------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snm...@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
The sysUpTime value in a notification is the time that the SNMP
agent has been running. This will not be coordinated between
separate systems. (This value may also be affected by tweaks
to the system clock).
So no - this timestamp is not going to be useful in ordering events.
You haven't said anything about the payload of these traps.
If they include timestamp varbinds provided by the PTP module,
then it's quite possible that the values will be more accurate.
But the standard SNMP trap information won't really help you here.
Dave
No doubt I could create a PTP-based trap but I was thinking of things
like cold start and link up. Sounds like I don't gain anything in
trap analysis by having highly-coordinated clocks. Thanks.
> No doubt I could create a PTP-based trap but I was thinking of things
> like cold start and link up. Sounds like I don't gain anything in
> trap analysis by having highly-coordinated clocks. Thanks.
Hmmm... if you can find an object for the system clock time, then you could perform gets on sysUpTime and sysClockTime in the same packet. A little jitter interpolation and you could quickly get very close to the coordinated time value of received traps.
HTH,
Mike