Hi Elliot,
I’m not sure that I would describe it as continuous as if you zoom in I’m sure these are all individual points, they just happen to overlap at the zoom level you have set the map window to. The only apparent difference I can see between the two is the symbol style. One symbol style “fake” has a circle with a black outline; the other has no black outline. Changing the style to match that used in the “real” dataset should get you the result you want.
One thing to bear in mind however; the colour shown along the route of points is only that of the topmost point. It has no bearing on what the values are underneath it and so could be misleading. Zooming in to a point where the individual points are visible without obscuring one another will provide the true picture of the range of values in a given area.
Hope this helps,
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "MapInfo-L" group.To post a message to this group, send
email to mapi...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, go to:
http://groups.google.com/group/mapinfo-l/subscribe?hl=en
For more options, information and links to MapInfo resources (searching
archives, feature requests, to visit our Wiki, visit the Welcome page at
http://groups.google.com/group/mapinfo-l?hl=en
Hi Elliot,
Try changing your Symbol clauses as below:
-110:-95 Symbol(35,16711680,10,"Map Symbols",0,0),
-95:-85 Symbol(35,16776960,10,"Map Symbols",0,0),
-85:-75 Symbol(35,255,10,"Map Symbols",0,0),
-75:-65 Symbol(35,32768,10,"Map Symbols",0,0),
-65:0 Symbol(35,65280,10,"Map Symbols",0,0)
Hopefully that should get the results you’re looking for.
HTH,
the quickest way to fix this is to layer propities
then use map symbols the do not have a border