Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Shall we split this list into discussion vs. hackspace-org?

Received: by 10.180.73.134 with SMTP id l6mr1679168wiv.1.1349618918898;
        Sun, 07 Oct 2012 07:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: london-hack-space@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.180.99.65 with SMTP id eo1ls5438184wib.1.gmail; Sun, 07 Oct
 2012 07:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.107.38 with SMTP id gz6mr1690764wib.0.1349618912032;
        Sun, 07 Oct 2012 07:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.107.38 with SMTP id gz6mr1690763wib.0.1349618912020;
        Sun, 07 Oct 2012 07:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <deks...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com [209.85.212.174])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e5si693743wiw.0.2012.10.07.07.08.32
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sun, 07 Oct 2012 07:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of deks...@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.174 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.174;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of deks...@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.174 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=deks...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id hq7so2181116wib.15
        for <london-hack-space@googlegroups.com>; Sun, 07 Oct 2012 07:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
        bh=bhRmSD0nGOFrTZRXb4c9CsCF1qpsR8oOnUR9HdLQUsc=;
        b=dX+W7KX8nYS81U3f2tXrEL+1NGgIMsYuNaTFpBul/jtfT4DJJ58ZlsLTxcJm6K9DBD
         4iCQycJXIHKEky1Jd7I/a47AevUwIY/ySFINLs6p7zzuzh3j8mTE+biFC5TIENbn5kJp
         ZS0gV1cVoN+wGSYI1cbizPsXA7W8Tu1PExJNAjTzZbbeKKI/ZolTT0nxI+8Chhl0kzbQ
         Ethhllzqg79Bb49cPN7gLbOHEBZ5IAQ/7/DFESfh3fS+bkwcJQOgmeHmIFe67ikyfkOk
         BqSOq30B74RCYpzTe9QP+7tvo5jLfrLtGBstfh7LQter+5CMcug/+z4InpQ/3MeOAvx3
         jJSQ==
Received: by 10.216.26.138 with SMTP id c10mr8916685wea.76.1349618911828;
        Sun, 07 Oct 2012 07:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <deks...@gmail.com>
Received: from [192.168.1.5] (host86-183-71-169.range86-183.btcentralplus.com. [86.183.71.169])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hv8sm14650009wib.0.2012.10.07.07.08.29
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sun, 07 Oct 2012 07:08:30 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [london-hack-space] Shall we split this list into discussion vs. hackspace-org?
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From: Martin Dittus <deks...@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <50718B0B.60...@sci-fi-fox.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 15:08:27 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <956D82D1-2C5F-43EB-B0D4-18D762587...@gmail.com>
References: <0B4E0950-5914-4447-ADDC-3E3436973...@gmail.com> <50718B0B.60...@sci-fi-fox.com>
To: london-hack-space@googlegroups.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)

There's an "announce" list for announcements. I like the idea of =
automatically subscribing members to that list; although it seems atm =
nobody actively posts there either.

m.


On 7 Oct 2012, at 15:00, Peter Sci Turpin wrote:

> I still think the infrastructure list should be an automatic =
subscription for all members, a requirement of membership. Then use it =
for putting out the official updates, schedules and such. Like a =
newsletter.
>=20
> On 07/10/2012 13:45, Martin Dittus wrote:
>> Hey,
>>=20
>> Do people think it would make sense to split this list? E.g.:
>> - lhs-org: anything relating to the space itself, the organisation, =
the tools, membership questions, etc
>> - lhs-discuss: member projects, requests for help/advice, chatter
>>=20
>> We started an infrastructure list a long time ago which is =
essentially unused; maybe because it is a bit too specific, but also =
because we had much less traffic on the main list back then.
>>=20
>> Otoh there's now much more project chatter and random discussion, and =
it would be nice to give those discussions a bit more space.
>>=20
>> m.
>>=20