Message from discussion
title tag lentgh
Received: by 10.66.73.170 with SMTP id m10mr796758pav.29.1348216414244;
Fri, 21 Sep 2012 01:33:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: manchester-wordpress-user-group@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.68.222.39 with SMTP id qj7ls11286167pbc.2.gmail; Fri, 21 Sep
2012 01:33:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.90.102 with SMTP id bv6mr769502pab.34.1348216413617;
Fri, 21 Sep 2012 01:33:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.90.102 with SMTP id bv6mr769501pab.34.1348216413604;
Fri, 21 Sep 2012 01:33:33 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <m...@zed1.com>
Received: from sender1.zohomail.com (sender1.zohomail.com. [72.5.230.100])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id vw9si1991386pbc.2.2012.09.21.01.33.33;
Fri, 21 Sep 2012 01:33:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of m...@zed1.com designates 72.5.230.100 as permitted sender) client-ip=72.5.230.100;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of m...@zed1.com designates 72.5.230.100 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=m...@zed1.com
Received: from mail-vc0-f181.google.com (mail-vc0-f181.google.com [209.85.220.181]) by mx.zohomail.com
with SMTPS id 1348216412695745.3979649624537; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 01:33:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vchn11 with SMTP id n11so4202659vch.12
for <manchester-wordpress-user-group@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 01:33:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.204.197 with SMTP id fn5mr2525192vcb.71.1348216411477;
Fri, 21 Sep 2012 01:33:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.27.15 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 01:33:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c124da53-351a-41cc-a271-3b49d127d765@googlegroups.com>
References: <2E52CB6145804C3AB3A053BAC44E8F52@UTSETSLP> <c124da53-351a-41cc-a271-3b49d127d765@googlegroups.com>
From: Mike Little <m...@zed1.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 09:33:00 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMb54M34E3nsgLsgacXJZp2UU3ezZmCMpRQ_Yq5Lnxk1oXDJxw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [MWUG] Re: title tag lentgh
To: manchester-wordpress-user-group@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54fb4f249575a04ca3218c8
X-ZohoMailClient: External
X-Zoho-Virus-Status: 2
--bcaec54fb4f249575a04ca3218c8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On 21 September 2012 09:14, Phil Gregory <phil.greg...@zero1.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi Angel, yes it's important. 69 characters is the optimum.
>
> Why bother using PHP to amend the titles?
>
> There are plenty of useful meta tag plugins that can help you achieve the
> optimum search engine placement.
>
> A handy one that springs to mind is the All in one SEO pack.
>
> http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/all-in-one-seo-pack/
>
>
>
I would recommend Joost de Walk's WordPress SEO plugin (
http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wordpress-seo/) over All in One SEO.
All in One SEO tends to automate too many things to the detriment of your
SEO! It seems to still work on the principal that it is sites that rank in
SERPs when it is pages that do so.
WordPress SEO gives you many tuning parameters with immediate feedback,
along with some sensible defaults and a host of other related features like
XML sitemaps and proper canonical links.
Mike
--
Mike Little
http://zed1.com/
--bcaec54fb4f249575a04ca3218c8
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 21 September 2012 09:14, Phil Gregory <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"m=
ailto:phil.greg...@zero1.co.uk" target=3D"_blank">phil.greg...@zero1.co.uk<=
/a>></span> wrote:<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gm=
ail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-le=
ft:1ex">
Hi Angel, yes it's important. 69 characters is the optimum.<div><br></d=
iv><div>Why bother using PHP to=C2=A0amend=C2=A0the titles?=C2=A0</div><div=
><br></div><div>There are plenty of useful meta tag plugins that can help y=
ou achieve the optimum search engine placement.</div>
<div><br></div><div>A handy one that springs to mind is the All in one SEO =
pack.</div><div><br></div><div><a href=3D"http://wordpress.org/extend/plugi=
ns/all-in-one-seo-pack/" target=3D"_blank">http://wordpress.org/extend/plug=
ins/all-in-one-seo-pack/</a><br>
</div><div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><div><br></div><div><br></div=
></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I would recommend Joost de Wa=
lk's WordPress SEO plugin (<a href=3D"http://wordpress.org/extend/plugi=
ns/wordpress-seo/">http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wordpress-seo/</a>) =
over All in One SEO. All in One SEO tends to automate too many things to th=
e detriment of your SEO! It seems to still work on the principal that it is=
sites that rank in SERPs when it is pages that do so.</div>
<div><br></div><div>WordPress SEO gives you many tuning parameters with imm=
ediate feedback, along with some sensible defaults and a host of other rela=
ted features like XML sitemaps and proper canonical links.</div><div><br>
</div><div>Mike</div></div>-- <br>Mike Little<br><a href=3D"http://zed1.com=
/" target=3D"_blank">http://zed1.com/</a><br><br>
--bcaec54fb4f249575a04ca3218c8--