Message from discussion
{LVL1} Recommendations for broadband ISP
Hackerspace" <lvl1@googlegroups.com>
Received: by 10.236.175.196 with SMTP id z44mr10933256yhl.6.1333380033102;
Mon, 02 Apr 2012 08:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lvl1@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.236.114.50 with SMTP id b38ls7611566yhh.1.gmail; Mon, 02 Apr
2012 08:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.76.4 with SMTP id a4mr10994739yhe.2.1333380032670;
Mon, 02 Apr 2012 08:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.76.4 with SMTP id a4mr10994736yhe.2.1333380032650;
Mon, 02 Apr 2012 08:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <dougl...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-gy0-f178.google.com (mail-gy0-f178.google.com [209.85.160.178])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t62si11630502yhj.2.2012.04.02.08.20.32
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Mon, 02 Apr 2012 08:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of dougl...@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.178 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.178;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of dougl...@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.178 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=dougl...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-gy0-f178.google.com with SMTP id f1so1230226ghb.9
for <lvl1@googlegroups.com>; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 08:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=M3KtZIJR01vI4jgCtIrvEhv9VYYsC8X9Dm9fwIMsTxU=;
b=TBRkypfbCQItK7L9C+2FwSDvJ+Z8YnUEgAxAWiCkv6kFuVcaSZSTH4f6wCYv8JFtwy
tVzgNLyPSJFzalEYdGv0kyJ0FtQB4z/YbazauxlWba58NF3bQWJ0ksQwfc+0IoTFKi2/
7hhSd/g7eJrRk6LYRg7POnnfcoj5k3biYngBO9fUsSzs5rB3JulHdtWa7Vp1x6iJIdgc
M5QvZmiP/UifAlWpRbBV/DzB9TfxlfZsW6yHrzuBJZ1ovru6lsDnCBu0NSE+HCan0OUF
vHwkQok6owq2MhSt29zhxcYX6+nxwm4YVw7pXUZWJXQMKYLJn19J9kEfdZjHhO/dZJT9
/iew==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.37.236 with SMTP id b12mr5918302igk.36.1333380032415; Mon,
02 Apr 2012 08:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.207.71 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 08:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKOTTRYq=vbMQjpgTdbNo0PF-1+O1kk_933CpYEPTVXL_Rv...@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKOTTRaXdBBg9K-Jnn12=Rx3Fe6wnF_rSN3Hhc6ZOS8Z4Gd...@mail.gmail.com>
<CAD-Wv_kQFGpZi5gJctBL3RUhVuXvc4DCenw_u6XFDF5GFSm...@mail.gmail.com>
<CAKOTTRYq=vbMQjpgTdbNo0PF-1+O1kk_933CpYEPTVXL_Rv...@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 11:20:32 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+_2z5P70CceJmvhuYOKa4UZF2zpL=Gscp=eRrcHZYPoeoR...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: {LVL1} Recommendations for broadband ISP
From: "DE 'Tad' Heckaman III" <dougl...@gmail.com>
To: lvl1@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044788d92ec93c04bcb3bbb6
--f46d044788d92ec93c04bcb3bbb6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I'm not exactly sure where the 'Highlands' is located... Is Google
accurate? http://goo.gl/NBwep
You could check Bluegrass.net and see if you are in their coverage area:
http://www.bluegrass.net/wireless-internet
They also offer DSL, probably with the same capabilities as Iglou.
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Christopher Cprek <paxtita...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Yeah Iglou was the first thing to come to mind. Too bad about needing the
> AT&T.
>
> Any other contenders?
>
> Thanks Ben!
>
> Chris
>
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Ben Hibben <the.blens...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I really like Iglou, though I have to pay for a phone line I don't
> otherwise
> > use (it's not even hooked to a phone) because headless DSL isn't
> allowed in
> > the city unless you choose AT&T. Stupid monopolies. But on the positive
> > side they're local, friendly, and give you a dedicated IP and don't care
> > what you run on your end (servers, services, etc.). I've been with them
> for
> > many years now.
> >
> > Blenster
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Christopher Cprek <paxtita...@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Challenge: Not Insight (soon to be Time Warner) or AT&T
> >>
> >> Looks like I'm going to be moving soonish and I'm curious what options
> >> are out there and what folks would recommend. I don't have or want
> >> cable TV or satellite. I don't have or want a landline connection
> >> either really.
> >>
> >> I'm assuming any independent ISPs would be DSL, but I'm not sure if
> >> 'dry' DSL is still an option. I worked for a Telco in the early 2000s
> >> that provided dry DSL to customers in Eastern KY, but I'm not sure if
> >> this was a PSC anomaly.
> >>
> >> I'm going to be in southern area of the Highlands, if it's a
> >> consideration for wireless ranges.
> >>
> >> Recommendations?
> >>
> >> Chris
> >
> >
>
--
Tad Heckaman
--f46d044788d92ec93c04bcb3bbb6
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm not exactly sure where the 'Highlands' is located... Is Goo=
gle accurate?=A0<a href=3D"http://goo.gl/NBwep">http://goo.gl/NBwep</a><div=
><div>You could check Bluegrass.net and see if you are in their coverage ar=
ea:</div>
<div><a href=3D"http://www.bluegrass.net/wireless-internet">http://www.blue=
grass.net/wireless-internet</a>=A0</div><div><br></div><div>They also offer=
DSL, probably with the same=A0capabilities=A0as Iglou.=A0</div><div><br></=
div><div>
<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Christo=
pher Cprek <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:paxtita...@gmail.com">pa=
xtita...@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quot=
e" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Yeah Iglou was the first thing to come to mind. Too bad about needing the A=
T&T.<br>
<br>
Any other contenders?<br>
<br>
Thanks Ben!<br>
<br>
Chris<br>
<div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><br>
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Ben Hibben <<a href=3D"mailto:the.blens=
t...@gmail.com">the.blens...@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> I really like Iglou, though I have to pay for a phone line I don't=
otherwise<br>
> use (it's not even hooked to a=A0 phone) because headless DSL isn&=
#39;t allowed in<br>
> the city unless you choose AT&T.=A0 Stupid monopolies.=A0 But on t=
he positive<br>
> side they're local, friendly, and give you a dedicated IP and don&=
#39;t care<br>
> what you run on your end (servers, services, etc.).=A0 I've been w=
ith them for<br>
> many years now.<br>
><br>
> Blenster<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Christopher Cprek <<a href=3D"mail=
to:paxtita...@gmail.com">paxtita...@gmail.com</a>><br>
> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Challenge: Not Insight (soon to be Time Warner) or AT&T<br>
>><br>
>> Looks like I'm going to be moving soonish and I'm curious =
what options<br>
>> are out there and what folks would recommend. I don't have or =
want<br>
>> cable TV or satellite. I don't have or want a landline connect=
ion<br>
>> either really.<br>
>><br>
>> I'm assuming any independent ISPs would be DSL, but I'm no=
t sure if<br>
>> 'dry' DSL is still an option. I worked for a Telco in the =
early 2000s<br>
>> that provided dry DSL to customers in Eastern KY, but I'm not =
sure if<br>
>> this was a PSC anomaly.<br>
>><br>
>> I'm going to be in southern area of the Highlands, if it's=
a<br>
>> consideration for wireless ranges.<br>
>><br>
>> Recommendations?<br>
>><br>
>> Chris<br>
><br>
><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><div><br></div>-- <br>=
Tad Heckaman<br>
</div></div>
--f46d044788d92ec93c04bcb3bbb6--