<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>MedStats Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/medstats</link>
  <description>A discussion group for anyone with an interest in Medical Statistics.</description>
  <language>en-GB</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: {MEDSTATS} Re: sample size for sensitivity/specificity</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/medstats/browse_thread/thread/ba8ef741b891f3fd/60240d8b17209af5?show_docid=60240d8b17209af5</link>
  <description>
  If I understand correctly, Evie will need to be able to have confidence intervals simultaneously for sensitivity and specificity. Googling, I found this (it comes with no guarantees). Beware the wrap-over. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:a0Idf5bGvCkJ:www.kck.usm.my/ppsg/statistical_resources/samplesize_forsensitivity_specificitystudiesLinNaing.xls+sensitivity+specificity+sample+size+formula&amp;cd=6&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/medstats/browse_thread/thread/ba8ef741b891f3fd/60240d8b17209af5?show_docid=60240d8b17209af5</guid>
  <author>
  m861h...@btinternet.com
  (Martin Holt)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:52:02 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: {MEDSTATS} Re: sample size for sensitivity/specificity</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/medstats/browse_thread/thread/ba8ef741b891f3fd/f71594fd6c1c1334?show_docid=f71594fd6c1c1334</link>
  <description>
  I have written a program called CONFINT that calculates the sample size &lt;br&gt; necessary to &lt;br&gt; have a specified probability that the confidence interval length is not &lt;br&gt; longer than some &lt;br&gt; specified size. The program is free and includes Fprtran90 source, Win32 &lt;br&gt; and Mac &lt;br&gt; executables. Download from &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://biostatistics.mdanderson.org/SoftwareDownload&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/medstats/browse_thread/thread/ba8ef741b891f3fd/f71594fd6c1c1334?show_docid=f71594fd6c1c1334</guid>
  <author>
  brown...@gmail.com
  (Barry Brown)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:43:38 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Estimating test retest and inter rater reliability</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/medstats/browse_thread/thread/dee9bbe930492e71/bfab5c95022e1273?show_docid=bfab5c95022e1273</link>
  <description>
  Dear All &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Is it possible to obtain estimates of test retest reliability and &lt;br&gt; inter rater reliability using the following design? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Time 1 Time 2 &lt;br&gt; S1 rated by R1 S1 rated by R1 &lt;br&gt; S2 rated by R1 S2 rated by R2 &lt;br&gt; S3 rated by R2 S3 rated by R2
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/medstats/browse_thread/thread/dee9bbe930492e71/bfab5c95022e1273?show_docid=bfab5c95022e1273</guid>
  <author>
  s.wh...@sgul.ac.uk
  (s.white@sgul.ac.uk)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:44:07 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: {MEDSTATS} Re: sample size for sensitivity/specificity</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/medstats/browse_thread/thread/ba8ef741b891f3fd/a0c267ffcec40f28?show_docid=a0c267ffcec40f28</link>
  <description>
  That&#39;s great, thank you all for your help. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Evie
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/medstats/browse_thread/thread/ba8ef741b891f3fd/a0c267ffcec40f28?show_docid=a0c267ffcec40f28</guid>
  <author>
  sos_st...@yahoo.co.uk
  (Evie)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:12:22 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: {MEDSTATS} Re: sample size for sensitivity/specificity</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/medstats/browse_thread/thread/ba8ef741b891f3fd/e8bf25c7ac552dc1?show_docid=e8bf25c7ac552dc1</link>
  <description>
  Just for your information, if I remember it correctly there is a typo &lt;br&gt; in the graph suggested below in the pdf version. The correct graph can &lt;br&gt; be had at the BMJ website. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;On 16 Nov, 19:27, Pedro Emmanuel Alvarenga Americano do Brasil
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/medstats/browse_thread/thread/ba8ef741b891f3fd/e8bf25c7ac552dc1?show_docid=e8bf25c7ac552dc1</guid>
  <author>
  tfr...@gmail.com
  (Thomas Fröjd)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:34:59 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: {MEDSTATS} Re: Sample size for Repeated Measures</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/medstats/browse_thread/thread/38c74c8d19a31992/ee600278f4fdd183?show_docid=ee600278f4fdd183</link>
  <description>
  G*Power does this ­ and more &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.psycho.uni-duesseldorf.de/aap/projects/gpower/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; diana &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;a &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Professor Diana Kornbrot &lt;br&gt; email:  d.e.kornb...@herts.ac.uk &lt;br&gt; web: &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://web.mac.com/kornbrot/iweb/KornbrotHome.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Work &lt;br&gt; School of Psychology &lt;br&gt; University of Hertfordshire &lt;br&gt; College Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9AB, UK
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/medstats/browse_thread/thread/38c74c8d19a31992/ee600278f4fdd183?show_docid=ee600278f4fdd183</guid>
  <author>
  d.e.kornb...@herts.ac.uk
  (kornbrot)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:54:43 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: {MEDSTATS} Re: Sample size for Repeated Measures</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/medstats/browse_thread/thread/38c74c8d19a31992/54cde6482f62f2e8?show_docid=54cde6482f62f2e8</link>
  <description>
  Thank you for your advice, but I have to analyze data via Repeated Measures &lt;br&gt; ANOVA method, &lt;br&gt; so I have to estimate sample size for this kind of test.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/medstats/browse_thread/thread/38c74c8d19a31992/54cde6482f62f2e8?show_docid=54cde6482f62f2e8</guid>
  <author>
  e.sabagh...@gmail.com
  (ehsan sabaghian)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:50:31 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: {MEDSTATS} Re: Sample size for Repeated Measures</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/medstats/browse_thread/thread/38c74c8d19a31992/19610e88bd8e6b97?show_docid=19610e88bd8e6b97</link>
  <description>
  If I follow, you have one group that will be measured 5 times, and you &lt;br&gt; want to have power to detect a mean change (drop) of at least 2 points &lt;br&gt; from time 1 to time 5, or at least to one of the time points after &lt;br&gt; time 1. Is this right? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;What type of analysis do you intend to do? Repeated measures ANOVA?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/medstats/browse_thread/thread/38c74c8d19a31992/19610e88bd8e6b97?show_docid=19610e88bd8e6b97</guid>
  <author>
  bwea...@lakeheadu.ca
  (Bruce Weaver)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:09:42 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Confidence interval for ratio of independent binomial proportions</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/medstats/browse_thread/thread/80ba208184fa6546/b8545a1311d08ff0?show_docid=b8545a1311d08ff0</link>
  <description>
  John, we agree. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Therefore I gave the introductionary remark about the two worlds of &lt;br&gt; science/mathematics on the one hand and guidelines on the other hand. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;From a former discussion in this forum I know, that you work on an &lt;br&gt; project which is due to HPV related FDA-guideline. But this guidelines
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/medstats/browse_thread/thread/80ba208184fa6546/b8545a1311d08ff0?show_docid=b8545a1311d08ff0</guid>
  <author>
  tho...@gmx.de
  (Thomas Keller)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:55:47 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Confidence interval for ratio of independent binomial proportions</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/medstats/browse_thread/thread/80ba208184fa6546/72c3ae55decb778d?show_docid=72c3ae55decb778d</link>
  <description>
  Free Code for Clopper Pearson CI and requisite sample size &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;We provide two programs relevent to Clopper-Pearson confidence limits. &lt;br&gt; The first (BP1CI) calculates these intervals; the second (CONFINT) &lt;br&gt; calculates the sample size necessary to have a specified probability &lt;br&gt; that the length of the interval is not larger than a particular
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/medstats/browse_thread/thread/80ba208184fa6546/72c3ae55decb778d?show_docid=72c3ae55decb778d</guid>
  <author>
  brown...@gmail.com
  (Barry W Brown)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:47:56 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: {MEDSTATS} Re: Sample size for Repeated Measures</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/medstats/browse_thread/thread/38c74c8d19a31992/901d6fe204e45427?show_docid=901d6fe204e45427</link>
  <description>
  I want to compare 5 mean in one group in a period of time that I said. In a &lt;br&gt; similar study with 3 time, they recorded 3 mean and standard deviation: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Time Mean SD &lt;br&gt; first 21.4 3 &lt;br&gt; 2nd 19.2 4.2 &lt;br&gt; 3rd 19.3 3.9 &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Now I want to do the same study with 5 time. The minimum effect is nearly
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/medstats/browse_thread/thread/38c74c8d19a31992/901d6fe204e45427?show_docid=901d6fe204e45427</guid>
  <author>
  e.sabagh...@gmail.com
  (ehsan sabaghian)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:11:14 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: {MEDSTATS} Re: Sample size for Repeated Measures</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/medstats/browse_thread/thread/38c74c8d19a31992/9600f45657c7976d?show_docid=9600f45657c7976d</link>
  <description>
  OK, good. Now what is the effect you want to have power to detect, &lt;br&gt; and what is the minimum effect size that would be considered &lt;br&gt; practically important? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;-- &lt;br&gt; Bruce Weaver &lt;br&gt; bwea...@lakeheadu.ca &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/Home&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;When all else fails, RTFM.&amp;quot;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/medstats/browse_thread/thread/38c74c8d19a31992/9600f45657c7976d?show_docid=9600f45657c7976d</guid>
  <author>
  bwea...@lakeheadu.ca
  (Bruce Weaver)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:49:14 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: {MEDSTATS} Re: Sample size for Repeated Measures</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/medstats/browse_thread/thread/38c74c8d19a31992/369796d825c7e379?show_docid=369796d825c7e379</link>
  <description>
  Sorry... I posted a answer for another email with similar heading. Please &lt;br&gt; ignore it? &lt;br&gt; Abraço forte e que a força esteja com você, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Dr. Pedro Emmanuel A. A. do Brasil &lt;br&gt; Instituto de Pesquisa Clínica Evandro Chagas &lt;br&gt; Fundação Oswaldo Cruz &lt;br&gt; Rio de Janeiro - Brasil &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;2009/11/16 Pedro Emmanuel Alvarenga Americano do Brasil &amp;lt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/medstats/browse_thread/thread/38c74c8d19a31992/369796d825c7e379?show_docid=369796d825c7e379</guid>
  <author>
  emmanuel.bra...@gmail.com
  (Pedro Emmanuel Alvarenga Americano do Brasil)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:29:50 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: {MEDSTATS} Re: sample size for sensitivity/specificity</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/medstats/browse_thread/thread/ba8ef741b891f3fd/62888095990ad854?show_docid=62888095990ad854</link>
  <description>
  If you would like something very simple and straight I suggest this reading! &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/22/3/180&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;It implments a graph wich no formulars or computers is necessary. Very good &lt;br&gt; for starters. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Abraço forte e que a força esteja com você, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Dr. Pedro Emmanuel A. A. do Brasil
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/medstats/browse_thread/thread/ba8ef741b891f3fd/62888095990ad854?show_docid=62888095990ad854</guid>
  <author>
  emmanuel.bra...@gmail.com
  (Pedro Emmanuel Alvarenga Americano do Brasil)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:27:40 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Confidence interval for ratio of independent binomial proportions</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/medstats/browse_thread/thread/80ba208184fa6546/5724dad394d84588?show_docid=5724dad394d84588</link>
  <description>
  Thomas, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;It&#39;s probably worth mentioning that the Clopper-Pearson intervals are &lt;br&gt; not exact in the modern sense (as in permutation-based methods). &lt;br&gt; George Cassella recommends the latter (permutation) exact approach in &lt;br&gt; his comment to: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Lawrence D. Brown, T. Tony Cai and Anirban DasGupta, Interval
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/medstats/browse_thread/thread/80ba208184fa6546/5724dad394d84588?show_docid=5724dad394d84588</guid>
  <author>
  jsueber...@gmail.com
  (John Uebersax)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:25:12 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
