Paul Jackson <p...@sgi.com> wrote:The code seems very complex for such a conceptually simple problem.
> Andrew wrote:
> Could you elaborate a bit on this critique, Andrew?
And doubts remain whether it is correct on particular wordsize/endianness
It seems that there is a layering violation in which this code is poking
If this code needs some arch-provided support function then so be it.
> Did I provide too many comments?You can never provide too many comments!
Anyway, please wake me up again when you and Joe have finished. (I agree
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.