I was just informed in the reprap channel that SF has fallen largely out of favor w/ the community at large and slic3r is the be-all end-all. I was going to use skienforge since I laready know it and like having all them numbers and settings at my fingertips, but apparently slic3r is faster and better. However the big ole question is, why are people here reporting in on slic3r 0.8.* when it is currently on ver 0.9.1?
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:12 PM, vlad <vatan....@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was just informed in the reprap channel that SF has fallen largely out
> of favor w/ the community at large and slic3r is the be-all end-all. I was
> going to use skienforge since I laready know it and like having all them
> numbers and settings at my fingertips, but apparently slic3r is faster and
> better. However the big ole question is, why are people here reporting in
> on slic3r 0.8.* when it is currently on ver 0.9.1?
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:39 AM, Mike Payson <mikepay...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think only because it has not been out for long. I use 0.9.1 and like it
> a lot.
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:12 PM, vlad <vatan....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I was just informed in the reprap channel that SF has fallen largely out
>> of favor w/ the community at large and slic3r is the be-all end-all. I was
>> going to use skienforge since I laready know it and like having all them
>> numbers and settings at my fingertips, but apparently slic3r is faster and
>> better. However the big ole question is, why are people here reporting in
>> on slic3r 0.8.* when it is currently on ver 0.9.1?
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:39 AM, Mike Payson <mikepay...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think only because it has not been out for long. I use 0.9.1 and like it a lot.
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:12 PM, vlad <vatan....@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was just informed in the reprap channel that SF has fallen largely out of favor w/ the community at large and slic3r is the be-all end-all. I was going to use skienforge since I laready know it and like having all them numbers and settings at my fingertips, but apparently slic3r is faster and better. However the big ole question is, why are people here reporting in on slic3r 0.8.* when it is currently on ver 0.9.1?
> --
> Only problem with 9.0.1 is printing first layer not so nice as previous
> versions.
> Best Regards
> Arnold
> On 30 Aug 2012, at 12:45, "Tim A. King, Jr" <king.t...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 0.9.1 is working great for me as well...
> Tim
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:39 AM, Mike Payson <mikepay...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think only because it has not been out for long. I use 0.9.1 and like
>> it a lot.
>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:12 PM, vlad <vatan....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I was just informed in the reprap channel that SF has fallen largely out
>>> of favor w/ the community at large and slic3r is the be-all end-all. I was
>>> going to use skienforge since I laready know it and like having all them
>>> numbers and settings at my fingertips, but apparently slic3r is faster and
>>> better. However the big ole question is, why are people here reporting in
>>> on slic3r 0.8.* when it is currently on ver 0.9.1?
> I have problems with randomized starts - depends on the thing I'm printing > On Aug 30, 2012 7:29 AM, "Arnold" <arnold...@googlemail.com <javascript:>> > wrote:
>> Only problem with 9.0.1 is printing first layer not so nice as previous >> versions.
>> Best Regards >> Arnold
>> On 30 Aug 2012, at 12:45, "Tim A. King, Jr" <king...@gmail.com<javascript:>> >> wrote:
>> 0.9.1 is working great for me as well...
>> Tim
>> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:39 AM, Mike Payson <mikep...@gmail.com<javascript:> >> > wrote:
>>> I think only because it has not been out for long. I use 0.9.1 and like >>> it a lot.
>>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:12 PM, vlad <vata...@gmail.com <javascript:>>wrote:
>>>> I was just informed in the reprap channel that SF has fallen largely >>>> out of favor w/ the community at large and slic3r is the be-all end-all. I >>>> was going to use skienforge since I laready know it and like having all >>>> them numbers and settings at my fingertips, but apparently slic3r is faster >>>> and better. However the big ole question is, why are people here reporting >>>> in on slic3r 0.8.* when it is currently on ver 0.9.1?
I've tried 0.7.2b, 0.8.4, 0.9.0 and 0.9.1. 0.9.1 far exceed the speed and accuracy of the previous builds. Drag and drop STL's rock! It's my standard now.
On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 11:12:10 PM UTC-5, vlad wrote:
> I was just informed in the reprap channel that SF has fallen largely out > of favor w/ the community at large and slic3r is the be-all end-all. I was > going to use skienforge since I laready know it and like having all them > numbers and settings at my fingertips, but apparently slic3r is faster and > better. However the big ole question is, why are people here reporting in > on slic3r 0.8.* when it is currently on ver 0.9.1?
> I have problems with randomized starts - depends on the thing I'm printing
> On Aug 30, 2012 7:29 AM, "Arnold" <arnold2mob...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Only problem with 9.0.1 is printing first layer not so nice as previous
>> versions.
>> Best Regards
>> Arnold
>> On 30 Aug 2012, at 12:45, "Tim A. King, Jr" <king.t...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 0.9.1 is working great for me as well...
>> Tim
>> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:39 AM, Mike Payson <mikepay...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>> I think only because it has not been out for long. I use 0.9.1 and like
>>> it a lot.
>>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:12 PM, vlad <vatan....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I was just informed in the reprap channel that SF has fallen largely
>>>> out of favor w/ the community at large and slic3r is the be-all end-all. I
>>>> was going to use skienforge since I laready know it and like having all
>>>> them numbers and settings at my fingertips, but apparently slic3r is faster
>>>> and better. However the big ole question is, why are people here reporting
>>>> in on slic3r 0.8.* when it is currently on ver 0.9.1?
> I'd be happy if Sound just stuck a fixed Randomized starts feature, and reversed hole perimeter feature into 0.7.2b
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Ross Shannon <i.m.hephaes...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have problems with randomized starts - depends on the thing I'm printing
> On Aug 30, 2012 7:29 AM, "Arnold" <arnold2mob...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Only problem with 9.0.1 is printing first layer not so nice as previous versions.
> Best Regards
> Arnold
> On 30 Aug 2012, at 12:45, "Tim A. King, Jr" <king.t...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 0.9.1 is working great for me as well...
>> Tim
>> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:39 AM, Mike Payson <mikepay...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think only because it has not been out for long. I use 0.9.1 and like it a lot.
>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:12 PM, vlad <vatan....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I was just informed in the reprap channel that SF has fallen largely out of favor w/ the community at large and slic3r is the be-all end-all. I was going to use skienforge since I laready know it and like having all them numbers and settings at my fingertips, but apparently slic3r is faster and better. However the big ole question is, why are people here reporting in on slic3r 0.8.* when it is currently on ver 0.9.1?
>> --
On Thursday, August 30, 2012 12:12:10 AM UTC-4, vlad wrote:
> I was just informed in the reprap channel that SF has fallen largely out > of favor w/ the community at large and slic3r is the be-all end-all. I was > going to use skienforge since I laready know it and like having all them > numbers and settings at my fingertips, but apparently slic3r is faster and > better. However the big ole question is, why are people here reporting in > on slic3r 0.8.* when it is currently on ver 0.9.1?
