MarpaX::Languages

[Durand Jean-Damien]

Paul,
Still ok for this namespace ? I would like to take MarpaX::Language::C::AST. This is the best place for Marpa promotion IMHO + I do not see another way to elegantly put a test suite that c2ast must have.
Thanks / JD.

[Paul Bennett]

I was going to go ahead and just use MarpaX::SGML for my latest
shenanigans, since it's not a "language parser" in the typical sense.
Likewise, the "gloria" project is probably going in the App::Gloria
namespace, since it's an app and not (specifically) a Marpa
implementation of a language.

As far as I'm concerned, any other namespace is clear for launch. I
don't know how I feel about ::Language::XYZ::AST in comparison to
::Language::AST::XYZ, but that's largely a matter of artistic
sentiment ;-)


--
Paul

[Jeffrey Kegler]

Actually, why not MarpaX::C::AST or MarpaX::C2AST? -- jeffrey

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "marpa parser" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to marpa-parser...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>

[Durand Jean-Damien]

Jeffrey,

I have the vision of other areas but pure grammars, for example MarpaX::Plugin::SomeApplication - Between C2AST and C::AST I'm less confident - the later sound cleaner, just a feeling.

Regards, Jean-Damien.