MathJax V2.0 - Final Testing

Frédéric WANG

unread,

Feb 21, 2012, 5:14:55 PM2/21/12

to mathj...@googlegroups.com

Dear all,

Below are the final results for MathJax V2.0.

The issues (bugs or new features) tagged
ready-for-review/ready-for-release in the tracker are included in the
test suite or otherwise have been confirmed by some users/developers to
be fixed. The most serious bugs that have been detected by the testing
framework are fixed, notably those for the new SVG output Jax and other
bugs due to "particularities" of Opera and Internet Explorer, as well as
various small issues or regressions. Tests have not been run on each
platform, but it seems that bugs are relatively independent of the
operating system. The only thing I'm little concerned about is that we
didn't run automated tests for IE9 and more specifically not IE9 with
SVG output Jax. But we executed tests for document modes < 9 and SVG
output Jax in other browsers, so that should hopefully be enough for the
moment.

Some work to do for the post-V2.0 period:

* Make the testing framework support more platforms.
* Improve test execution/debugging to become more convenient and faster.
* Rewrite some tests to make them compatible with all platforms and more
robust.
* Add more tests: for new features in the doc, for bug fixes and
features of future versions, for Mathjax contributed extensions etc

I don't plan to work on the MathJax project during the end of the
February, but I wish good luck to the rest of the MathJax team to
finalize the work and certainly release MathJax 2.0 soon!

Fr�d�ric

-----

Chrome:

http://devel.mathjax.org/testing/web/results/v2.0-candidate/2012-02-21/Windows_Chrome_default_STIX_HTML-CSS.html.gz
http://devel.mathjax.org/testing/web/results/v2.0-candidate/2012-02-21/Windows_Chrome_default_TeX_HTML-CSS.html.gz
http://devel.mathjax.org/testing/web/results/v2.0-candidate/2012-02-21/Windows_Chrome_default_TeX_SVG.html.gz

Firefox:

http://devel.mathjax.org/testing/web/results/v2.0-candidate/2012-02-21/Linux_Firefox_default_STIX_HTML-CSS.html.gz
http://devel.mathjax.org/testing/web/results/v2.0-candidate/2012-02-21/Linux_Firefox_default_TeX_HTML-CSS.html.gz
http://devel.mathjax.org/testing/web/results/v2.0-candidate/2012-02-21/Linux_Firefox_default_TeX_SVG.html.gz

Internet Explorer:

http://devel.mathjax.org/testing/web/results/v2.0-candidate/2012-02-21/Windows_MSIE_Quirks_STIX_HTML-CSS.html.gz
http://devel.mathjax.org/testing/web/results/v2.0-candidate/2012-02-21/Windows_MSIE_IE7_STIX_HTML-CSS.html.gz
http://devel.mathjax.org/testing/web/results/v2.0-candidate/2012-02-21/Windows_MSIE_IE8_STIX_HTML-CSS.html.gz

Opera:

http://devel.mathjax.org/testing/web/results/v2.0-candidate/2012-02-21/Linux_Opera_default_TeX_HTML-CSS.html.gz
http://devel.mathjax.org/testing/web/results/v2.0-candidate/2012-02-21/Linux_Opera_default_TeX_HTML-SVG.html.gz

--
Fr�d�ric Wang
maths-informatique-jeux.com/blog/frederic

Davide P. Cervone

unread,

Feb 22, 2012, 8:31:15 AM2/22/12

to mathj...@googlegroups.com

Thanks for these. The results look good.

I did notice one thing: in

Configuration/Contexts/basic-ref.html

you have added "width:100" rather than "width:100%", which is causing
several test failures.

Davide

> Frédéric

> Frédéric Wang
> maths-informatique-jeux.com/blog/frederic
>
>

Davide P. Cervone

unread,

Feb 22, 2012, 9:02:22 AM2/22/12

to mathj...@googlegroups.com

Fred:

When you list IE7 and IE8, are these actual IE7 and IE8 or IE9 in IE7
or IE8 emulation modes? If actual IE7 and IE8, what document mode is
it (Quirks)?

Davide

On Feb 21, 2012, at 5:14 PM, Frédéric WANG wrote:

> Frédéric

> Frédéric Wang
> maths-informatique-jeux.com/blog/frederic
>
>

Frédéric WANG

unread,

Feb 22, 2012, 11:09:46 AM2/22/12

to mathj...@googlegroups.com

On 22/02/2012 14:31, Davide P. Cervone wrote:
> Thanks for these. The results look good.
>
> I did notice one thing: in
>
> Configuration/Contexts/basic-ref.html
>
> you have added "width:100" rather than "width:100%", which is causing
> several test failures.
>
> Davide

Yes, I noticed these failures too, but I was pretty sure it was my fault
:-) I'll fix that.

> Fred:
>
> When you list IE7 and IE8, are these actual IE7 and IE8 or IE9 in IE7
> or IE8 emulation modes? If actual IE7 and IE8, what document mode is
> it (Quirks)?
>
> Davide

It's IE9 with emulation modes Quirks, IE7, IE8.

Davide P. Cervone

unread,

Feb 22, 2012, 11:22:56 AM2/22/12

to mathj...@googlegroups.com

>> Thanks for these. The results look good.
>>
>> I did notice one thing: in
>>
>> Configuration/Contexts/basic-ref.html
>>
>> you have added "width:100" rather than "width:100%", which is
>> causing several test failures.
>>
>> Davide
>
> Yes, I noticed these failures too, but I was pretty sure it was my
> fault :-) I'll fix that.

No problem. Easy to do.

>> When you list IE7 and IE8, are these actual IE7 and IE8 or IE9 in
>> IE7 or IE8 emulation modes? If actual IE7 and IE8, what document
>> mode is it (Quirks)?
>>
>> Davide
>
> It's IE9 with emulation modes Quirks, IE7, IE8.

OK, thanks!

And thanks for doing all the testing. It has certainly made a
difference for the v2.0 release. I feel much more confident now that
we have gone through several weeks of testing.

Davide

Reply all

Reply to author

Forward