Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
MarcoPolo analogue for Windows users?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  7 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Mike Renfro  
View profile  
 More options Jul 25 2008, 11:01 pm
From: Mike Renfro <mwren...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:01:14 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Jul 25 2008 11:01 pm
Subject: MarcoPolo analogue for Windows users?
Is there anything comparable to MarcoPolo for those of us stuck with
the other operating system? In case there's not, I've started working
on some Python code to do the evidence sources (have working sources
for IP addresses, attached monitors, active network links, running
applications, and time of day), but I'm more than happy to just use
someone else's program.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
David Symonds  
View profile  
 More options Jul 26 2008, 12:32 am
From: "David Symonds" <dsymo...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 14:32:24 +1000
Local: Sat, Jul 26 2008 12:32 am
Subject: Re: [marcopolo-discuss] MarcoPolo analogue for Windows users?

On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Mike Renfro <mwren...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there anything comparable to MarcoPolo for those of us stuck with
> the other operating system? In case there's not, I've started working
> on some Python code to do the evidence sources (have working sources
> for IP addresses, attached monitors, active network links, running
> applications, and time of day), but I'm more than happy to just use
> someone else's program.

I believe there was an effort to write something like that, initially
targeted at Gnome/Linux, called GeoClue
(http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/GeoClue). It might be good
to contribute your effort there, or at least see what they've got
going on.

Dave.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mike Renfro  
View profile  
 More options Jul 26 2008, 1:01 am
From: Mike Renfro <mwren...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Jul 26 2008 1:01 am
Subject: Re: MarcoPolo analogue for Windows users?
Looks like GeoClue is just focused on providing physical location to
other applications. So I'm continuing on with my poor imitation of
MarcoPolo. Proof-of-concept Python code is posted at [1].

[1] http://blogs.cae.tntech.edu/mwr/2008/07/25/wheres-marcopolo-for-windows/


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
David Symonds  
View profile  
 More options Jul 26 2008, 2:53 am
From: "David Symonds" <dsymo...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 16:53:30 +1000
Local: Sat, Jul 26 2008 2:53 am
Subject: Re: [marcopolo-discuss] Re: MarcoPolo analogue for Windows users?

On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Mike Renfro <mwren...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looks like GeoClue is just focused on providing physical location to
> other applications. So I'm continuing on with my poor imitation of
> MarcoPolo. Proof-of-concept Python code is posted at [1].

> [1] http://blogs.cae.tntech.edu/mwr/2008/07/25/wheres-marcopolo-for-windows/

Cool, thanks for sharing that.

Your confidence combination system is different to MarcoPolo's,
incidentally. Instead of summing the confidences, MarcoPolo multiplies
their complement (1-confidence) and then takes the complement of the
product. In your Python code, it would amount to changing lines to
look like:

contexts[ruleContext] *= 1 - ruleStrength
  ...
for context in contexts:
  print context, 1 - contexts[ruleContext]

Dave.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Chris Karr  
View profile  
 More options Jul 26 2008, 9:50 am
From: Chris Karr <cjk...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 08:50:37 -0500
Local: Sat, Jul 26 2008 9:50 am
Subject: Re: [marcopolo-discuss] MarcoPolo analogue for Windows users?
Forgive me if I'm intruding here with some of my own work, but over  
the past several months, I've been working on a system similar to  
MarcoPolo called Pennyworth:

        http://pennyworth.aetherial.net

It's an open-source application that currently runs on the Mac and  
uses machine learners to learn and predict changes in user activity,  
location, and social context.

I bring this up because it fills a very similar role to MarcoPolo and  
this week, I began working on the Windows port of the Pennyworth  
system. I have a couple of sensors (evidence sources) running on the  
Windows .Net framework and I am aiming to have a complete beta by the  
end of August.

If you're interested in this Windows port and would like to be kept up  
to date on its development, please e-mail me off-list.

-Chris

On Jul 25, 2008, at 10:01 PM, Mike Renfro wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
David Symonds  
View profile  
 More options Jul 26 2008, 10:36 am
From: "David Symonds" <dsymo...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:36:04 +1000
Local: Sat, Jul 26 2008 10:36 am
Subject: Re: [marcopolo-discuss] Re: MarcoPolo analogue for Windows users?

On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 11:50 PM, Chris Karr <cjk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Forgive me if I'm intruding here with some of my own work, but over
> the past several months, I've been working on a system similar to
> MarcoPolo called Pennyworth:

By all means, go for it. As should be obvious from the fact that
MarcoPolo is free (as in speech) software, I'm interested in better
software overall, not just my own project! I'm always happy for folk
to discuss other related projects, especially their own.

Dave.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mike Renfro  
View profile  
 More options Jul 26 2008, 1:15 pm
From: Mike Renfro <mwren...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 10:15:47 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Jul 26 2008 1:15 pm
Subject: Re: MarcoPolo analogue for Windows users?
On Jul 26, 1:53 am, "David Symonds" <dsymo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Your confidence combination system is different to MarcoPolo's,
> incidentally. Instead of summing the confidences, MarcoPolo multiplies
> their complement (1-confidence) and then takes the complement of the
> product. In your Python code, it would amount to changing lines to
> look like:

> contexts[ruleContext] *= 1 - ruleStrength
>   ...
> for context in contexts:
>   print context, 1 - contexts[ruleContext]

New and improved version is up with these changes, and others (CIDR
addressing for IP addresses, time of day rules, miscellaneous code
cleanup).

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google