I have wave and am fine with moving there..
.. of the top of my head, I think the quickest way to simplify the
download/install story would be to ship binaries of milestone
releases.. github supports downloads.
As far as Guidelines.. maybe a best practices/style guide? But it'd be
easy to just turn that into a prescriptive guidance on how to do
context/spec testing, which may or may be what we want. I recall your
comments about people using intention-revealing names for their
Becauses, instead of just "of". Is a README the place to put that
guidance out, or should that Guidelines section just provide links to
posts on the topic? or both? Maybe a non-authoritative "this is how
the framers of MSpec intended it to be used" sort of thing? This could
also be hashed out by users in a wiki in a "recipe" sort of format...
As far as github sites goes: it's pretty cool. I use it for my blog,
but.. what would it offer that couldn't be covered in the README? even
if you look at the github site for Sinatra, you can see that it is
mostly re-displaying info already in the README..
Cheers
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "machine_users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
machin...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/machine_users?hl=.
>
>
>