Thanks, Akki I met John last night at the Curiosity Collective meeting which was really good he mentioned someone called Heather from london this may be you or someone else from London.
With regards to the space I think it would make sense for the different interest groups take control of tool access of the relevant tools this already seems to happen with the biohackers, music guys, it would probably makes sense to do this for the mechanical/welding stuff, woodwork and electronics. It would also help make the space a bit more personable if they had meetings on different days ( I realise there could be issues with this given the size of the space). 500+ poeple requires a fundamental change in how things operate, it's very hard to run a meeting with this many people let alone expect everyone to know each other.
There has been talk of putting access control on all the tools I think this is a really good idea. It could give a trail to who last used the tools if they did get damaged and there should be strong encouragement if you've damaged something i.e. if you blunt this chisel you should have someone who knows how to sharpen them correctly (found through sub group for relevant tools) supervise while whoever has damaged them fixes them. This isn't nessasarily going to be possible for everything but I think it's important for people to be their so they understand what is involved in keeping stuff in good working order. The other benefit is it enforces training/ confirmation that someone is competent. I guess a final benefit is it increases somewhat the security although this doesn't appear to have been a major issue to date ignoring people borrowing things unannounced.
Having meetings in person allows for much higher bandwidth communications. The current email/irc based system isn't fit for purpose anymore. Having minutes from meetings announced would be important to keep everyone updated to what current thinking and consensus is. As for coming to decisions I'd recommend consensus decision making, there are guides on the internet but it's likely there is someone who could run a course on this. It seems like the most well suited to the culture and attitude of the hackspace. It may make sense to have raporters from the different sub groups if the meetings get to big and unwiedly.
In summary:
- Formation of sub groups with ownership/control of relevant tools (with clear contacts)
- Access control put on everything
- Face to face meetings to discuss issues fortnightly
Anyway these are my thoughts. I don't think there is anything that is particularly novel here but it's what I think would be the most important things to get done to solve the major problems at the space.
Tom