                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 2a02:af8:2:4100::9975 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of s...@sci-fi-fox.com) client-ip=2a02:af8:2:4100::9975;
Message-ID: <5072D395.2080500@sci-fi-fox.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 14:22:29 +0100
From: "Peter \"Sci\" Turpin" <s...@sci-fi-fox.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: london-hack-space@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [london-hack-space] Shall we split this list into discussion
 vs. hackspace-org?
References: <0B4E0950-5914-4447-ADDC-3E3436973E2E@gmail.com> <50718B0B.60100@sci-fi-fox.com> <956D82D1-2C5F-43EB-B0D4-18D7625872DC@gmail.com> <CAGqn4cbrGqwkU+RR0FpLZC8ZRbQNzhnUi2gY4Criz2vqEJYXPA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGqn4cbrGqwkU+RR0FpLZC8ZRbQNzhnUi2gY4Criz2vqEJY...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

And seeing what emails bounce would be helpful too, let the trustees 
know when a member is no longer individually contactable (something for 
safeties sake I think members should be).

On 07/10/2012 15:16, SamLR wrote:
> I would say that if members are going to be auto-subscribed to anything
> it should be the announce list as, IIRC, it's set up so only a few
> people can post. It can then become the canonical decision location.
> i.e. any discussion from here can be summarised and cross-posted. This
> would make the announce list both an excellent location for news but
> also allow it to act as a sort of archive for important decisions.
>
> S
>
> On 7 October 2012 15:08, Martin Dittus <deks...@gmail.com
> <mailto:deks...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     There's an "announce" list for announcements. I like the idea of
>     automatically subscribing members to that list; although it seems
>     atm nobody actively posts there either.
>
>     m.
>
>
>     On 7 Oct 2012, at 15:00, Peter Sci Turpin wrote:
>
>      > I still think the infrastructure list should be an automatic
>     subscription for all members, a requirement of membership. Then use
>     it for putting out the official updates, schedules and such. Like a
>     newsletter.
>      >
>      > On 07/10/2012 13:45, Martin Dittus wrote:
>      >> Hey,
>      >>
>      >> Do people think it would make sense to split this list? E.g.:
>      >> - lhs-org: anything relating to the space itself, the
>     organisation, the tools, membership questions, etc
>      >> - lhs-discuss: member projects, requests for help/advice, chatter
>      >>
>      >> We started an infrastructure list a long time ago which is
>     essentially unused; maybe because it is a bit too specific, but also
>     because we had much less traffic on the main list back then.
>      >>
>      >> Otoh there's now much more project chatter and random
>     discussion, and it would be nice to give those discussions a bit
>     more space.
>      >>
>      >> m.
>      >>
>
>