Message from discussion
wireless hack for smart phone
Received: by 10.180.8.137 with SMTP id r9mr75807wia.2.1336574473336;
Wed, 09 May 2012 07:41:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: london-hack-space@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.180.19.168 with SMTP id g8ls789905wie.2.gmail; Wed, 09 May
2012 07:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.90.198 with SMTP id by6mr74876wib.4.1336574470456;
Wed, 09 May 2012 07:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.90.198 with SMTP id by6mr74875wib.4.1336574470431;
Wed, 09 May 2012 07:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <wzdd.google.gro...@lardcave.net>
Received: from apps.lardcave.net (apps.lardcave.net. [178.79.141.50])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id ga1si6071992wib.2.2012.05.09.07.41.10;
Wed, 09 May 2012 07:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of wzdd.google.gro...@lardcave.net designates 178.79.141.50 as permitted sender) client-ip=178.79.141.50;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of wzdd.google.gro...@lardcave.net designates 178.79.141.50 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=wzdd.google.gro...@lardcave.net
Received: from [192.168.1.65] (93-96-135-23.zone4.bethere.co.uk [93.96.135.23])
by apps.lardcave.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08B9BC8001
for <london-hack-space@googlegroups.com>; Wed, 9 May 2012 14:41:10 +0000 (UTC)
From: Nicholas FitzRoy-Dale <wzdd.google.gro...@lardcave.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E632F23A-4835-44A7-916D-B3FB1CCAEA02"
Subject: Re: [london-hack-space] wireless hack for smart phone
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 15:41:10 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAPyX2nesfF8mBTpMyMUAP_TcCM178YQXz_HeaAmqDp3-qh1KpQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: london-hack-space@googlegroups.com
References: <0f2cfa1a-9acd-427f-8e58-3a857d03c0f9@d8g2000vbw.googlegroups.com> <32774665.573.1336573589136.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbli11> <CADpd2_iRjXWud1aGfTquuQDbiHh3cpNisMiPfKGmKipwxu8Smw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPyX2nesfF8mBTpMyMUAP_TcCM178YQXz_HeaAmqDp3-qh1KpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <BD823E37-7A53-46CD-9D69-85495EF34...@lardcave.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
--Apple-Mail=_E632F23A-4835-44A7-916D-B3FB1CCAEA02
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
I've used those. They work well, and can be used without a breakout (you =
just need rx, tx, vss and vdd -- the hardest part was making a voltage =
divider for tx on an otherwise 5v circuit).
Nicholas
On 9 May 2012, at 15:31, Mark Steward wrote:
> These? =
http://www.dealextreme.com/p/wireless-bluetooth-rs232-ttl-transceiver-modu=
le-80711
>=20
>=20
> Mark
>=20
>=20
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Toby Catlin <t...@korfball.com> wrote:
> oooh I wanted to make some small magnetic bluetooth temperature =
sensors but was put off by the price of arduino bluetooth shields. Do =
you have a link for anymore?
> thanks
> toby
>=20
>=20
> On 9 May 2012 15:26, tom <bollocks...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd go with bluetooth, we found some cheap 3.3v modules on ebay a =
while back, i think they were about 6 quid each in total
>=20
>=20
> On Friday, May 4, 2012 1:09:47 PM UTC+1, ioAlan wrote:
> Hi lhs hackers. I run a software dev Co. called ioWorld and have a=20
> project requiring a hardware hack that's outside the scope of my=20
> capabilities; I want to create a wireless fob that a smart phone=20
> (Android, to start with) can detect at approx. 100 cm. Any protocol=20
> (inc. Bluetooth) will be ok for the POC/prototype but there is a=20
> strong commercial application for this tech, so ultimately a lo-power=20=
> protocol will be preferable.=20
>=20
> If you've hacked something similar previously, or know anyone else=20
> that has, I'd be grateful to hear from you and give you all the=20
> details. Please contact me at either: a...@ioWorld.com or on=20
> 07930667390
>=20
>=20
--Apple-Mail=_E632F23A-4835-44A7-916D-B3FB1CCAEA02
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=iso-8859-1
<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">I've used those. They work well, and can be used without a breakout (you just need rx, tx, vss and vdd -- the hardest part was making a voltage divider for tx on an otherwise 5v circuit).<div><br></div><div>Nicholas<br><div><br><div><div>On 9 May 2012, at 15:31, Mark Steward wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">These? <a href="http://www.dealextreme.com/p/wireless-bluetooth-rs232-ttl-transceiver-module-80711">http://www.dealextreme.com/p/wireless-bluetooth-rs232-ttl-transceiver-module-80711</a><br><br><br>Mark<div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Toby Catlin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:t...@korfball.com" target="_blank">t...@korfball.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
oooh I wanted to make some small magnetic bluetooth temperature sensors but was put off by the price of arduino bluetooth shields. Do you have a link for anymore?<div>thanks</div><div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">toby</font></span><div>
<div class="h5"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 9 May 2012 15:26, tom <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bollocks...@gmail.com" target="_blank">bollocks...@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I'd go with bluetooth, we found some cheap 3.3v modules on ebay a while back, i think they were about 6 quid each in total<div>
<div><br><br>On Friday, May 4, 2012 1:09:47 PM UTC+1, ioAlan wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0;margin-left:0.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi lhs hackers. I run a software dev Co. called ioWorld and have a
<br>project requiring a hardware hack that's outside the scope of my
<br>capabilities; I want to create a wireless fob that a smart phone
<br>(Android, to start with) can detect at approx. 100 cm. Any protocol
<br>(inc. Bluetooth) will be ok for the POC/prototype but there is a
<br>strong commercial application for this tech, so ultimately a lo-power
<br>protocol will be preferable.
<br>
<br>If you've hacked something similar previously, or know anyone else
<br>that has, I'd be grateful to hear from you and give you all the
<br>details. Please contact me at either: <a href="mailto:a...@ioWorld.com">a...@ioWorld.com</a> or on
<br>07930667390</blockquote></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div></body></html>
--Apple-Mail=_E632F23A-4835-44A7-916D-B3FB1CCAEA02--