On 8/29/07, zombie67 <zomb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> No work?
>
>
> >
>
On Aug 30, 1:49 am, "James Wanless" <bear...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll have to see if I want to take it forward.
> I still think it's an incredible piece of kit, but it was starting to
> feel like a job, and an unpaid one at that.
> Also I was beginning to wonder if I was wasting people's time in terms
> of the algorithm.
> I am now conducting some more tests on that to reassure myself.
>
> On 8/29/07, zombie67 <zombi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > No work?
tiggatoo:~/math/wec james$ ./factorize2.gmp4.2.1 -Pp89 -a0
a= 357 factor=537
a= 199539 factor=62020897
tiggatoo:~/math/wec james$ ./factorize2.gmp4.2.1 -Pp107 -a0
a= 429 factor=3
a= 643 factor=643
tiggatoo:~/math/wec james$ ./factorize2.gmp4.2.1 -Pp127 -a0
a= 509 factor=3
tiggatoo:~/math/wec james$ ./factorize2.gmp4.2.1 -Pp521 -a0
a= 2085 factor=3
a= 164637 factor=501203
a= 15643514741 factor=443418473521
tiggatoo:~/math/wec james$ ./factorize2.gmp4.2.1 -Pp607 -a0
a= 2429 factor=3
a= 30351 factor=115331
a= 1947729461 factor=202769117249
a= 5185906000000
tiggatoo:~/math/wec james$ ./factorize2.gmp4.2.1 -Pp1279 -a0
a= 5117 factor=3
a= 28139 factor=706009
a= 383701 factor=3107971
a= 1279001
tiggatoo:~/math/wec james$ ./factorize2.gmp4.2.1 -Pp2203 -a0
a= 8813 factor=3
a= 13219 factor=13219
a= 2742871587 factor=208613913329
a= 50000000000
tiggatoo:~/math/wec james$ ./factorize2.gmp4.2.1 -Pp2281 -a0
a= 9125 factor=3
a= 13687 factor=2185362233
a= 2281001
tiggatoo:~/math/wec james$ ./factorize2.gmp4.2.1 -Pp3217 -a0
a= 12869 factor=3
a= 19303 factor=7489177
a= 800000000
tiggatoo:~/math/wec james$ ./factorize2.gmp4.2.1 -Pp4253 -a0
a= 17013 factor=3
a= 58512775 factor=118071787
a= 2777209001
tiggatoo:~/math/wec james$ ./factorize2.gmp4.2.1 -Pp4423 -a0
a= 17693 factor=3
On Aug 30, 9:49 am, "James Wanless" <bear...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll have to see if I want to take it forward.
> I still think it's an incredible piece of kit, but it was starting to
> feel like a job, and an unpaid one at that.
> Also I was beginning to wonder if I was wasting people's time in terms
> of the algorithm.
> I am now conducting some more tests on that to reassure myself.
>
> On 8/29/07, zombie67 <zombi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > No work?