Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Exercise 29(c) of Section 6.5, what is the 3 x 3 matrix?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  8 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Bernard A. Doria  
View profile  
 More options Apr 23 2005, 7:40 am
From: "Bernard A. Doria" <thoughtcap...@zworg.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 04:40:17 -0700
Local: Sat, Apr 23 2005 7:40 am
Subject: Exercise 29(c) of Section 6.5, what is the 3 x 3 matrix?
In Exercise 29(c) of Section 6.5, we are to use the 3 x 3 matrix whose
columns are the vectors w_1, w_2, w_3, respectively, in Example 4 of
Section 6.2. This example is located in page 345, and the vectors are

w_1 = (1, 0, 1, 0),
w_2 = (1, 1, 1, 1), and
w_3 = (0, 1, 2, 1).

How are we supposed to construct the 3 x 3 matrix out of these vectors?


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
mariotanev@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Apr 25 2005, 2:00 am
From: "mariota...@gmail.com" <mariota...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 23:00:43 -0700
Local: Mon, Apr 25 2005 2:00 am
Subject: Re: Exercise 29(c) of Section 6.5, what is the 3 x 3 matrix?
The 3x3 matrix is A = ( w_1 w_2 w_3 ) where w_i are columns of A. So,
based on what you know from part b) construct Q and R using the
information about A.

Bernard A. Doria wrote:
> In Exercise 29(c) of Section 6.5, we are to use the 3 x 3 matrix
whose
> columns are the vectors w_1, w_2, w_3, respectively, in Example 4 of
> Section 6.2. This example is located in page 345, and the vectors are

> w_1 = (1, 0, 1, 0),
> w_2 = (1, 1, 1, 1), and
> w_3 = (0, 1, 2, 1).

> How are we supposed to construct the 3 x 3 matrix out of these

vectors?

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Kenneth A. Ribet  
View profile  
 More options Apr 25 2005, 6:11 pm
From: "Kenneth A. Ribet" <kri...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 15:11:45 -0700
Local: Mon, Apr 25 2005 6:11 pm
Subject: Re: Exercise 29(c) of Section 6.5, what is the 3 x 3 matrix?
I killed part c of this problem and also part e, which depends on c.

Also, in problem 7 of this section, it seems to me that the field F has
to be C (rather than R).

-ken r


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Eunice Cheng  
View profile  
 More options Apr 26 2005, 1:24 am
From: "Eunice Cheng" <eunicech...@berkeley.edu>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 22:24:02 -0700
Local: Tues, Apr 26 2005 1:24 am
Subject: Re: Exercise 29(c) of Section 6.5, what is the 3 x 3 matrix?
In 6.5.29a, what's (1)? Example 1 of 6.2? Thanks!
Eunice.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "adjoints and inverses" by Christopher Reeder
Christopher Reeder  
View profile  
 More options Apr 26 2005, 2:40 am
From: Christopher Reeder <kamb...@berkeley.edu>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 23:40:02 -0700
Local: Tues, Apr 26 2005 2:40 am
Subject: adjoints and inverses
I know we talked about this in OH today. But, why is it again that the
adjoint of the inverse equals the inverse of the adjoint?

thanks, Chris


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Exercise 29(c) of Section 6.5, what is the 3 x 3 matrix?" by Bernard A. Doria
Bernard A. Doria  
View profile  
 More options Apr 26 2005, 2:44 am
From: "Bernard A. Doria" <thoughtcap...@zworg.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 23:44:55 -0700
Local: Tues, Apr 26 2005 2:44 am
Subject: Re: Exercise 29(c) of Section 6.5, what is the 3 x 3 matrix?

Eunice Cheng wrote:
> In 6.5.29a, what's (1)? Example 1 of 6.2? Thanks!
> Eunice.

On p. 344, see the equation displayed under Theorem 6.4.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "adjoints and inverses" by Bernard A. Doria
Bernard A. Doria  
View profile  
 More options Apr 26 2005, 2:59 am
From: "Bernard A. Doria" <thoughtcap...@zworg.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 23:59:53 -0700
Local: Tues, Apr 26 2005 2:59 am
Subject: Re: adjoints and inverses

Christopher Reeder wrote:
> I know we talked about this in OH today. But, why is it again that
> the adjoint of the inverse equals the inverse of the adjoint?

> thanks, Chris

Let V be a finite-dimensional inner product space, and let T be a
linear operator on V. Suppose T is invertible. Then we have (T)(T^-1) =
(T^-1)(T) = I. Taking the adjoint of each expression in this equation,
we apply Theorem 6.11 (p. 360) to obtain [(T^-1)^*][T^*] =
[T^*][(T^-1)^*] = I. But this means that there exists a function that
is the inverse of T^*, namely, (T^*)^-1 = (T^-1)^*.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Christopher Reeder  
View profile  
 More options Apr 26 2005, 3:17 am
From: Christopher Reeder <kamb...@berkeley.edu>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 00:17:58 -0700
Local: Tues, Apr 26 2005 3:17 am
Subject: Re: adjoints and inverses
ah yes. thank you.

On Apr 25, 2005, at 11:59 PM, Bernard A. Doria wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google