How would/should you do this with biztalk?
Receive data from system1 and in an orchestration , query the second system,
with that response map original message and response to schema of system 3?
Until now we've always routed/mapped data from system 1 to system 2.
In some cases the decision to send the data also needs info from the 2
systems which makes it even more complicated...I don't see how I could do
that...
This would mean...don't route a message based upon data in a second system....
Thank you for your opinion.
Isabelle
Kind Regards,
-Dan
it' not that much data but what I don't really like is the fact that I
receive data from system 1 and have to ask a second system "can i send this"
before I can forward to a third system.... and you don't really know when the
second system will finally say "yes"...so you either have to keep querying
(frequency once/twice a day) or you have to set status on system back to
"send again"
Me I like to receive a message in biztalk , perhaps add some data , but it
has to leave the database as quickly as possible....(otherwise you also have
to keep track if messages aren't staying too long)
I know it's possible using orchestrations and long-running transactions but
it's against my 'biztalk-religion'.... :-)
I'm now looking at using data that system 2 sends to system 3 to also send
to system 1 and store the data there so that the question "can I send" can be
answerred locally before giving the xml to biztalk
(do I make sense here?)
Isabelle
"Dan Rosanova" wrote:
> .
>
Does that make sense? BAM would be a good idea for that too, to
audit.
Kind Regards,
-Dan