time out

[Jasper Wallace]

Hi,

Rebecca from Time Out will/might be at the space today cos they are doing
a story on Hackspaces.

Apperently they are on a short deadline and couldn't wait till tuesday...

--
[http://pointless.net/] [0x2ECA0975]

[Tim Reynolds]

This evening or during the day?

[Russ Garrett]

Great. She emailed the trustees for permission a few days ago and
didn't wait for our response (which would have been to say no).

The story she's writing appears to link us to hackers and squats. I
don't think it would be good for us to be mentioned in that story.

--
Russ Garrett
ru...@garrett.co.uk

[Tim Reynolds]

If they've not bothered to wait for a reply and intend to misrepresent
the space, can we politely tell them to jog on?

[Russ Garrett]

On 16 November 2012 10:38, Tim Reynolds <t...@christwithfries.net> wrote:
> If they've not bothered to wait for a reply and intend to misrepresent the
> space, can we politely tell them to jog on?

I suggest we do it impolitely.

--
Russ Garrett
ru...@garrett.co.uk

[Adrian Godwin]

Or Youtube the viewing, explaining why she's completely wrong and asking why she's misrepresenting us ?

[jt]

Not entirely related, but it seems a nice counterpoint. I am doing a metal sculpture course at City Lit - the instructor (Andrew Revell), passed out a handout of notes, one of the available workshop areas listed is the hackspace, and he was very very positive about it (esp the concept). The sheet just has an address, and minimal details.

I've been meaning to say since last week, but this just seemed a nice time to mention it.

[Önder Vincent Koç]

Not going to help much after its in the next timeout and possibly published online too

--
Sent from Gmail Mobile

[Charles Yarnold]

We have replied to her inquiry declining her offer and requesting to not be included in the article. 

On 16 November 2012 10:28, Jasper Wallace <jas...@pointless.net> wrote:

[Jasper Wallace]

On Fri, 16 Nov 2012, Russ Garrett wrote:

> On 16 November 2012 10:38, Tim Reynolds <t...@christwithfries.net> wrote:
> > If they've not bothered to wait for a reply and intend to misrepresent the
> > space, can we politely tell them to jog on?
>
> I suggest we do it impolitely.

She's in the space now and says she's not seen any email :(

She'd like to talk to a trustee on the phone, anyone want to give a phone
number or do i just ask her to leave?

--
[http://pointless.net/] [0x2ECA0975]

[Charles Yarnold]

I can't take calls at the moment, it may be best to politely tell her that we have responded that we wish not to be interviewed. (with the hint to leave)

[Jasper Wallace]

On Fri, 16 Nov 2012, Charles Yarnold wrote:

> I can't take calls at the moment, it may be best to politely tell her
> that we have responded that we wish not to be interviewed. (with the
> hint to leave)

done, she's gone now.

> On 16 November 2012 10:57, Jasper Wallace <jas...@pointless.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Nov 2012, Russ Garrett wrote:
>
> > On 16 November 2012 10:38, Tim Reynolds <t...@christwithfries.net> wrote:
> > > If they've not bothered to wait for a reply and intend to misrepresent the
> > > space, can we politely tell them to jog on?
> >
> > I suggest we do it impolitely.
>
> She's in the space now and says she's not seen any email :(
>
> She'd like to talk to a trustee on the phone, anyone want to give a phone
> number or do i just ask her to leave?
>
> --
> [http://pointless.net/]                                   [0x2ECA0975]
>
>
>
>

--
[http://pointless.net/] [0x2ECA0975]

[Tom Sands]

Well, if she misrepresents us, just sue her for libel?