Depending on how expensive bulbs are it might be worth getting an LED projector. They cost around $400-$600 and the bulbs last the life of the projector. Personally I'd rather buy a new one that will last us a lot longer than spend $200 on a new bulb.
> Well said.:)
> On Jun 8, 2012 2:43 PM, "Aaron VerDow" <armoredc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Depending on how expensive bulbs are it might be worth getting an LED
>> projector. They cost around $400-$600 and the bulbs last the life of the
>> projector. Personally I'd rather buy a new one that will last us a lot
>> longer than spend $200 on a new bulb.
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Tim Miller <timmillert...@gmail.com> wrote:
> especially because there is a habit of leaving the projector on all the time
> On Jun 8, 2012 3:23 PM, "Jeff Johnson" <jeffjohn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Well said.:)
>> On Jun 8, 2012 2:43 PM, "Aaron VerDow" <armoredc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Depending on how expensive bulbs are it might be worth getting an LED
>>> projector. They cost around $400-$600 and the bulbs last the life of the
>>> projector. Personally I'd rather buy a new one that will last us a lot
>>> longer than spend $200 on a new bulb.
> I sent Mark an email about purchasing a new bulb earlier today... but
> I don't think he's acted yet.
> If you have a recommended LED projector, put it up for a FAP. This is
> why we have the process, and I imagine it'll have broad support.
> Chris
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Tim Miller <timmillert...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > especially because there is a habit of leaving the projector on all the
> time
> > On Jun 8, 2012 3:23 PM, "Jeff Johnson" <jeffjohn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Well said.:)
> >> On Jun 8, 2012 2:43 PM, "Aaron VerDow" <armoredc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Depending on how expensive bulbs are it might be worth getting an LED
> >>> projector. They cost around $400-$600 and the bulbs last the life of
> the
> >>> projector. Personally I'd rather buy a new one that will last us a lot
> >>> longer than spend $200 on a new bulb.
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Jeff Johnson <jeffjohn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> current projector is a loaner. do we need to replace the bulb?
> On Jun 8, 2012 3:56 PM, "Christopher Cprek" <paxtita...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I sent Mark an email about purchasing a new bulb earlier today... but
>> I don't think he's acted yet.
>> If you have a recommended LED projector, put it up for a FAP. This is
>> why we have the process, and I imagine it'll have broad support.
>> Chris
>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Tim Miller <timmillert...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > especially because there is a habit of leaving the projector on all the
>> time
>> > On Jun 8, 2012 3:23 PM, "Jeff Johnson" <jeffjohn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Well said.:)
>> >> On Jun 8, 2012 2:43 PM, "Aaron VerDow" <armoredc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> Depending on how expensive bulbs are it might be worth getting an LED
>> >>> projector. They cost around $400-$600 and the bulbs last the life of
>> the
>> >>> projector. Personally I'd rather buy a new one that will last us a
>> lot
>> >>> longer than spend $200 on a new bulb.
The one on the ceiling is not a loaner. I either gave it to the space, or
was reimbursed... that was so long ago. I bought it for $100 or $200???.
Don't know what the cost of a bulb is. I wonder if we could hack a high
power LED to make it shine again.
Oh and I would vote +1 to buy a new projector. The one we have is not
great and it is used quite a bit.
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Jeff Johnson <jeffjohn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> current projector is a loaner. do we need to replace the bulb?
> On Jun 8, 2012 3:56 PM, "Christopher Cprek" <paxtita...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I sent Mark an email about purchasing a new bulb earlier today... but
>> I don't think he's acted yet.
>> If you have a recommended LED projector, put it up for a FAP. This is
>> why we have the process, and I imagine it'll have broad support.
>> Chris
>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Tim Miller <timmillert...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > especially because there is a habit of leaving the projector on all the
>> time
>> > On Jun 8, 2012 3:23 PM, "Jeff Johnson" <jeffjohn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Well said.:)
>> >> On Jun 8, 2012 2:43 PM, "Aaron VerDow" <armoredc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> Depending on how expensive bulbs are it might be worth getting an LED
>> >>> projector. They cost around $400-$600 and the bulbs last the life of
>> the
>> >>> projector. Personally I'd rather buy a new one that will last us a
>> lot
>> >>> longer than spend $200 on a new bulb.
I did some quick research and LED projectors don't appear to be suited for our usage. Specifically, partially lighted rooms and reading text (meetings and such). These are conference room type devices which require light control (small area, all switchable lights). Remember how we use the device is paramount instead of the latest tech fad.
I've seen these in use and I think it'll work fine. They are comparable to our current projector and I think the ability to leave it running all the time (which we tend to do) without worrying about power usage or burning out the bulb is more important than having the perfect image. I'll see if I can borrow one and try it out at our meeting tonight.
If we decide to replace the current projector, I will go ahead and submit a +1 right now ☺
All I ask is that:
1. The new projector should be able to “Overcome” the issue of projecting a visible image with lights on (Much high lumens)
2. It has a resolution that’s in-line with at least last-gen displays (in other words, at least 1024x768 (1280x1024 would be better…))
The above 2 “upgrades” might actually make “Movie-night” enjoyable.
(Just my 2 cents…not an expert… Your mileage may vary… all rights reserved… all lefts reserved too…
)<-- gotta balance the brackets…..
Patrick McCarthy
T 502.476.9878
C 502.939.1756
pmccar...@humana.com<mailto:pmccar...@humana.com>
From: lvl1@googlegroups.com [mailto:lvl1@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Aaron VerDow
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 9:46 AM
To: lvl1@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: {LVL1} Re: projector bulb dead
I've seen these in use and I think it'll work fine. They are comparable to our current projector and I think the ability to leave it running all the time (which we tend to do) without worrying about power usage or burning out the bulb is more important than having the perfect image. I'll see if I can borrow one and try it out at our meeting tonight.
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed
and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error,
please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Pat McCarthy <pmccar...@humana.com> wrote:
> If we decide to replace the current projector, I will go ahead and
> submit a +1 right now J****
> All I ask is that:****
> ** **
> **1. **The new projector should be able to “Overcome” the issue of
> projecting a visible image with lights on (Much high lumens)****
> **2. **It has a resolution that’s in-line with at least last-gen
> displays (in other words, at least 1024x768 (1280x1024 would be better…))*
> ***
> ** **
> The above 2 “upgrades” might actually make “Movie-night” enjoyable. ****
> ** **
> (Just my 2 cents…not an expert… Your mileage may vary… all rights
> reserved… all lefts reserved too…****
> *From:* lvl1@googlegroups.com [mailto:lvl1@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf
> Of *Aaron VerDow
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 12, 2012 9:46 AM
> *To:* lvl1@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: {LVL1} Re: projector bulb dead****
> ** **
> I've seen these in use and I think it'll work fine. They
> are comparable to our current projector and I think the ability to leave it
> running all the time (which we tend to do) without worrying about power
> usage or burning out the bulb is more important than having the perfect
> image. I'll see if I can borrow one and try it out at our meeting tonight.
> ****
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed
> and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error,
> please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Pat McCarthy <pmccar...@humana.com>wrote:
>> If we decide to replace the current projector, I will go ahead and
>> submit a +1 right now J****
>> All I ask is that:****
>> ** **
>> **1. **The new projector should be able to “Overcome” the issue of
>> projecting a visible image with lights on (Much high lumens)****
>> **2. **It has a resolution that’s in-line with at least last-gen
>> displays (in other words, at least 1024x768 (1280x1024 would be better…))
>> ****
>> ** **
>> The above 2 “upgrades” might actually make “Movie-night” enjoyable. ****
>> ** **
>> (Just my 2 cents…not an expert… Your mileage may vary… all rights
>> reserved… all lefts reserved too…****
>> *From:* lvl1@googlegroups.com [mailto:lvl1@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf
>> Of *Aaron VerDow
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 12, 2012 9:46 AM
>> *To:* lvl1@googlegroups.com
>> *Subject:* Re: {LVL1} Re: projector bulb dead****
>> ** **
>> I've seen these in use and I think it'll work fine. They
>> are comparable to our current projector and I think the ability to leave it
>> running all the time (which we tend to do) without worrying about power
>> usage or burning out the bulb is more important than having the perfect
>> image. I'll see if I can borrow one and try it out at our meeting tonight.
>> ****
>> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed
>> and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error,
>> please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.
I think a DIY projector would be awesome, but in the interest of time we should just get something that works first. If you would like to upgrade with a DIY later, that's definitely an option we can explore.
> I think a DIY projector would be awesome, but in the interest of time we
> should just get something that works first. If you would like to upgrade
> with a DIY later, that's definitely an option we can explore.
> something that would help any projector would be a screen that isn't
> translucent, makes the image wash out.
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Aaron VerDow <armoredc...@gmail.com>wrote:
>> I think a DIY projector would be awesome, but in the interest of time we
>> should just get something that works first. If you would like to upgrade
>> with a DIY later, that's definitely an option we can explore.
>> I'll be bringing this by tonight to test:
>> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824116516 >> This one has lots of bells and whistles so it's $700, if it works out we
>> can look into some cheaper, similar ones with similar output.
Well, the bulb is either DOA, or the projector has more serious troubles.
The error light blinks twice, indicating lamp failure (same error as before
the new bulb). Fans spin up, but no light. I'll leave the projector as-is
for the weekend, and start the RMA process Monday unless anyone can figure
it out.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Brad Luyster <bradluys...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Got a bulb for $85 on Amazon, reimbursed per LVL1 bylaws. If we end up
> FAPing for a new projector, hey, two projectors.
> Projector will be up and running by Friday.
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Tim Miller <timmillert...@gmail.com>wrote:
>> something that would help any projector would be a screen that isn't
>> translucent, makes the image wash out.
>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Aaron VerDow <armoredc...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>> I think a DIY projector would be awesome, but in the interest of time we
>>> should just get something that works first. If you would like to upgrade
>>> with a DIY later, that's definitely an option we can explore.
>>> I'll be bringing this by tonight to test:
>>> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824116516 >>> This one has lots of bells and whistles so it's $700, if it works out we
>>> can look into some cheaper, similar ones with similar output.
On Friday, June 15, 2012, Brad Luyster wrote:
> Well, the bulb is either DOA, or the projector has more serious troubles.
> The error light blinks twice, indicating lamp failure (same error as
> before the new bulb). Fans spin up, but no light. I'll leave the
> projector as-is for the weekend, and start the RMA process Monday unless
> anyone can figure it out.
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Brad Luyster <bradluys...@gmail.com<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'bradluys...@gmail.com');>
> > wrote:
>> Got a bulb for $85 on Amazon, reimbursed per LVL1 bylaws. If we end up
>> FAPing for a new projector, hey, two projectors.
>> Projector will be up and running by Friday.
>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Tim Miller <timmillert...@gmail.com<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'timmillert...@gmail.com');>
>> > wrote:
>>> something that would help any projector would be a screen that isn't
>>> translucent, makes the image wash out.
>>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Aaron VerDow <armoredc...@gmail.com<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'armoredc...@gmail.com');>
>>> > wrote:
>>>> I think a DIY projector would be awesome, but in the interest of time
>>>> we should just get something that works first. If you would like to
>>>> upgrade with a DIY later, that's definitely an option we can explore.
>>>> I'll be bringing this by tonight to test:
>>>> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824116516 >>>> This one has lots of bells and whistles so it's $700, if it works out
>>>> we can look into some cheaper, similar ones with similar output.
> Make sure the cover is on secure. Some have a sensor.
> On Friday, June 15, 2012, Brad Luyster wrote:
>> Well, the bulb is either DOA, or the projector has more serious troubles.
>> The error light blinks twice, indicating lamp failure (same error as
>> before the new bulb). Fans spin up, but no light. I'll leave the
>> projector as-is for the weekend, and start the RMA process Monday unless
>> anyone can figure it out.
>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Brad Luyster <bradluys...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>> Got a bulb for $85 on Amazon, reimbursed per LVL1 bylaws. If we end up
>>> FAPing for a new projector, hey, two projectors.
>>> Projector will be up and running by Friday.
>>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Tim Miller <timmillert...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>> something that would help any projector would be a screen that isn't
>>>> translucent, makes the image wash out.
>>>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Aaron VerDow <armoredc...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>> I think a DIY projector would be awesome, but in the interest of time
>>>>> we should just get something that works first. If you would like to
>>>>> upgrade with a DIY later, that's definitely an option we can explore.
>>>>> I'll be bringing this by tonight to test:
>>>>> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824116516 >>>>> This one has lots of bells and whistles so it's $700, if it works out
>>>>> we can look into some cheaper, similar ones with similar output.
Yes, you need to reset the timer. You do that through the on-screen menu,
which is difficult to get to when the bulb won't turn on.
Unless the instructions which guide you through the menu intend for you to
cross-reference the menu tree in the back of the guide in order to reset
the timer blind. If anyone wants to attempt this fool's errand, feel free.
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Tyler <tdmar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You might need to reset the lamp hour timer. How to do that should be a
> Google search away.
