Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion A new 3D Scanner for the Hackspace
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Olfin  
View profile  
 More options Oct 8 2012, 8:28 pm
From: Olfin <anton...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 17:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Oct 8 2012 8:28 pm
Subject: Re: A new 3D Scanner for the Hackspace

It depends upon what you want to scan: sizes of objects, and expected
detail.

The Kinect is fundamentally unsuitable for use as a scanner: it is a very,
very noisy sensor, and it has a very low resolution. (time-of-flight is not
good for precision work)

I'm guessing that the most likely use is something in the 1cm to 200cm a
side range, for use in a 3D printer.

The best option with our budget at this point is to make a scanner. Laser
line scanners or structured light are a good way to go, as they are
inexpensive, and can be adjusted to scan objects of different sizes, after
calibration.

There are a good number of builds out there, and it's a fairly
well-documented thing.

In general, you need a good camera, turntable w/ stepper, and either a
laser line or a decent small projector that can be controlled precisely.

Contact probes are very accurate, but they're problematic to use, not to
mention expensive.

This is the Hack Space! Let's build one!

On Monday, 8 October 2012 19:24:00 UTC+1, Ulisses wrote:

> I've been thinking that a resource that could be very usefull for the
>  hackspace would be a 3D Scanner. I suppose it didn't really need to
> be able to scan very big objects; it's probably more important that it
> achieves a good level of detail.

> I'd like to have your feedback about which 3D Scanners you think would be
> more appropriate for the hackspace.
> If there are many people that find it usefull it would be worth starting a
> pledge for it.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.