Hi and thanks Dave,
Thanks for the information on View Loaders.
"I" am not a fan of convention-based coding...
I like to see what it is happening without ambiguity / having to work it out.
Mind you in this case it is a really easy "get" - so perhaps that's nothing worry about!
As for your statement that they're not 1 for 1...
I actually started writing a rebuttal - of how they are 1 for 1.
every page-view has a hard and fast link to view-page.
The fact that you can use page-view multiple times - doesn't make it not 1 for 1.
But then it finally dawned on me....
The benefit comes with refactoring.
In that you can alter the view-page, in one place - and all the view-page declarations (regardless of how many) get the new file and or path.
And with that thinking in mind, the view-loader makes really good sense to me, too....
Damn you Mach-II.... stop making so much sense!