Received: by 10.50.213.98 with SMTP id nr2mr3652918igc.5.1342345667193;
        Sun, 15 Jul 2012 02:47:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: london-hack-space@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.50.42.165 with SMTP id p5ls2284380igl.1.canary; Sun, 15 Jul
 2012 02:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.172.65 with SMTP id m1mr5180024icz.6.1342345663399;
        Sun, 15 Jul 2012 02:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.172.65 with SMTP id m1mr5180023icz.6.1342345663385;
        Sun, 15 Jul 2012 02:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <onida...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ob0-f178.google.com (mail-ob0-f178.google.com [209.85.214.178])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v3si2063129igw.1.2012.07.15.02.47.43
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sun, 15 Jul 2012 02:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of onida...@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.178 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.178;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of onida...@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.178 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=onida...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by obbwd20 with SMTP id wd20so9399743obb.23
        for <london-hack-space@googlegroups.com>; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 02:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=fXsrBxOo8UW9EGZnnnb6PBOaErrgD5GpBxCYUe/7vVg=;
        b=DFFujYxC/LI+TtVzH0xPrg4mmRsfgFtrdzC0I+VhQmXMPGoBXakidrrY8o8NFjfS2t
         CbhWa1IXWZ453AwPsJO+ABhhyiUXu5NL6M7p1xaxaCe/D47w40qwB/48tKcK/fmTL51S
         FFGop5Pki/LkFSG3y0+W6B+jJ9LctLoaflnF2Ed0LJuJSXQFb9xeNAUUZuw4UkOT2VHV
         gHxKv7HMBACHzdozgIThk1i9nKp+pDFnA3NWx8lIBpcNSSs9iBDSzPyH3K1qJoSf7rve
         NMzQx7FIFy335BueN1flRlmivUnIFb9tdpSiKvki5BUv6HHxzHqnm2Ycxa2PfKc/cYMv
         +0QA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.188.131 with SMTP id ga3mr2934714igc.54.1342345663024; Sun,
 15 Jul 2012 02:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.126.41 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 02:47:42 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: o...@section9.co.uk
In-Reply-To: <5001C962.3080...@sci-fi-fox.com>
References: <69ca1d32-26e5-4a2c-987a-681a2924014e@googlegroups.com>
	<50017C1C.9070...@sci-fi-fox.com>
	<CAC9rG2jC=mqXAeWKSZwNdK5a9BrEosRbJ9EEsFC+PkSo+pL...@mail.gmail.com>
	<5001C962.3080...@sci-fi-fox.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:47:42 +0100
Message-ID: <CADVxouiQQWeRkew0dz0nCE1e4Vd4KPUmY351AGx6QbZK=ZZ...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [london-hack-space] BBC World Service equipment auctions
From: Benjamin Blundell <onida...@gmail.com>
To: london-hack-space@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9341157690fc804c4db34f5

--14dae9341157690fc804c4db34f5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

EMFCamp related - we could probably do with one of the storage lockers ;)

B

On 14 July 2012 20:32, Peter "Sci" Turpin <s...@sci-fi-fox.com> wrote:

> Lots 8, 9, 15, 16, 24 and 25 all seem to be the same type of lockers,
> though in varying quantities.
> They all end within a few minutes of each-other, so if lot 9 is out, can
> potentially still get the same sort with secondary bids in time. If there=
's
> no last-minute bidding restrictions.
>
> Comparable volume per unit to members boxes, more secure, more compact,
> less chance of storage-spread (stacking items on-top/beside).
> Only downside that springs to mind is physically aquiring and moving them=
,
> but even then should be less trouble than moving, say, the 3-in-1.
>
>
> On 14/07/2012 15:07, Russ Garrett wrote:
>
>> On 14 July 2012 15:03, Peter "Sci" Turpin <s...@sci-fi-fox.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The storage lockers; possible alternative to sheving & members boxes?
>>>
>>
>> They do look nice, don't they (although potentially expensive). I put
>> in a =A370 bid on lot 9 (currently at =A355).
>>
>>
>

--14dae9341157690fc804c4db34f5
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

EMFCamp related - we could probably do with one of the storage lockers ;)<d=
iv><br></div><div>B<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 14 July 2012 20:32=
, Peter &quot;Sci&quot; Turpin <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:sci@=
sci-fi-fox.com" target=3D"_blank">s...@sci-fi-fox.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<=
br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Lots 8, 9, 15, 16, 24 and 25 all seem to be =
the same type of lockers, though in varying quantities.<br>
They all end within a few minutes of each-other, so if lot 9 is out, can po=
tentially still get the same sort with secondary bids in time. If there&#39=
;s no last-minute bidding restrictions.<br>
<br>
Comparable volume per unit to members boxes, more secure, more compact, les=
s chance of storage-spread (stacking items on-top/beside).<br>
Only downside that springs to mind is physically aquiring and moving them, =
but even then should be less trouble than moving, say, the 3-in-1.<div clas=
s=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><br>
<br>
On 14/07/2012 15:07, Russ Garrett wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On 14 July 2012 15:03, Peter &quot;Sci&quot; Turpin &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:s=
c...@sci-fi-fox.com" target=3D"_blank">s...@sci-fi-fox.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
The storage lockers; possible alternative to sheving &amp; members boxes?<b=
r>
</blockquote>
<br>
They do look nice, don&#39;t they (although potentially expensive). I put<b=
r>
in a =A370 bid on lot 9 (currently at =A355).<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>

--14dae9341157690fc804c4db34f5--