Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Addressable power-strip safety thought
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
David Murphy  
View profile  
 More options Sep 25 2012, 12:19 pm
From: David Murphy <murphy.da...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:18:57 +0100
Local: Tues, Sep 25 2012 12:18 pm
Subject: Re: [london-hack-space] Re: Addressable power-strip safety thought

have it stay on while your card is in the reader.

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Peter "Sci" Turpin <s...@sci-fi-fox.com>wrote:

> The idea is that it would enable any tool to be tied into the
> access-control system. Each socket on the strip can be remotely turned on
> or off apparently.

> As I understand it the idea is to ensure people using mains powered tools
> are actually trained in using them. So use your access card to turn on a
> tool, if you're trained the plug it's connected to will come on. Only works
> though if the tool can't simply be moved to another active socket.
> I doubt it'll go on every single tool, probably just the more specialised
> ones.

> Hmm, though it does raise the point of how to turn it off again. Timed?
> Must be deactivated by initial user or loose tool privilege?

> On 25/09/2012 16:28, Adrian Godwin wrote:

>> If the power plug is captive, that would leave a bare wire when the
>> workshop's turned back on. Nobody will be patient enough to wait for a
>> keyholder to remove the cord, they'll tape it up at best.

>> Not really sure what problem this is solving. Why should the leads be
>> captive ?

>> -adrian

>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Monty <monty...@gmail.com> wrote:

>>> Step 1) Kill the power to all workshop or entire strip (it's an
>>> catastrophic
>>> emergency afterall)
>>> Step 2) Cut the power cord of the tool in question.
>>> Step 3) Leave a note.

>>> On Tuesday, 25 September 2012 16:13:46 UTC+1, Sci wrote:

>>>> I mentioned the idea on Saturday night that perhaps caging-in these
>>>> strips (a box to contain plugs but with wire-access slots and a padlock)
>>>> would be the simplest way of stopping people from bypassing the socket
>>>> allocations, rather than soldering tools in permanently.

>>>> Something that's occurred to me is the issue of tool failure. If a tool
>>>> fails catastrophically (bursts into flames, say), or someone gets a
>>>> serious shock then the power needs to be disabled instantly.

>>>> Each addressable power strip is going to need it's own emergency-off
>>>> button. Seems the only way to make them safe and still limit a tool to a
>>>> particular power socket. Fumbling for an access card to shut it off via
>>>> RFID would take too long in such circumstances.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.