Maybe into a Cupcake/Thingomatic group and a Replicator group? I don't
know the ease, etc. of doing this or if anyone else thinks this would
be helpful. The questions about them seem very different. It might
make specific info easier to find. Just a thought.
I'm a Cupcake user who has basically stopped reading this list. I receive it, and when I have a Cupcake-related question I grep all the email trying to find an answer.
On 6/12/12 19:36, mathisyourfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Maybe into a Cupcake/Thingomatic group and a Replicator group? I don't
> know the ease, etc. of doing this or if anyone else thinks this would
> be helpful. The questions about them seem very different. It might
> make specific info easier to find. Just a thought.
My vote is NO. The TOM/Cupcake discussions offer fantastic background info for me and my Replicator. I believe most topics seem to be universal, and the platform specific topics still often touch on topics that may be a concern or cover fundamentals that help improve the use of my Replicator.
What MAY be helpful is to prefix the subject with the platform in question when a specific platform issue comes up. i.e. subject of "TOM - Wrong Y axis", or "Replicator - dual printing". If enough of us do that, then the info is still available to all, but self organzing.
If a TOM specific list were started, I would not sign up for it as I don't have a TOM. But I would miss out on a lot of knowledge too.
In short, I believe that splitting the list delays the learning curve of newer users. But I'm just one person.
My thoughts.
Shawn
On 12-06-12 05:36 PM, mathisyourfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Maybe into a Cupcake/Thingomatic group and a Replicator group? I don't
> know the ease, etc. of doing this or if anyone else thinks this would
> be helpful. The questions about them seem very different. It might
> make specific info easier to find. Just a thought.
You've expressed exactly how I feel too. Coming into this as a brand new
user I've really appreciated all the perspective gained by reading the
discussions about all the machines, not just the one I happen to be using.
Maybe someday a split will be needed, but not yet by any means. Your
subject suggestion should help people filter as needed.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Shawn <sgro...@open2space.com> wrote:
> My vote is NO. The TOM/Cupcake discussions offer fantastic background
> info for me and my Replicator. I believe most topics seem to be universal,
> and the platform specific topics still often touch on topics that may be a
> concern or cover fundamentals that help improve the use of my Replicator.
> What MAY be helpful is to prefix the subject with the platform in question
> when a specific platform issue comes up. i.e. subject of "TOM - Wrong Y
> axis", or "Replicator - dual printing". If enough of us do that, then the
> info is still available to all, but self organzing.
> If a TOM specific list were started, I would not sign up for it as I don't
> have a TOM. But I would miss out on a lot of knowledge too.
> In short, I believe that splitting the list delays the learning curve of
> newer users. But I'm just one person.
> My thoughts.
> Shawn
> On 12-06-12 05:36 PM, mathisyourfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> Maybe into a Cupcake/Thingomatic group and a Replicator group? I don't
>> know the ease, etc. of doing this or if anyone else thinks this would
>> be helpful. The questions about them seem very different. It might
>> make specific info easier to find. Just a thought.
>> Joe
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "MakerBot Operators" group.
> To post to this group, send email to makerbot@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to makerbot+unsubscribe@**
> googlegroups.com <makerbot%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** > group/makerbot?hl=en <http://groups.google.com/group/makerbot?hl=en>.
The Cupcake and ThingOMatic stock hardware design will eventually fade away. The strong standard now seems to be the Replicator and Ultimaker gantry design. If anything, the Gen3 and Gen4 electronics will be converted over for use in a DIY Replicator or Ultimaker type machine. I know I'm doing it after having my own Ultimaker. Also, Jetty has made accelerated firmware for both Gen3 and Gen4. That alone is incentive for people to keep their working Gen3 and Gen4 electronics and just apply it to an upgraded box. Also, Jetty has created his own separate Google User Group on Jetty firmware. That is the other unifying force among all these different electronics.
________________________________ From: Shawn <sgro...@open2space.com> To: makerbot@googlegroups.com Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:28 PM Subject: Re: [MakerBot] Would it be useful to split up this group by product now?
My vote is NO. The TOM/Cupcake discussions offer fantastic background info for me and my Replicator. I believe most topics seem to be universal, and the platform specific topics still often touch on topics that may be a concern or cover fundamentals that help improve the use of my Replicator.
What MAY be helpful is to prefix the subject with the platform in question when a specific platform issue comes up. i.e. subject of "TOM - Wrong Y axis", or "Replicator - dual printing". If enough of us do that, then the info is still available to all, but self organzing.
If a TOM specific list were started, I would not sign up for it as I don't have a TOM. But I would miss out on a lot of knowledge too.
In short, I believe that splitting the list delays the learning curve of newer users. But I'm just one person.
My thoughts.
Shawn
On 12-06-12 05:36 PM, mathisyourfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Maybe into a Cupcake/Thingomatic group and a Replicator group? I don't > know the ease, etc. of doing this or if anyone else thinks this would > be helpful. The questions about them seem very different. It might > make specific info easier to find. Just a thought.
> Joe
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MakerBot Operators" group. To post to this group, send email to makerbot@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to makerbot+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/makerbot?hl=en.
I fixed a problem with a Printrbot last night because of learning
about X/Y problems with the TOM here on this forum, and I own a
Replicator which I used to print a new X axis pulley with for the PB.
It's all good.
I'm curious to know how you like the PrintRBot? I saw it on KickStarter - and it looked pretty cool. But, are you having to tinker a lot with it? And, the problem with the PrintRBot - was it a problem from the start - or were you using it for a while then you ran into the problem? I also liked the PrintRBot because of the price. Although, I myself am still working with my CupCake.
> I fixed a problem with a Printrbot last night because of learning
> about X/Y problems with the TOM here on this forum, and I own a
> Replicator which I used to print a new X axis pulley with for the PB.
> It's all good.
As someone who started with Makerbot in the beginning (batch #1) I have seen a lot of info go by on this list. While a lot of it doesn't pertain to me, info that i didn't think i needed became useful. That happened are too many times to count. Addin stepper extruders and upgrading RepG are just two areas that were made easier by keeping up with the list.
I would vote for keeping it all I the same group, but better subject lines would be very helpful.
Just my two cents,
Thanks to everyone that has given me advice!
O.
Sent from my mobile
(Please excuse my brevity and typos)
On Jun 13, 2012, at 2:04 AM, Adan Akerman <a...@akerworks.com> wrote:
> You've expressed exactly how I feel too. Coming into this as a brand new user I've really appreciated all the perspective gained by reading the discussions about all the machines, not just the one I happen to be using.
> Maybe someday a split will be needed, but not yet by any means. Your subject suggestion should help people filter as needed.
> Adan
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Shawn <sgro...@open2space.com> wrote:
> My vote is NO. The TOM/Cupcake discussions offer fantastic background info for me and my Replicator. I believe most topics seem to be universal, and the platform specific topics still often touch on topics that may be a concern or cover fundamentals that help improve the use of my Replicator.
> What MAY be helpful is to prefix the subject with the platform in question when a specific platform issue comes up. i.e. subject of "TOM - Wrong Y axis", or "Replicator - dual printing". If enough of us do that, then the info is still available to all, but self organzing.
> If a TOM specific list were started, I would not sign up for it as I don't have a TOM. But I would miss out on a lot of knowledge too.
> In short, I believe that splitting the list delays the learning curve of newer users. But I'm just one person.
> My thoughts.
> Shawn
> On 12-06-12 05:36 PM, mathisyourfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Maybe into a Cupcake/Thingomatic group and a Replicator group? I don't
> know the ease, etc. of doing this or if anyone else thinks this would
> be helpful. The questions about them seem very different. It might
> make specific info easier to find. Just a thought.
> Joe
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MakerBot Operators" group.
> To post to this group, send email to makerbot@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to makerbot+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/makerbot?hl=en.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MakerBot Operators" group.
> To post to this group, send email to makerbot@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to makerbot+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/makerbot?hl=en.
> As someone who started with Makerbot in the beginning (batch #1) I have
> seen a lot of info go by on this list. While a lot of it doesn't pertain
> to me, info that i didn't think i needed became useful. That happened
> are too many times to count. Addin stepper extruders and upgrading RepG
> are just two areas that were made easier by keeping up with the list.
> I would vote for keeping it all I the same group, but better subject
> lines would be very helpful.
Yes it's useful to learn from other people's experiences, and to keep up with developments.
I don't think there's enough traffic yet to need to split things up, wait
till we get to the point where I wake up and have to sort through a hundred
messages.
Jumping on the me-too bandwagon - I think splitting the groups would mean
the same mistakes and discoveries will be made all over again in each
group. No bueno.
> Nao presta in portuguese. the group has spoken and the split (and
> possible ensuing civil unrest/war) has been averted.
> Joe
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MakerBot Operators" group.
> To post to this group, send email to makerbot@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to makerbot+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/makerbot?hl=en.
But we can all make little army men to simulate it! (just finished printing a space marine a few minutes ago, so kinda ironic to see talk of civil war.. lol)
> On Jun 14, 2012, at 2:21 PM, mathisyourfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> Nao presta in portuguese. the group has spoken and the split (and
>> possible ensuing civil unrest/war) has been averted.
>> Joe
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MakerBot Operators" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to makerbot@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to makerbot+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/makerbot?hl=en.
I've also thought about personalized chess pieces/game pieces. my
nephew wants to be the king with monkeys for pawns.
Shawn: Was it master chief that you made?
On Jun 14, 2:53 pm, Shawn <sgro...@open2space.com> wrote:
> But we can all make little army men to simulate it! (just finished
> printing a space marine a few minutes ago, so kinda ironic to see talk
> of civil war.. lol)
> On 12-06-14 12:44 PM, Owen M Collins wrote:
> > Man, civil war would have sucked.
> > ;)
> > O.
> > On Jun 14, 2012, at 2:21 PM, mathisyourfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >> Nao presta in portuguese. the group has spoken and the split (and
> >> possible ensuing civil unrest/war) has been averted.
> >> Joe
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MakerBot Operators" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to makerbot@googlegroups.com.
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to makerbot+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> >> For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/makerbot?hl=en.
There are lots of questions that 'cross pollinate' information that
would just be duplicated and possibly posted to several lists
concurrently.
In short, I think it would add more overhead that it would cure.
The Spacemarine_Fixed.stl model. First run was with external support only. Failed, but not too badly. Second print was with internal/external support. It came out much better but the extra crud to be removed/cut off detracts from the surface finish.
Watch the thing and I'll be posting an "I made one" to it in a short bit tonight.
