorry Microsoft - But you are getting WORSE and WORSE. How about
> software that simply works????

> It's no wonder that Linux is kicking your butt and I'm about 30
> seconds away from saying goodbye to your over-complicated bug ridden
> crap and making the transition to linux myself.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.