Message from discussion
Any best practices for stacking filters?
Received: by 10.66.84.34 with SMTP id v2mr28756pay.38.1350949213030;
Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:40:13 -0700 (PDT)
Path: s9ni33693pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news.glorb.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!ctu-peer!news.nctu.edu.tw!csnews.cs.nctu.edu.tw!news.cs.nctu.edu.tw!FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw!postfix.org!owner-postfix-users
From: wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema)
Newsgroups: mailing.postfix.users
Subject: Re: Any best practices for stacking filters?
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 19:39:58 -0400 (EDT)
Organization: NCTU CS FreeBSD Server
Lines: 19
Sender: n...@FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw
Message-ID: <mailpost.1350949212.4757550.1063.mailing.postfix.users@FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw>
References: <B8421732CF3AD6C35B2E1420@[192.168.1.43]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw 1350949212 64243 127.0.0.1 (22 Oct 2012 23:40:12 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 23:40:12 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> --On Monday, October 22, 2012 4:23 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
> <qua...@zimbra.com> wrote:
>
>
> >> There is, and there will not be, a queue between the Postfix SMTP
> >> server protocol engine and the Postfix Milter client protocol engine,
> >> where email messages wait until a broken Milter server comes back.
>
> By the way, as long as Amavis isn't involved, I can get Postfix to queue
> mail if the milter is down just fine, by setting things up as a content
> filter that fronts the milter.
There is, however, no milter_default_action ON THE SMTP SERVER SIDE
that accepts mail and keeps it queued until the milter comes back.
That's what you objected to, and that's what will never exist.
Wietse