Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
marpa parser
Home
+ new post
About this group
Join this group
Message from discussion Symbol name can be any Perl string literal?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
rns  
View profile  
 More options Nov 3 2012, 3:55 pm
From: rns <sor...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 12:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Nov 3 2012 3:55 pm
Subject: Symbol name can be any Perl string literal?
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

Just thought that subj could become like a killer feature of Marpa as with use
utf8; (UTF-8 source encoding) it allows using mathematical (or any other,
for that matter) notation in a textual grammar and that grammar, being
properly parsed and evaluated, would be transformed into perl (
Lingua::Romana::*Perligata*<http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~damian/papers/HTML/Perligata.html> on
steroids).

Perl6 has malleable syntax with its regexes, but (as of yet) has no Marpa
to ensure that everything you can write in BNF is parseable.

Weird as it is, just a thought.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google