I have just installed FreeBSD 8.2 RELEASE amd64 onto my new Lenovo ThinkCentre and i'm dual-booting FreeBSD with Windows & which was preinstalled.
When the system boots i see the message shown below in dmesg which relates to the partitions on the FreeBSD slice. So far i have not experienced any problems with using the system and it does boot into the OS ok. but i don't know if there's a problem here that i need to fix or if it's a warning i can ignore because i don't know what it means. i am hoping someone can help me and explain what it is.
Here is the text:
GEOM: ad8: partition 4 does not start on a track boundary.
GEOM: ad8: partition 4 does not end on a track boundary.
GEOM: ad8: partition 3 does not start on a track boundary.
GEOM: ad8: partition 3 does not end on a track boundary.
GEOM: ad8: partition 2 does not start on a track boundary.
GEOM: ad8: partition 2 does not end on a track boundary.
GEOM: ad8: partition 1 does not start on a track boundary.
GEOM: ad8: partition 1 does not end on a track boundary.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-...@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org"
jamie
Yeaah.. create it initally. .cn with windows software then fbsd bootloader. .jp the error is closely related to fbsd with out complicating things..
Jamie Paul Griffin <ja...@gnix.co.uk> wrote:
i'm sorry but that doesn't make any sense at all. could you explain a solution more clearly please?
The message indicates that there is a discrepancy between
reported values (BIOS vs. disk) about the disk geometry.
> Here is the text:
>
> GEOM: ad8: partition 4 does not start on a track boundary.
> GEOM: ad8: partition 4 does not end on a track boundary.
> GEOM: ad8: partition 3 does not start on a track boundary.
> GEOM: ad8: partition 3 does not end on a track boundary.
> GEOM: ad8: partition 2 does not start on a track boundary.
> GEOM: ad8: partition 2 does not end on a track boundary.
> GEOM: ad8: partition 1 does not start on a track boundary.
> GEOM: ad8: partition 1 does not end on a track boundary.
Using some google, there are the following things you could
read:
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=9105
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=9524
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2009-March/004830.html
http://koitsu.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/testing-out-freebsd-8-0-rc1/
There are explainations and solutions. I hope it will help.
But as I said, I'm quite sure you can ignore the messages
as they do not affect the system.
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
I am speaking from experience when i say it's related to freebsd..
If you attempt this on your own, start looking through google starting with the keyphrase "freebsd partition". I don't see any shame in that..
Jamie Paul Griffin <j.gr...@msn.com> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 12:41:17PM -0400, Michael J. Kearney wrote:
> I'm texting .it ... try the windows software. .ru I'm sick of myself ... .fr
>
> Yeaah.. create it initally. .cn with windows software then fbsd bootloader. .jp the error is closely related to fbsd with out complicating things..
i'm sorry but that doesn't make any sense at all. could you explain a solution more clearly please?
jamie
I had a disk two years ago that caused FBSD to spew the same nonsense.
I downloaded FreeDOS <http://www.freedos.org/>, created a CD then
proceeded to removed all of the partition information from the disk. I
then recreated the partition format I wanted, rebooted and formatted
the drive. Now, when I installed FBSD there were no error messages. I
don't know if that will help you or not.
--
Jerry ✌
FreeBS...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__________________________________________________________________
Give me enough medals, and I'll win any war.
Napoleon
thanks to you both. it seems it's nothing to worry about so i'm happy to just ignore the warnings, i was just worried it might cause problems in some way later on.
jamie
> i'm sorry but that doesn't make any sense at all. could you explain a
> solution more clearly please?
There's no problem. Maybe MS-DOS or Windows 95 would have problems with such a
layout, but modern operating systems don't.
--
Bruce Cran
i am sure you're right but i simply didn't understand what he was trying to say and i really only wanted to understand what the warnings meant.
jamie
Jamie Paul Griffin <ja...@gnix.co.uk> wrote:
> I really don't think i have much control over what other people think
> lol .cn
>
> Jamie Paul Griffin <ja...@gnix.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 07:24:29PM +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
>> On Wednesday 06 Apr 2011 17:58:21 Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
>>
>> > i'm sorry but that doesn't make any sense at all. could you explain a
>> > solution more clearly please?
>>
>> There's no problem. Maybe MS-DOS or Windows 95 would have problems with
>> such a
>> layout, but modern operating systems don't.
>
> i am sure you're right but i simply didn't understand what he was trying
> to say and i really only wanted to understand what the warnings meant.
Which is exactly what he's trying to avoid (you understanding what he's
saying). He's spamming you for some reason, with vague-sounding stuff
interspersed with country abbreviations like jp (Japan), cn (Canada) - in
other words, nonsense.
Back on topic, you can and should ignore the warnings. They won't cause
any problems, which certainly can't be said about you fiddling with your
partitions.
Jud
--
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance any day." -
Douglas Adams
> Back on topic, you can and should ignore the warnings. They won't cause
> any problems, which certainly can't be said about you fiddling with your
> partitions.
> Jud
thank you for your clear advice Jud.
best wishes
jamie