relocation/rename of the plugin

[David Bernard]

Hi,

Due to end of scala-tools.org (and end of maven 2 support), the next
version 2.16.0 will move from

  groupId : org.scala-tools
  artifactId : maven-scala-plugin

to

  groupId : net.alchim31.maven
  artifactId : scala-maven-plugin (follow maven 3 rules)

You can access a snapshot from
  repository : https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots/

 <groupId>net.alchim31.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>scala-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.16.0-SNAPSHOT</version>

Also, I would :
* rename as "scala-maven-plugin" the git repository (github) to mirror
the change.
* move the license from "Apache Software License 2.0" to UNLICENSE
(see http://unlicense.org/)

WDYT ?

[Josh Suereth]

+1 from me.

[Indrajit Raychaudhuri]

+1

Would it also make sense to bump up the major version number?

- Indrajit

On Tuesday 6 March 2012 at 4:41 AM, Josh Suereth wrote:

> +1 from me.

> On Mar 5, 2012 7:53 AM, "David Bernard" <david.be...@gmail.com (mailto:david.be...@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >

> > Due to end of scala-tools.org (http://scala-tools.org) (and end of maven 2 support), the next

[Martin Grigorov]

+1

[David Bernard]

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 14:26, Bryan Hunt
<bryan...@sentimentmetrics.com> wrote:

> Sounds like a good plan, for a moment I thought you were ceasing
> development. The thought of being stuck with 'SBT' really freaked me
> out!

development is minimal (try to fix bug, and react to environment
changes, issues, merge pull request)
I'll probably remove goal scala:cs in the next version (in this case
the version number will bump).

> Why was the Apache License no good? Did it not have a waranty section or
> something?

I prefer UNLICENSE because i thing it matches more the project/code
life : no copyright, no owner (anyone can fork, release).
The code/project can live out of "our jurisdiction".

>
> Regards,
>
> Bryan Hunt

[Tommy Chheng]

Looks great, any expected date of release onto the release repo(not snapshots)?

[David Bernard]

I just finish the minimum I hopped to include for 3.0.0. I'll do the release today. Announcement on  implicit.ly, other scala's mailing-list later (may be for the 3.0.1, with doc fix,....).

[martin-g]

Hi,

At http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/net/alchim31/maven/scala-maven-plugin/3.0.0/
I can see .pom, -sources.jar and -javadoc.jar, but the .jar itself is
missing.

On Mar 18, 9:54 pm, David Bernard <david.bernard...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I just finish the minimum I hopped to include for 3.0.0. I'll do the
> release today. Announcement on  implicit.ly, other scala's mailing-list
> later (may be for the 3.0.1, with doc fix,....).
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 23:43, Tommy Chheng <tommy.chh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Looks great, any expected date of release onto the release repo(not
> > snapshots)?
>
> > On Monday, March 5, 2012 4:53:37 AM UTC-8, David Bernard wrote:
>
> >> Hi,
>
> >> Due to end of scala-tools.org (and end of maven 2 support), the next
> >> version 2.16.0 will move from
>
> >>   groupId : org.scala-tools
> >>   artifactId : maven-scala-plugin
>
> >> to
>
> >>   groupId : net.alchim31.maven
> >>   artifactId : scala-maven-plugin (follow maven 3 rules)
>
> >> You can access a snapshot from

> >>   repository :https://oss.sonatype.org/**content/repositories/**
> >> snapshots/ <https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots/>
>
> >>  <groupId>net.alchim31.maven</**groupId>
> >>  <artifactId>scala-maven-**plugin</artifactId>
> >>  <version>2.16.0-SNAPSHOT</**version>

[David Bernard]

Damned!! I'll try to fix this for tomorrow.

Thanks.

[David Bernard]

fixed with 3.0.1

Sorry

[Martin Grigorov]

All is working here. Thanks !