Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion PF_Ring and Iptables

Received: by 10.68.50.169 with SMTP id d9mr789312pbo.0.1320163375445;
        Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:02:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: metaflows@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.68.19.131 with SMTP id f3ls17153417pbe.5.gmail; Tue, 01 Nov
 2011 09:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.27.132 with SMTP id t4mr775222pbg.3.1320163374917;
        Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.27.132 with SMTP id t4mr775220pbg.3.1320163374906;
        Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <li...@metaflows.com>
Received: from www.metaflows.com (www.metaflows.com. [50.18.59.143])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id r5si1150438pbe.1.2011.11.01.09.02.54;
        Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of li...@metaflows.com designates 50.18.59.143 as permitted sender) client-ip=50.18.59.143;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of li...@metaflows.com designates 50.18.59.143 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=li...@metaflows.com
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (ip98-176-129-172.sd.sd.cox.net [98.176.129.172])
	by www.metaflows.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA347EBED
	for <metaflows@googlegroups.com>; Tue,  1 Nov 2011 12:02:53 -0400 (EDT)
References: <8741547f-349c-4221-9eda-cbeae02eceec@g27g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <8741547f-349c-4221-9eda-cbeae02eceec@g27g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----NHL2131JGII0DVNHJSAEULAV57TVKG"
Subject: Re: [MetaFlows] PF_Ring and Iptables
From: "Li...@metaflows.com" <li...@metaflows.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:02:50 -0700
To: metaflows@googlegroups.com
Message-ID: <c0f1687f-3fa4-4db4-895d-d47370d5a05f@email.android.com>

------NHL2131JGII0DVNHJSAEULAV57TVKG
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Do not need iptables, pfring works just like afpacket but in parallel.
-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

snarbles <david.grotenb...@gmail.com> wrote:

Metaflows,

Very interested in making an inline IPS for my home internet
protection using PF Ring..

My question is what other router/iptables configuration is necessary
if I have the DSL Cat 5 cable running to eth0 on my snort IPS and eth1
goes to internal D-Link wireless router?

Thanks,
David Grotenberg


------NHL2131JGII0DVNHJSAEULAV57TVKG
Content-Type: text/html;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html><head></head><body>Do not need iptables, pfring works just like afpacket but in parallel.<br>
-- <br>
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">snarbles &lt;david.grotenb...@gmail.com&gt; wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap:break-word; font-family: sans-serif">Metaflows,<br /><br />Very interested in making an inline IPS for my home internet<br />protection using PF Ring..<br /><br />My question is what other router/iptables configuration is necessary<br />if I have the DSL Cat 5 cable running to eth0 on my snort IPS and eth1<br />goes to internal D-Link wireless router?<br /><br />Thanks,<br />David Grotenberg<br /></pre></blockquote></div></body></html>
------NHL2131JGII0DVNHJSAEULAV57TVKG--