                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of g...@mozilla.org designates 63.245.208.213 as permitted sender) client-ip=63.245.208.213;
Message-ID: <4F97FA3D.1080808@mozilla.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 14:21:01 +0100
From: Gervase Markham <g...@mozilla.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120420 Thunderbird/12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Daniel Hans <daniel.m.h...@gmail.com>
CC: Lennard de Rijk <ljvder...@gmail.com>, 
 Sverre Rabbelier <srabbel...@gmail.com>,
 melange-soc-dev <melange-soc-dev@googlegroups.com>, 
 Carol Smith <car...@google.com>
Subject: Re: GSoC historical data
References: <4F97DDD3.8090502@mozilla.org> <CAGdFq_hnKFfvh2_bfhqAmtjU=9raFWJS6=0FGoV2JsrcbQ8...@mail.gmail.com> <CAK-JFo3mpshM-waqTv0=PQNoA3GDoFwWNpY7Wds00ENF=DL...@mail.gmail.com> <CAJk8660JEJJUbRh2-wVrZi_XqQVmCG-gUrg45ym4gBrTPJ0...@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJk8660JEJJUbRh2-wVrZi_XqQVmCG-gUrg45ym4gBrTPJ0...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 25/04/12 14:05, Daniel Hans wrote:
>             Also, pages like this:
>             http://google-melange.appspot.com/org/home/google/gsoc2009/mozilla
>             say "List of projects accepted into the Mozilla project",
>             when in fact
>             they are lists of projects accepted _and_successful_ in the
>             Mozilla
>             project. Unsuccessful projects are not listed. I think
>             that's a mistake,
>             and all projects should be listed. Do you agree?
> 
>     I believe this was Carol's call back in the day. I hope she can
>     chime in and explain the rationale.
> 
> As far as I remember it was even Leslie's call :-P If it is still not
> supposed to be listed, there should be an issue to dynamically change
> list description. Let's hope Carol will clarify on that :)

Just to be clear: the opinion that it should show all projects is my
opinion; I didn't claim Carol thought it should be otherwise. In case
anyone thought that.

As long as the success or failure of the project is not also listed,
then there should be no issue of embarrassing the students.

Gerv