Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Could we monitor the errors using the BAM?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Stefan

unread,
Jul 7, 2008, 11:58:44 AM7/7/08
to
I tried to do so but no errors appeared in the BAM.

For instance I created a file send port to a directory that does not
exist.
I monitored in the BAM the Error.Description, Error.FailureCode...etc.
But no error appeared in the BAM.

Any help?

Regards,
Stefan
http://www.itsconsulting.fr

Eric Stott

unread,
Jul 8, 2008, 12:43:46 AM7/8/08
to
What do you mean you 'monitored in the BAM the Error.Description,
Error.FailureCode'?
Eric
http://blog.biztalk-info.com

"Stefan" <ma...@itsconsulting.fr> wrote in message
news:950467ea-a350-4268...@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...

atin

unread,
Jul 8, 2008, 11:45:31 AM7/8/08
to

I guess this should help you
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc546584.aspx

Thanks!
Atin

Eric Stott

unread,
Jul 8, 2008, 4:31:08 PM7/8/08
to
I would test to see when you have an error on the receive side if it works.
Also, did you mark the send side for failed message routing?

Eric
http://stottis.com


"atin" <atin1...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f653d45f-4e47-469c...@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...

Stefan

unread,
Jul 9, 2008, 6:17:41 AM7/9/08
to
Thanks Atin,

Indeed your link is very helpful.

However I still have a question, is the error tracking "application-
specific", that is do I have to define in every BizTalk Application I
have the send port that tracks the errors? Or could I create a global
BizTalk Application for error handling, and this application would
listen to errors that might occur in every single other application?

Regards,
Stefan
http://www.itsconsulting.fr

Stefan

unread,
Jul 9, 2008, 7:35:15 AM7/9/08
to
Thanks Atin,

Indeed your link is very helpful.

However I still have a question, is the tracking "application-


specific", that is do I have to define in every BizTalk Application I
have the send port that tracks the errors?
Or could I create a global BizTalk Application for error handling, and
this application would listen to errors that might occur in every

single application?

Regards,
Stefan
http://www.itsconsulting.fr

atin

unread,
Jul 23, 2008, 1:24:39 PM7/23/08
to

Yes. It should work. Application are just logical containers for
artifacts and bindings and they play no role on how the subscription
works. For ex, you can subscribe to a recive port contained in a
different application from a send port in other application.

Thanks!
Atin

jantrulli

unread,
Nov 15, 2009, 5:00:14 AM11/15/09
to
Hi Stefan, I had a similar issue and I decided to use a 3rd party monitoring tool called Minotaur. It will monitor biztalk for errors and notify you instantaneously.
Check it out: http://www.ragingbulltech.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=46:minotaur&catid=34&Itemid=53
Jan

Stefan wrote:

Could we monitor the errors using the BAM?
09-Jul-08

Any help?

Regards,
Stefan
http://www.itsconsulting.fr

Previous Posts In This Thread:

On Tuesday, July 08, 2008 12:43 AM
Eric Stott wrote:

What do you mean you 'monitored in the BAM the Error.Description, Error.
What do you mean you 'monitored in the BAM the Error.Description,


Error.FailureCode'?
Eric
http://blog.biztalk-info.com

On Tuesday, July 08, 2008 4:31 PM
Eric Stott wrote:

Eric
http://stottis.com

Thanks!
Atin

On Wednesday, July 09, 2008 4:22 AM
Stefan wrote:

Could we monitor the errors using the BAM?

Any help?

Regards,
Stefan
http://www.itsconsulting.fr

On Wednesday, July 09, 2008 4:22 AM
atin wrote:

Re: Could we monitor the errors using the BAM?


I guess this should help you
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc546584.aspx

Thanks!
Atin

On Sunday, July 13, 2008 5:02 PM
Stefan wrote:

Thanks Atin,Indeed your link is very helpful.
Thanks Atin,

Indeed your link is very helpful.

However I still have a question, is the error tracking "application-


specific", that is do I have to define in every BizTalk Application I
have the send port that tracks the errors? Or could I create a global
BizTalk Application for error handling, and this application would

listen to errors that might occur in every single other application?

Regards,
Stefan
http://www.itsconsulting.fr

On Sunday, July 13, 2008 5:02 PM
Stefan wrote:

Thanks Atin,Indeed your link is very helpful.
Thanks Atin,

Indeed your link is very helpful.
However I still have a question, is the tracking "application-
specific", that is do I have to define in every BizTalk Application I
have the send port that tracks the errors?
Or could I create a global BizTalk Application for error handling, and
this application would listen to errors that might occur in every
single application?

Regards,
Stefan
http://www.itsconsulting.fr

On Thursday, July 24, 2008 10:58 PM
atin wrote:

Re: Could we monitor the errors using the BAM?


On Jul 9, 4:35=A0pm, Stefan <ma...@itsconsulting.fr> wrote:

Yes. It should work. Application are just logical containers for
artifacts and bindings and they play no role on how the subscription
works. For ex, you can subscribe to a recive port contained in a
different application from a send port in other application.

Thanks!
Atin

EggHeadCafe - Software Developer Portal of Choice
Silverlight: Handling Cross-Domain Images and Gifs
http://www.eggheadcafe.com/tutorials/aspnet/c0046ba1-5df5-486a-8145-6b76a40ea43d/silverlight-handling-cro.aspx

Daniel S

unread,
Nov 16, 2009, 11:36:36 AM11/16/09
to
I would strongly recommend using the ESB Toolkit (http://
www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=en&FamilyID=bc86cf1e-ef29-4b19-95f7-388f64555090)
and use the Exception Management stuff it comes with. I use this in
all my BTS projects for unified exception handling of all errors
(ports and orchestrations). There is a sample of doing custom error
handling, which you can customize on a per-application basis.

- Dan

On Nov 15, 2:00 am, Jan Trulli wrote:
> Hi Stefan, I had a similar issue and I decided to use a 3rd party monitoring tool called Minotaur. It will monitor biztalk for errors and notify you instantaneously.

> Check it out:http://www.ragingbulltech.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=artic...


> Jan
>
> Stefan wrote:
>
> Could we monitor the errors using the BAM?
> 09-Jul-08
>
> I tried to do so but no errors appeared in the BAM.
>
> For instance I created a file send port to a directory that does not
> exist.
> I monitored in the BAM the Error.Description, Error.FailureCode...etc.
> But no error appeared in the BAM.
>
> Any help?
>
> Regards,

> Stefanhttp://www.itsconsulting.fr


>
> Previous Posts In This Thread:
>
> On Tuesday, July 08, 2008 12:43 AM
>
> Eric Stott wrote:
>
> What do you mean you 'monitored in the BAM the Error.Description, Error.
> What do you mean you 'monitored in the BAM the Error.Description,
> Error.FailureCode'?

> Erichttp://blog.biztalk-info.com


>
> On Tuesday, July 08, 2008 4:31 PM
>
> Eric Stott wrote:
>
> I would test to see when you have an error on the receive side if it works.
> I would test to see when you have an error on the receive side if it works.
> Also, did you mark the send side for failed message routing?
>
> Erichttp://stottis.com
>

> "atin" <atin110...@gmail.com> wrote in message


>
> news:f653d45f-4e47-469c...@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> On Jul 7, 8:58 pm, Stefan <ma...@itsconsulting.fr> wrote:
>

> I guess this should help youhttp://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc546584.aspx


>
> Thanks!
> Atin
>
> On Wednesday, July 09, 2008 4:22 AM
>
> Stefan wrote:
>
> Could we monitor the errors using the BAM?
> I tried to do so but no errors appeared in the BAM.
>
> For instance I created a file send port to a directory that does not
> exist.
> I monitored in the BAM the Error.Description, Error.FailureCode...etc.
> But no error appeared in the BAM.
>
> Any help?
>
> Regards,

> Stefanhttp://www.itsconsulting.fr


>
> On Wednesday, July 09, 2008 4:22 AM
>
> atin wrote:
>
> Re: Could we monitor the errors using the BAM?

> I guess this should help youhttp://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc546584.aspx


>
> Thanks!
> Atin
>
> On Sunday, July 13, 2008 5:02 PM
>
> Stefan wrote:
>
> Thanks Atin,Indeed your link is very helpful.
> Thanks Atin,
>
> Indeed your link is very helpful.
>
> However I still have a question, is the error tracking "application-
> specific", that is do I have to define in every BizTalk Application I
> have the send port that tracks the errors? Or could I create a global
> BizTalk Application for error handling, and this application would
> listen to errors that might occur in every single other application?
>
> Regards,

> Stefanhttp://www.itsconsulting.fr


>
> On Sunday, July 13, 2008 5:02 PM
>
> Stefan wrote:
>
> Thanks Atin,Indeed your link is very helpful.
> Thanks Atin,
>
> Indeed your link is very helpful.
> However I still have a question, is the tracking "application-
> specific", that is do I have to define in every BizTalk Application I
> have the send port that tracks the errors?
> Or could I create a global BizTalk Application for error handling, and
> this application would listen to errors that might occur in every
> single application?
>
> Regards,

> Stefanhttp://www.itsconsulting.fr


>
> On Thursday, July 24, 2008 10:58 PM
>
> atin wrote:
>
> Re: Could we monitor the errors using the BAM?
> On Jul 9, 4:35=A0pm, Stefan <ma...@itsconsulting.fr> wrote:
>
> Yes. It should work. Application are just logical containers for
> artifacts and bindings and they play no role on how the subscription
> works. For ex, you can subscribe to a recive port contained in a
> different application from a send port in other application.
>
> Thanks!
> Atin
>
> EggHeadCafe - Software Developer Portal of Choice

> Silverlight: Handling Cross-Domain Images and Gifshttp://www.eggheadcafe.com/tutorials/aspnet/c0046ba1-5df5-486a-8145-6...

0 new messages