Look at the feature
http://www.google.com/mapmaker?ll=28.633288,77.302449&spn=0.002604,0.004957&t=k&z=18&iwloc=7_0&gw=55&editids=sDWdy-Y727UEajUMvL&dtab=history
, which is currently up for moderation. However, it's not clear what
exactly the edit being moderated is, and it doesn't make sense to put
up such a thing for moderation. Edits are (at least) of 3 types:
Adding a new feature
Modifying an existing feature
Deleting a feature
It *must* always be clear to the moderator which of the 3 types the
edit falls in. In the modify case, it *must* be clear to the moderator
what the old state and new state of the feature is. This is the least
a moderator can expect to know before he/she moderates.
However, in this example, the situation is not clear. The moderate tab
says:
Route:
Interesting notes about this edit:
User is new to making edits of this kind
A mature feature has been modified
And my comments:
Route: [it's not a "route", it's a local park!]
Interesting notes about this edit:
User is new to making edits of this kind [which kind?]
A mature feature has been modified [aha, so this edit is of the
"modify" type. But surely I should be told this independent of the
mature-feature comment! Anyway, I should take this with a pinch of
salt: if Map Maker can say "Added road is too short or too long" in
case of a modify or a delete, who knows, it might be lying here too.]
The history tab has similar stuff:
We might be missing some of the older changes
Changed 13 hours 37 mins ago by phobia
Route:
# Interesting notes about this edit: User is new to making edits of
this kind
# A mature feature has been modified
This feature has undergone total 3 changes
This doesn't tell me what the old state of the feature was. Confusing
the moderators this way may lead to more misunderstandings between the
editors and moderators.