Hackerspace" <lvl1@googlegroups.com>
Received: by 10.236.178.3 with SMTP id e3mr10290212yhm.3.1339185409892;
        Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:56:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lvl1@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.236.155.199 with SMTP id j47ls1583954yhk.7.gmail; Fri, 08 Jun
 2012 12:56:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.101.16.19 with SMTP id t19mr3121254ani.4.1339185409192;
        Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:56:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.101.16.19 with SMTP id t19mr3121252ani.4.1339185409171;
        Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:56:49 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <paxtita...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-gg0-f182.google.com (mail-gg0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a57si4742387yhh.5.2012.06.08.12.56.49
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:56:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of paxtita...@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.182 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.182;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of paxtita...@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.182 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=paxtita...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-gg0-f182.google.com with SMTP id m2so2430731ggn.27
        for <lvl1@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:56:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=pP5seNVyinPpO498vVFw9Wk2QMy9QDsVSRLI24/wrIs=;
        b=NjUJzByj33YlMnkwQvTL+Pdp4A9BQ/8pqYHFM/yOjrvGTpJo1mc5H5hQ1RoLDaKS7R
         UJUpW6Nu688OJEqPQRFUgWlTkaH04dt8iaUTW6JtFA0RYrFSIJoi/TUXFtaRYo0/zy+V
         gjoT4ON7S5oKkd6AeGHdVZk8annadKgCUXWqEXKfxRcKoir429sg4fM7pyVjOjI/iA39
         Frz8J2NzyFb00TSIOkL0nt7bbEfvyVUf/SkyEW7EzremK08N2XThAZM4n8XE4DLYS/Lh
         I5rq9IJtP4mSGpqmmu7Ow8HqgsPhZvFBhVq5rtS/DHpi6z7MuMDS9XrVPICFS2Xj/7Dp
         Gd4A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.173.5 with SMTP id bg5mr3225452igc.35.1339185408931; Fri,
 08 Jun 2012 12:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.119.156 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 12:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: p...@paxtitania.com
In-Reply-To: <CA+ukNs6JaENPJZ=-Asccgy5AFhSnHm6-t75CreC2JA3mqCk...@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+ukNs4a-4tAt3kid+f9-Xr1Yp=0P1Nzqf63KeFQwvMOSgi...@mail.gmail.com>
	<746863fd-1d07-407d-97e3-e04fea9d9493@googlegroups.com>
	<CAK1P5zS43xM7YRcV8phyTf=YiB9ahgc6qtF_2mjyh4DMcwb...@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+ukNs6JaENPJZ=-Asccgy5AFhSnHm6-t75CreC2JA3mqCk...@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 15:56:48 -0400
Message-ID: <CAKOTTRZaSvMYUH8_v5Xq5Jo560mJ_yYHdWoaCWhJMtVbkue...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: {LVL1} Re: projector bulb dead
From: Christopher Cprek <paxtita...@gmail.com>
To: lvl1@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I sent Mark an email about purchasing a new bulb earlier today... but
I don't think he's acted yet.

If you have a recommended LED projector, put it up for a FAP. This is
why we have the process, and I imagine it'll have broad support.

Chris

On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Tim Miller <timmillert...@gmail.com> wrote:
> especially because there is a habit of leaving the projector on all the t=
ime
>
> On Jun 8, 2012 3:23 PM, "Jeff Johnson" <jeffjohn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Well said.:)
>>
>> On Jun 8, 2012 2:43 PM, "Aaron VerDow" <armoredc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Depending on how expensive bulbs are it might be worth getting an LED
>>> projector. =A0They cost around $400-$600 and the bulbs last the life of=
 the
>>> projector. =A0Personally I'd rather buy a new one that will last us a l=
ot
>>> longer than spend $200 on a new bulb.