I would like to submit the Learning Resource Metadata Initiative's
(LRMI) draft proposal for discussion.
The latest version (0.7) is available at:
http://wiki.creativecommons.org/LRMI/Properties
(or, in case you want to reference an archived version:
http://wiki.creativecommons.org/LRMI/Properties/Version_0.7 )
For background on LRMI, please see: http://lrmi.net and
http://wiki.creativecommons.org/LRMI
The use case for this proposal is to meet the needs of the educational
community including publishers, teachers, students, and learners of all
types. For specific use cases that the LRMI Technical Working Group[1]
used to inform their process, please see:
http://wiki.creativecommons.org/LRMI/UseCases
A couple notes on the draft:
1) This draft will be expanded with more examples.
2) There is a growing list of promulgators of competency-related
standards at http://wiki.creativecommons.org/LRMI/Promulgators This list
is intended to serve as a recommended list of promulgators to use when
referencing competencies by URI and should be viewed as non-exclusive;
there may be others we do not know of.
I have cc'd the LRMI mailing list with this message but feel free to
join that list at https://groups.google.com/group/lrmi .
All the best,
Greg Grossmeier, on behalf of the LRMI Technical Working Group
[1] http://wiki.creativecommons.org/LRMI/Technical_Working_Group
--
Greg Grossmeier
Education Technology & Policy Coordinator
twitter: @g_gerg / identi.ca: @greg / skype: greg.grossmeier
Boris
<quote name="Boris Goldowsky" date="2012-03-01" time="15:06:13 +0000">
> Has there been any progress on getting the accessibility terms added back in - or a timeframe when that might happen?
Right now that timeframe is: after we get some discussion on the core
LRMI terms on the public-vocabs mailing list and are close to a decision
on Schema.org inclusion.
I will reach out to my list of known interested parties when we will
regroup on this.
All the best,
Greg