Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

"Operation not permitted" on 9.0-BETA1 firewall (PF) about 1 hour after boot-up

125 views
Skip to first unread message

Matthew X. Economou

unread,
Aug 25, 2011, 2:10:30 PM8/25/11
to
I recently upgraded a firewall from a March-ish 9-CURRENT to 9.0-BETA1 (csup run August 21 around 12:00 AM EDT). Since then, after approximately an hour after it boots, the firewall stops passing any traffic (IPv4 and IPv6). OpenVPN, for example, logs the following errors:

write UDPv4: Operation not permitted (code=1)

Quagga, for another example, logs something similar:

ripd[1696]: can't send packet : Operation not permitted0
ospfd[1702]: *** sendmsg in ospf_write failed to 172.30.0.3, id 0, off 0, len 76, interface tap0 mtu 1500: Operation not permitted

If I try to ping something from the console, I get the same error message:

# ping 4.2.2.2
ping: sendto: Operation not permitted

I've tried both my current (unmodified and working prior to the upgrade) and experimental PF configurations, neither of which have any effect on the problem. Reloading the PF configuration (/etc/rc.d/pf reload) or restarting PF altogether (/etc/rc.d/pf restart) also have no effect. Only if I shut down PF completely (/etc/rc.d/pf stop) do I regain network connectivity - I can do things like ping hosts (IPv4 and IPv6), browse the web, and pass traffic that's just routed through the firewall (i.e., not requiring NAT). As a workaround, I'm rebooting the firewall automatically every hour.

The kernel I'm currently running has debugging disabled for performance testing purposes, so I am building a proper debug kernel now. In the meantime, has anyone encountered similar problems with PF? What additional troubleshooting can I try? I looked through the various information available in pfctl, but to be perfectly honest, I don't know what I'm looking for. I didn't think to check overall memory utilization, like what netstat -m would show you, so the next time this happens I'll try to collect that data.

Best wishes,
Matthew

Matthew X. Economou

unread,
Aug 26, 2011, 9:23:47 AM8/26/11
to
It appears that PF isn't removing any entries from the state table. Note that the state table size is at its default of 10000 (which correlates to the amount of memory installed on the firewall - 256 MB).

State Table Total Rate
current entries 10013
searches 554801 13.4/s
inserts 10013 0.2/s
removals 0 0.0/s

When I booted the debug kernel last night, it panicked in pfsync_send_plus as soon as init enabled PF (backtrace included below).

Starting pflog.
pflog0: promiscuous mode enabled
Aug 25 20:54:21 pflogd[1611]: [priv]: msg PRIV_OPEN_LOG received
Enabling pfpanic: mutex pf task mtx owned at /usr/src/sys/contrib/pf/net/if_pfsync.c:3163
cpuid = 0
KDB: enter: panic
[ thread pid 1619 tid 100053 ]
Stopped at kdb_enter+0x3a: movl $0,kdb_why
db> bt
Tracing pid 1619 tid 100053 td 0xc23da2e0
kdb_enter(c09777c9,c09777c9,c0975d7b,c6fd79e0,0,...) at kdb_enter+0x3a
panic(c0975d7b,c0946080,c0944e87,c5b,c6fd7a0c,...) at panic+0x134
_mtx_assert(c0a1b388,0,c0944e87,c5b,c6fd7a24,...) at _mtx_assert+0x127
pfsync_send_plus(c6fd7a24,18,10,ad6,1000000,...) at pfsync_send_plus+0xf2
pfsync_clear_states(a218d664,c236fb78,c0945f1c,635,c09ae167,...) at pfsync_clear_states+0x8d
pfioctl(c22a0800,c0cc4412,c236fb00,3,c23da2e0,...) at pfioctl+0x1b90
devfs_ioctl_f(c23ce578,c0cc4412,c236fb00,c216ce80,c23da2e0,...) at devfs_ioctl_f+0x10b
kern_ioctl(c23da2e0,3,c0cc4412,c236fb00,1fd7cec,...) at kern_ioctl+0x21d
ioctl(c23da2e0,c6fd7cec,c6fd7d28,c097d93a,0,...) at ioctl+0x134
syscallenter(c23da2e0,c6fd7ce4,c6fd7ce4,0,0,...) at syscallenter+0x263
syscall(c6fd7d28) at syscall+0x34
Xint0x80_syscall() at Xint0x80_syscall+0x21
--- syscall (54, FreeBSD ELF32, ioctl), eip = 0x281e6263, esp = 0xbfbfe8ac, ebp = 0xbfbfe998 ---
db>

I just re-ran csup (sorry, not sure how to find the specific revision ID) and noticed that pf.c was updated, so I'm going to make world and see if that fixes anything.

Best wishes,
Matthew

bwdutton

unread,
Oct 1, 2011, 12:45:35 AM10/1/11
to
On Aug 26, 6:23 am, "Matthew X. Economou" <xenophon+use...@irtnog.org>
wrote:
Did you find any resolution to this issue? I just upgraded from 8-
STABLE to 9-BETA3 and my home server/firewall is doing the same thing.

Thanks,
Brad
0 new messages