Message from discussion
PAM modules
Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.netfront.net!ctu-peer!news.nctu.edu.tw!csnews.cs.nctu.edu.tw!news.cs.nctu.edu.tw!FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw!freebsd.org!owner-freebsd-security
From: d...@des.no (=?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?=)
Newsgroups: mailing.freebsd.security
Subject: PAM modules
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:05:39 +0200
Organization: NCTU CS FreeBSD Server
Lines: 13
Sender: n...@FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw
Message-ID: <mailpost.1316186502.9543835.32263.mailing.freebsd.security@FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw 1316186502 22384 ::1 (16 Sep 2011 15:21:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:21:42 +0000 (UTC)
We currently have a number of PAM modules in ports, and while some of
them are specific to certain third-party software, many aren't. I
believe we would benefit from importing at least some of these into
base. My question is: which ones?
DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - d...@des.no
_______________________________________________
freebsd-secur...@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"